Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01945
Original file (PD-2013-01945.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01945
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150211
SEPARATION DATE: 20050709


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (Motor Transport Operator) medically separated for chronic right ankle pain and right small finger contracture and pain. These conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty. She was issued a permanent U3L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right small finger contracture and pain (slight/intermittent) secondary to tendon reconstruction” and right ankle pain, (slight/constant),” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic pain, right ankle, rated as slight/constant and “right (dominant) small finger contracture and pain following tendon reconstruction as unfitting, rated 10% and 0% respectively, c iting application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: -Chronic Pain, Right Ankle as a result of Tendon Graft -Right (Dominant) small Finger contracture and pain following tendon reconstruction.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.




RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20050518
VA* - (~2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Pain, Right Ankle 5099-5003 10% Residuals Of Right Ankle Tendon Graft 5099-5024 10% 20050901
Right (Dominant) Small Finger Contracture and Pain 5230 0% Residuals Of Injury Right Small Finger 5227 0% 20050901
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
Scar, Right Ankle 7802 0% 20050901
Other x 7
RATING: 10%
RATING: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 51205 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) ) .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Pain, Right Ankle Condition. Treatment records evidence that the CI initially reported right ankle pain after harvesting of the plantaris tendon from her right ankle in July 2004. She underwent a post-operative course of physical therapy and anti-inflammatory medications without relief of the right ankle pain. A treatment note prior to discharge from physical therapy documented right ankle pain especially at the end of the day. The physical examination documented a mildly antalgic gait, mild tenderness to palpation at margins of the surgical scar, and full active right ankle range-of-motion (ROM). The narrative summary (NARSUM) noted “right ankle pain secondary to plantaris tendon removal.” The physical examination revealed mild right ankle swelling, hypersensitivity of the Achilles tendon, and pain limited ankle motion. The gait was noted as normal. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination dated 29 August 2005 documented that the CI worked at the Department of Motor Vehicles without any time lost from work and attended college. The VA C&P examination dated 1 September 2005, 2 months after separation, documented tenderness to palpation at the right ankle surgical scar, a normal gait, and slightly decreased dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. The goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Right Ankle ROM
(Degrees)
PT ~ 6 Mo. Pre-Sep
MEB ~ 5 Mo. Pre-Sep
VA C&P ~ 2 Mo. Post-Sep
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal) 3 3 15
Plantar Flexion (45) 30 30 40
Comment Painful motion Painful motion Tenderness to palpation
§4.71a Rating 10 % 10 % 10 %

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the chronic right ankle pain as unfitting, rated the condition at 10%, coded 5099-5003 (analogous to degenerative arthritis) and cited application of the USAPDA pain policy. The VA rated the chronic right ankle condition at 10% and coded 5099-5024 (analogous to tenosynovitis). The Board considered whether the evidence supported of a higher than 10% rating for the chronic right ankle pain condition. There was no evidence of marked limitation of motion for a 20% rating under VASRD coded 5271 (ankle, limitation of motion or incapacitating exacerbation) for a 20% rating analogous to 5003. The Board determined that PEB’s 10% rating analogous to 5003 (degenerative arthritis) was supported by the USAPDA pain policy and was compliant with VASRD §4.59 criteria for the painful motion. Considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), members agreed that a disability rating of 10% for the chronic right ankle pain condition was appropriately recommended in this case. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.

Right (Dominant) Small Finger Contracture and Pain Condition. Treatment records evidence that the CI sustained a right small finger injury after a fall in September 2003. She was subsequently diagnosed with a right small finger tendon (flexor digitorum profundus) avulsion and underwent surgical repair on 23 January 2004. She was treated post-operatively with occupational therapy and pain medications. On 8 July 2004, the CI underwent a second surgery (Stage II) to repair the right small finger tendon avulsion with a tendon from her right foot (harvesting of the plantaris tendon). The CI was treated post-operatively with occupational therapy (OT). Despite surgical repair and OT, the CI continued to report intermittent pain in the forearm with coldness of the fingers. An OT examination dated 28 January 2005 demonstrated significant loss of motion and strength in the right small finger. The NARSUM examination revealed decreased ROM of the right small finger. The VA C&P examination performed 2 months after separation, revealed a nontender right small finger surgical scar, fusion of the joint at the tip of the finger (proximal interphalangeal joint) to 0 degrees, and fusion of the joint at the middle of the finger (distal interphalangeal joint) to 15 degrees. Radiographic evaluation demonstrated a “mild flexion deformity of the distal little finger.” The examiner opined that the right small finger ROM impairment did not impact the CI’s activities of daily living or occupation.

