Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01967
Original file (PD-2013-01967.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX            CASE: PD-2013-01967
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY           BOARD DATE: 20140828
SEPARATION DATE: 20050520


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (63B/Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic) medically separated for chronic subjective low back pain (LBP). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB also identified and forwarded four other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication as medically acceptable. The Informal PEB adjudicated the low back condition as unfitting, rated at 10%. The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “I have been unable to get work or sustain physical condition for work and quality of life for the period starting Jan 2007. I want to request 100% disability rating and unemployability status, for service connected health problems and development of Type 2 Diabetes with pump insulin. PTSD persists and severe depression. My records reflect last dates of employment. Since then I have unable to work and/or gain employment in my field of training and MOS 63-s. My conditions prohibit me to get retrained. Please refer to med records for chronic conditions I still have my last board review and appeal filled and ultimately denied.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below; the not unfitting left ankle, left knee, left shoulder and heart murmur conditions were also determined to be within the Board’s defined DoDI 6040.44 purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050316
 VA - (Exam ~ 7 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Subjective LBP… 5299-5242 10% Lumbar Spine Strain L-5,S-1 5237 20% 20060109
Left Ankle Pilon Fracture Not Unfitting Left Leg Fracture 5262 20% 20060109
Left Knee Pain No VA Entries
Left Shoulder Pain
Heart Murmur
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 9 (Not in Scope) 20060109
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 70%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70711 (most proximate and available to date of separation)


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.

Low Back Condition. The CI reported the onset of LBP on 20 November 2000 after lifting some heavy tires. He was treated conservatively, but had persistent pain leading to a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 11 January 2002 which showed a herniated disc on the left at L5-S1 with impingement of the left S1 nerve root. He was evaluated in neurosurgery and elected to continue conservative management; however, this was not successful and on 6 August 2002 he underwent surgery on the herniated disc. This was complicated by a post-operative infection which responded to treatment. Prior to surgery, he was noted to have motor, sensory and reflex diminishment in the L5 and S1 distributions. These persisted, but improved in the post-operative period. Electrodiagnostic studies on 9 April 2003 showed mild left L4 and L5 radiculopathy without evidence of pathology at S1. His pain continued and an MRI performed on 17 September 2003 showed post-operative scarring with nerve root involvement. During his recovery from his back condition, the CI was in a motor vehicle accident on 1 June 2004 with a fracture of his left ankle which was treated with surgery. Despite rehabilitation, he continued to have pain and was entered into the Disability Evaluation System process. Repeat electrodiagnostic studies on 19 November 2004 were normal. The examiner noted break-away weakness on the left, but normal reflexes with upper motor neuron signs (such as weakness, poor tone), but these were not specified. Sensation was diminished in a stocking distribution, a non-anatomic pattern. Provocative testing for nerve root irritation was negative. A repeat MRI on 22 November 2004 showed degenerative disc disease and scar tissue encircling the left S1 nerve root. At the MEB examination performed that same day, the examiner noted flexion of 100 degrees (normal is 90) and reduced extension at 20 degrees (normal is 30.) Rotation and lateral bending both exceeded VA normal values (30) at 40 degrees bilaterally. Non-organic signs of pain were absent.

The narrative summary (NARSUM), dictated by an orthopedic surgeon, was dated 30 November 2004, 6 months prior to separation. The CI reported ongoing LBP with occasional radiation into his left thigh. He also reported occasional numbness in the left foot and left foot drop. On examination, he was noted to have an antalgic gait (one protective from pain) and a left foot drop. The paraspinal muscles were tender, but spasm was not documented. The range-of-motion (ROM) is below and increased his symptoms at end range. Weakness of the left leg muscles was present at 4/5 as well as diminished sensation in the left L4, L5 and S1 nerve root distributions. The left Achilles (ankle) reflex was reduced compared to the right. It was thought that his symptoms would continue to improve, but not sufficiently for him to return to his MOS without recurrence and aggravation of his symptoms. On 1 February 2005, the MEB determined that the back condition was medically unacceptable. Three days later, the CI requested continuation of active duty (COAD) if found unfit. The PEB determined that the back was unfitting on 3 May 2005. It noted that the left lower extremity weakness was not “substantiated by electrodiagnostic studies or intermittent examinations.” His ROM was limited by pain. the request by the CI for COAD was also noted.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 7 months after separation on 9 January 2006, the ROM was reduced as shown below in chart. The motor function was reduced as seen in 4/5 measurements for the knee and ankle in both flexion and extension on the left. The knee was attributed to the back condition and the ankle to the ankle fracture. The CI was noted to have a limp, but did not use an ankle brace. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below. The Board noted the significant difference in these two measurements from those obtained by the MEB examiner.
Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 NARSUM ~5 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 7 Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 45 45
Combined (240) 155 105
Comment Motor and sensory changes, but normal electrodiagnostic studies DeLuca negative
§4.71a Rating 20 % 20 %

