Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01919
Original file (PD-2013-01919.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX   CASE: PD-2013-01919
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army          BOARD DATE: 20150630
SEPARATION DATE: 20050127


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated Reserve E-4 (Motor Transport Operator) medically separated for a left knee condition. The left knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). “Three compartment chondromalacia” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic left knee pain” as unfitting, rated 0%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20041227
 VA* - Exam not Available
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Left Knee Pain 5099-5003 0% Traumatic Arthritis of Left Knee 5010 10% Unknown
Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 5
RATING: 0%
 COMBINED RATING: 30%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 80905 ( Original VARD not available ) .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The left knee operative report and the VA Compensation exam and VA rating decision proximal to separation were not available in evidence before the Board and could not be located after appropriate inquiries. Further attempt at obtaining the relevant documentation would likely be futile and introduce additional delay in processing the case; and, it is was judged by the members that the missing evidence would not alter the Board’s recommendations.

Left Knee. According to the narrative summary (NARSUM) the CI was medically evacuated from Iraq after injuring his left knee in July 2004. Arthroscopy in September 2004 revealed chondromalacia (inflammation and softening of the cartilage). The CI continued to experience knee pain that interfered with performance of his military duties and his civilian duties as a security guard. X-rays were normal, although a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study reportedly showed a possible medial meniscal tear. The NARSUM examination performed on 16 November 2004 demonstrated “full range-of-motion” but specific measurements were not provided. There was palpable crepitus, but the exam was silent regarding tenderness or painful motion. There was no ligament instability. The commander’s evaluation letter on 18 November 2004 confirmed that the CI was incapable of performing his duties due to pin in the left knee. The MEB exam on 6 December 2004 noted weakness, swelling and tenderness of the left knee. There was no other evidence proximal to the time of separation in the available record.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 0% rating coded analogously to 5003 (degenerative arthritis), citing normal X-rays and no loss of motion. The initial VA rating decision was not available, but later decisions documented that a rating of 10% was assigned effective the day after separation. The Board noted that there was no evidence of compensable limitation of motion. Although there was not clear evidence of painful motion (VASRD §4.59), its presence was reasonably conceded given the findings of knee crepitus, weakness and tenderness in the context of tri-compartmental degenerative changes. It was therefore concluded that a 10% rating was supported. There was no route to a higher rating under the 5259 code (cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic), and no support for rating under the alternate knee codes 5257 (knee, other impairment of) and 5258 (dislocated semilunar cartilage). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the left knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic left knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Left Knee Pain 5099-5003 10%
RATING 10%





The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131001, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review






SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150012497 (PD201301919)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01299

    Original file (PD-2013-01299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain due to Chondromalacia5099-500320%Chondromalacia Patella L Knee526120%20050311Chondromalacia Patella, R Knee526120%20050311Other X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x020050314 Combined: 20%Combined: 40%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050412 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01076

    Original file (PD2013 01076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION :“PEB rating of 20% w/disability discharge should have been at least 30% - VA Disability Rating of 30% upon review of military records.” Slight instability of the medial collateral ligament of the left and right knee was reported. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02209

    Original file (PD-2013-02209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered that the evidence in record supports that the CI had painful, limited ROM with imaging evidence of DJD following right knee injury and surgery, without significant instability. Left knee examination was the same as the right, except no effusion was present and physical therapy noted ROM of 0 degrees-130 degrees, without painful motion.At the VA C&P exam performed a week after separation the CI reported problems in the left knee due to compensation for his right knee. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00563

    Original file (PD-2014-00563.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Low Back Pain5299-523710%Chronic Low Back Strain523710%20050706Left knee Pain5099-50030%Residuals L/Knee Lateral Meniscus Repair, Chondromalacia Patella5259-501410%20050706Other x 0 (In Scope)Other x 1 Combined: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050811 ( most proximate to date of separation) Low Back Pain Condition . The CI complained of dull constant pain in the left joint line and pain behind the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01417

    Original file (PD-2013-01417.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. During repair, the operative report identified Grade 1 chondromalacia (arthritis) with synovitis, and normal medial and lateral menisci.Despite rehabilitation, the CI continued to have knee pain and effusions (swelling...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01737

    Original file (PD-2013-01737.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain Status Post Meniscal Repair5099-50030%Postoperative Residuals, Left Knee lateral Meniscal Tear Repair525910%20050727Other x 0 (Not In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01851

    Original file (PD 2012 01851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20030731 At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam (a month prior to separation), the CI was walking with a brace and had a limp of the right leg. The Board determined that potential codes for the right knee condition could include 5014 (Osteomalacia) or 5024 (Tenosynovitis), but that these would be rated under the same criteria as either code 5003 or 5019 under §4.71a at 10%.The Board considered whether a higher combined rating might be indicated under any other codes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00093

    Original file (PD-2014-00093.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01683

    Original file (PD-2014-01683.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Sep(20060710) Flexion (140 Normal)140140 with painExtension (0 Normal)00CommentCrepitus present.Crepitus and grinding present.The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01390

    Original file (PD-2013-01390.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Knee Condition . The range-of-motion (ROM) was flexion to 140 degrees (normal).There is one physical therapy note in the STR from September 2004 (after the NARSUM, 5 weeks prior to separation) which states “popping gone/clunking gone” (indicating pre-operative signs of loose cartilage had resolved); it also documents a normal gait with “mild” tenderness as the only positive finding, with nodocumentation of effusion, cartilage signs or instability.The VA Compensation and...