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the right (dominant) small finger contracture and pain condition as unfitting. The PEB and VA rated the right small finger condition at zero percent. The Board noted that the only VASRD rating for small finger ankylosis or limitation of motion was 0%. Considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), members agreed that a disability rating of 0% for the right (dominant) small finger contracture and pain condition was appropriately recommended in this case. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy DoDI 1332.39 for rating chronic right ankle pain condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy/instruction by the Board. In the matter of the chronic right ankle pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised with regards to the right (dominant) small finger contracture and pain condition. In the matter of the right (dominant) small finger contracture and pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.




The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131028, w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
Affairs Treatment Record




XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review






SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150010565 (PD201301945)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                    Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                    (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 02363

    Original file (PD 2014 02363.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB also adjudicated surgical scar of residual of amputation 5th ray, moderately disfiguring, persistent digital neuroma and loss of grip strength secondary to 5th ray resection as Category II (contributing to unfit) conditions. It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. In addition to rating the 5th digit...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00941

    Original file (PD2012 00941.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “pain left ankle and right wrist” as a single unfitting condition, rated 0% and “fusion of distal interphalangeal joint of the left non-dominant ring finger” as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Pain Left (this should be right)Ankle and Right Wrist5099-50030%Right Ankle Fracture5010-527110%*19990626Right Wrist, Residuals, status post (s/p)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00870

    Original file (PD2012-00870.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After completing physical therapy, he was able to attend AIT physical training for the next 5 months, until he injured his hand at which time he was referred to the MEB. after sep §4.71a Rating *Initially rated 0%; administrative correction to 10% application Army USAPDA At time of MEB the occupational therapist opined “pain limits range of motion,” with documented normal extension with a decrease in flexion 160 degrees (normal 180 degrees) and decreased internal and external rotations. In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01720

    Original file (PD-2013-01720.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain in Multiple Locations Including Bilateral Peroneal Tendon Subluxation s/p Repair on the Right, Bilateral Knee Pain and Right Shoulder Pain5099-500320%Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, Right Knee5099-501410%20051017Right Shoulder Biceps Tendonitis5099-502410%20051017Peroneal Tendon Subluxation, Left Ankle5099-527110%20051017Surgical Residuals, Right Ankle5099-527210%20051017Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 6 Rating:...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01626

    Original file (PD 2012 01626.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, the Board considered the two conditions for separate disability ratings. The CI had painful limited ROM of the right shoulder, without evidence of instability following surgery. In the matter of the bilateral shoulder condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability ratings as follow: an unfitting right shoulder condition rated 10%, coded 5201 and an unfitting left shoulder condition, rated 0%, coded 5202, both IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00677

    Original file (PD2012-00677.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6040.44, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation and is limited to conditions adjudicated by the PEB as either unfitting or not unfitting. At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed a month prior to separation, the CI reported decreased sensation, continued weakness, and poor range‐of‐motion of the left thumb and hand. The VA rated the left thumb...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01010

    Original file (PD-2014-01010.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left small finger condition, characterized as “chronic left pinkie pain with decreased range of motion secondary to tendon and nerve injury”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also identified and forwarded high frequency hearing loss (HFHL) left ear; adjustment disorder; and right knee pain for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB adjudicated “left (non-dominant) small finger, limitation of motion of” as unfitting, rated 0%with likely application of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD 2011 00812

    Original file (PD 2011 00812.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was determined to have non-specific right shoulder pain. The VA initially rated the shoulder at 30% for a limitation in motion not in evidence on the VA examination or any other examination proximate to separation. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic Pain, Right (Dominant) Shoulder 5099-5003 10% COMBINED 10% The following...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00526

    Original file (PD-2012-00526.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post‐Separation*) – All Effective Date 20021210 Condition Service IPEB – Dated 20020716 Condition Delusional Disorder Right Elbow Pain Chronic Left Ankle Pain 5099‐5003 5099‐5003 Code 9208 ↓No Addi(cid:415)onal MEB/PEB Entries↓ Rating 0% 0% 0% Combined: 0% Code 9203 Delusional Disorder Right Ulnar Neuropathy Left Achilles Tendonitis 8599‐8516 5299‐5284 0% X 0 / Not Service‐Connected x 1 Combined: 80% Rating 70% 10% 10% Exam 20050620 20040601 20040601 20040601 *Delusional disorder first rated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00839

    Original file (PD2011-00839.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the LBP as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on severity at the time of separation. The Board also considered the VA examination after separation ROM upon which the VA based its 20% rating.