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA rated the back at 10% and 20%, respectively, using the coding options 5299-5242, degenerative arthritis of the spine and 5237 (lumbosacral strain), respectively. The Board considered that the MEB examination would support a 10% rating, but that the NARSUM and C&P examinations warranted a 20% rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and 4.7 (higher of two examinations), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the back condition. The Board noted that neither the PEB nor the VA rated the CI for a neuropathy. Both documented weakness. However, the physical medicine specialist (at the second electrodiagnostic testing) noted break-away weakness (not a true organic weakness) and a non-anatomic sensory loss. The actual electrodiagnostic testing was normal without evidence of a neuropathy or radiculopathy. An abnormal gait was present at the NARSUM examination along with weakness, but this examination was accomplished 5 months after an ankle fracture and subsequent surgery. The Board concluded therefore that a preponderance of evidence does not support the addition of this condition as separately unfitting for an additional disability rating.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that the left ankle, left knee, left shoulder, and heart murmur conditions were not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The left ankle was included in the L3 profile and left foot drop noted on the profile written after the left ankle surgery. None of the conditions were specifically implicated in the commander’s statement and none were judged to fail retention standards. The VA examiner noted the ankle weakness and use of a brace. The evidence was reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was not a preponderance of performance based evidence from the record that any of the conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance sufficient to overturn the PEB adjudication. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the left ankle, left knee, left shoulder and heart murmur conditions and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the back condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5237 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the contended left ankle, left knee, left shoulder, and heart murmur conditions and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication as not unfitting. In the matter of the radiculopathy condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend it for additional disability rating. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Subjective Low Back Pain 5237 20%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131028, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record









XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150007096 (PD201301967)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01909

    Original file (PD 2014 01909.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The left leg condition, characterized as “post-surgical S1 nerve root impingement causing radiculopathy with weakness in left leg and foot” by the MEB, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB adjudicated the left S1 radiculopathy secondary to L5-S1disk herniation status-post left L5 hemilaminectomy and L5-S1 micro-diskectomy condition as unfitting with a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00609

    Original file (PD2012 00609.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FPEB adjudicated the previous conditions as it had before (chronic LBP and saphenous nerve palsy, left as unfitting, rating 20% and 0% respectively) and also adjudicated “Left knee pain due to retropatellar pain syndrome” as unfitting and rated at 0%. The VA coded the condition 8727 and rated 10%. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554(a), I approve the enclosed recommendation of the Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00362

    Original file (PD-2012-00362.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It referred back to the MEB examination for the physical findings. On examination, he was noted to have normal gait and posture. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record SFMR‐RB XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202‐3557 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01462

    Original file (PD-2014-01462.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060331VA -(> 6 Years Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Back Pain status post (S/P) L5-S1 Discectomy w/o Neurologic or Electrodiagnostic Abnormality...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02291

    Original file (PD-2013-02291.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The first record in evidence is a primary care note dated 26 April 2004 in which the CI reported LBP for a month without recorded trauma (but later recorded as after performing a “flutter kick”). At the MEB examination on 12 January 2005, 5 months prior to separation, the CI reported back pain since physical training. The primary care note on 13 July 2005, several weeks after separation, documented that the neurological examination had “no gross motor and sensory deficits.” The C&P...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00662

    Original file (PD2013 00662.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The hip was not separately examined. Pre-SepFlexion (90 Normal) 60 90 (95) Combined (240)--- 240 Comment §4.71a Rating 20% 0%The Board first considered if the back pain was a separately unfitting condition. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00218

    Original file (PD2009-00218.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The condition was determined to be medically unacceptable and the CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for continued military service, and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. Additional 5 degrees loss ROM with repeated motion; 5/5 motor; negative straight leg raise; decrease in sensation to pinprick and light touch on left leg and great...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00434

    Original file (PD2011-00434.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Foot Drop Condition . The NARSUM did note an absent right Achilles reflex (L5/S1 nerve root) and “a possible mild degree of ankle dorsiflexor weakness on the right.” The MEB neurology consultant noted that “the right foot becomes weak the more he walks,” and several clinical entries (as well as the CI himself in his rebuttal letter) document the onset of foot drop and bilateral leg numbness with exertional activities; not as a baseline. After considerable deliberation it was agreed...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01989

    Original file (PD-2014-01989.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The “chronic right leg pain due to stress fractures” and “right common peroneal nerve palsy” conditions were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the right leg neuropathy and right leg healed stress fractures as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% respectively, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02301

    Original file (PD-2013-02301.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA increased their radiculopathy rating, but maintained the 40% back rating until a subsequent exam in 2012 led to a decreased spine rating of 20%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX President Physical Disability Board of Review