Upgrade.Vet

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01299

Original file (PD-2013-01299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD -20 13 - 0 1299
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 201 4 1002

Separation Date: 20040 731

SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (52D/Power Generation Equipment Repairer) medically separated for chronic bilateral knee pain. The knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The knee condition, characterized as “severe bilateral knee pain with mild diffuse cartilage loss in the medial compartment consistent w/chondromalacia,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic bilateral knee pain due to chondromalacia” as unfitting, rated 20% citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.

CI CONTENTION : The CI writes: “20% SC instead 60% SC.”

SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting bilateral knee condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040524	VA - (8 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition	Code	Rating	Condition	Code	Rating	Exam
Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain due to Chondromalacia	5099-5003	20%	Chondromalacia Patella L Knee	5261	20%	20050311
			Chondromalacia Patella, R Knee	5261	20%	20050311
Other X 0 (Not in Scope)	Other x 0	20050314
Combined: 20%	Combined: 40%

Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050412 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])

ANALYSIS SUMMARY : IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

The PEB rated the c hronic b ilateral k nee p ain due to c hondromalacia condition under the single analogous code of 5099-5003 ( degenerative arthritis ) . This coding approach is countenanced by AR 635-40 (B.24 f.), but IAW DoDI 6040.44 the Board must apply only VASRD guidance to its recommendation. The Board must therefore apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each joint are achieved IAW VASRD §4.71a. If the Board judges that two or more separate rati ngs are warranted in such cases, however, it must satisfy the requirement that each “unbundled” condition was reasonably justified as unfitting in and of itself, with the caveat that the final recommendation may not produce a lower combined rating as that of the PEB.

Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain due to Chondromalacia Condition . The CI developed bilateral knee pain during boot camp in April 2002 and was treated with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). The pain worsened and he started to have bilateral knee swelling. He was seen by Family Practice for bilateral knee pain, swelling, crepitus and painful motion. The examiner diagnos ed retropatellar pain syndrome and prescribed a 3 month p rofile, physical therapy consult, NSAID, X - ray and ice massage. The CI reinjured his left knee and the X -ray showed a small effusion. The CI continued to be followed by Family Practice and was noted to have chronic bilateral knee pain , mild abnormal patella tracking, pain and edema. The left and right knee magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) demonstrated mild diffuse cartilage loss in the medial knee without meniscal or ligament tears. The o rthopedist noted bilateral knee pain left worse than right, increased pain, swelling and an antalgic gait with locking, catching, edema and instability. The physical exam findings were mild tenderness to palpation at the medial joint lines, positive McMurray ’ s sign along the medial joint line and retropatellar crepitus. The CI was given a permanent L3 Profile for severe knee pain with cartilage loss in both knees . The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 3.5 months prior to separation documented that the CI had sharp, constant bilateral knee pain and swelling which was worse with walking, lifting objects or carrying heavy objects. He had bilateral knee popping when walking and occasionally walked with a limp. The examiner rated the pain according to the A merican Medical Association pain scale at slight to moderate and constant. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The c ommander’s s tatement indicated that the CI’s condition prevented hi m from performing the duties of his MOS.

The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 7.5 months after separation documented worsening of the bilateral knee pain which was precipitated by walking and standing a lot and the CI required a cane for ambulation outside of the house. The VA C&P physical exam findings are also summarized in the chart below .

There were two goniometric range - of -motion evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the following chart:

Knee ROM (Degrees)	NARSUM 3 Mo s . Pre-Sep	VA C&P 7 Mo s . Post-Sep
	Left	Right	Left	Right
Flexion (140 Normal)	115	115 ( 116 )	110	110
Extension (0 Normal)	0	0	-10	-10
Comment	Pos. painful motion, crepitus and effusions; Pos. tenderness to palpation ; No instability; Normal strength	Normal gait; Pos. painful motion & crepitus; No instability, weakness, or effusion; Pos. DeLuca criteria
§4.71a Rating	10%	10%	2 0%	20 %

invalid font number 31502

T he Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the c hronic b ilateral k nee p ain due to c hondromalacia condition as 5099 analogous to 5003 ( degenerative a rthritis ) and rated at 2 0% with application of the USAPDA pain policy. The VA coded the c hondromalacia p atella with p atellofemoral p ain s yndrome, l eft k nee and r ight k nee separately as 5261 ( limitation of leg extension ) and rated at 20% each knee , including 10% add ed to each knee citing DeLuca criteria . All exams accomplished proximate to separation documented pain limited motion for both knees. There was no distinction in the record that one knee was worse than the other , b oth knees had similar MRI finding of mild diffuse cartilage loss in the medial compartment without meniscal or ligament tears and there were no unilateral distinctions with regards to clinical features or fitness considerations . Board members agree that there are sufficient grounds for recommending separate right and left knee disability ratings at the time of separation. The c hronic b ilateral k nee p ain due to c hondromalacia condition was most compatible with VASRD code 5099-5003 as applied by the PEB. The Board adjudged that the MEB examination was closer to separation and therefore had the higher probative value. Ap plication of VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) and §4.40 (functional loss) is appropriate based on the evidence and under code 5003 is granted a 1 0% rating for each knee . The Board considered the 20% for each knee as granted b y the VA, however, the Board placed greater probative value on the more proximate, pre-separation data contained in the NARSUM. There was no evidence of incapacitation due to the knee pain as required for a 20% rating under code 5003. A fter due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously recommends that each joint be separately adjudicated as follows: an unfitting right knee pain condition coded 5099-5003 and rated 10%, and an unfitting left knee pain condition, coded 5099-5003 and rated 10%, both IAW VASRD §4.71a. Although the PEB cited the USAPDA pain policy to arrive at its 20% rating, the Board’s rating recommendation of 10% for each knee also results in a 20% combined rating and confers no benefit to the CI.

BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy ( 635-40) for rating the c hronic b ilateral k nee p ain due to c hondromalacia condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the c hronic b ilateral k nee p ain due to c hondromalacia condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, and although it confers no benefit to the CI, the Board unanimously recommends that each joint be separately adjudicated as follows: an unfitting right knee pain condition coded 5099-5003 and rated 10%, and an unfitting left knee pain condition, coded 5099-5003 and rated 10%, both IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re - characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination .

invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130909 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President

Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150002678 (PD201301299)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR

( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01856

Original file (PD2012 01856.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

There is insufficient evidence to support a finding of not unfitting for either knee.Therefore, it is reasonably justified that the CI be found unfit for continued military service in her MOS due to her left and right anterior knee pain with patellar crepitus and patellar apprehension condition. However, there is no evidence of any further examination in the record. Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01978

Original file (PD-2013-01978.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral anterior knee pain” as unfitting, rated 10%. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner recommended an NSAID, continued use of a splint, aggressive PT and Hyalgen...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01224

Original file (PD-2013-01224.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

Bilateral Knee Pain Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the bilateral knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00953

Original file (PD 2012 00953.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The PEB adjudicated bilateral anterior knee pain syndrome as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and recurrent stress fracture of right tibia as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MEB examiner referred to the exam results documented on the MEB DD Form 2808 which are summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 8 days prior...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02210

Original file (PD-2013-02210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Bilateral Knee Pain Condition . The CI continued with left knee pain and was seen by physical therapy (PT) for an evaluation. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01882

Original file (PD 2014 01882.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The right knee condition, characterized by the MEB as “tricompartmental chondromalacia of the right knee,” “lateral meniscus tear” and “left knee neuroma” (Board believes this to be an error and should have been right knee), were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The Informal PEB adjudicated “tricompartmental chondromalacia of the right knee” as unfitting, rated at 10%, with likely application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01005

Original file (PD2012 01005.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

Service IPEB – Dated 20020313VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Leg Pain due to Recurrent Tibial Stress Fractures5099-50030%Tibial Stress Fracture, Left Leg5299-50100%Service Treatment Record (STR)Tibial Stress Fracture, Right Leg5299-50100%STR Rating: 0%Combined Rating: 0%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20050105 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The Board must therefore apply separate codes and...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02810

Original file (PD-2013-02810.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The PEB adjudicated the three knee conditions as one condition, “chronic bilateral knee pain”, rated at 10% citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. Chronic Bilateral Knee Pain Condition . In the matter of the chronic bilateral knee pain condition, the Board , by an majority vote, recommends that each knee is separately unfitting and should be rated as follows : chronic right knee pain condition coded as 50 99-5003, rated at 10% and the chronic left knee...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01935

Original file (PD 2012 01935.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The rating for the unfitting chronic left knee pain condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Chronic Left Knee Pain Condition . invalid font number 31502 SAMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140020828 (PD201201935) 1.
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02688

Original file (PD-2013-02688.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The Informal PEB (IPEB)adjudicated the chronic bilateral knee pain as unfitting, rated 10%, citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01299

Similar Decisions