Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01417
Original file (PD-2013-01417.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2013-01417
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150114
SEPARATION DATE: 20040702


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Accounting Specialist) medically separated for chronic pain, left knee. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic left knee pain condition, characterized as “left knee pain and instability” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic pain, left knee” as unfitting, rated 0%, citing criteria of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Have had continued pain, medication, injections, and recent surgery. Have lossed range of motion. Was not separated for migraines.” [sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040322
 VA - (3 Years 1 Month Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Pain, Left Knee … 5099-5003 0% Status Post ACL Repair: Degenerative Changes Left Knee 5010 10% 20070802
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2 (Not in Scope)
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70919 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Pain, Left Knee Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM) noted that the CI tore the anterior cruciate ligament of her left knee while running the physical fitness test in 2001. During repair, the operative report identified Grade 1 chondromalacia (arthritis) with synovitis, and normal medial and lateral menisci. Despite rehabilitation, the CI continued to have knee pain and effusions (swelling in the joint). At the MEB exam, the CI reported intermittent to frequent pain, edema, effusions, and the occasional feeling of instability. The NARSUM exam noted that the knee had full range-of-motion (ROM) (normal 0-140 degrees), moderate effusion, with laxity of the lateral collateral ligament (instability test), pain on anterior Lachman (instability test), and pain medially with a “clunk on extension” on valgus stress. There was no instability on the Lachman or anterior drawer tests. McMurray examination (meniscal sign) was negative. At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed 3 years after separation, the CI reported that her “knee swells constantly and never goes down,” she continues to use a brace and that her knee pain interferes with her activities of daily living and her job. The examiner noted that her gait was steady and smooth, “Left quadriceps muscle 44.5 cm. Right quadriceps 48 cm. Loss of normal curvature. Suprapatella, medial and lateral tenderness to palpation. Crepitus. No increased heat or redness. No edema. Moderate effusion. Extension 0 degrees. Flexion 0-90 degrees with pain at 90 degrees. Pain with ROM. Repetition of three produced increased pain, weakness, lack of endurance, fatigue and in coordination with flexion to 90 degrees with no additional loss of range of motion than noted. Knee stable.” Later VA records indicated knee surgery (2012) and additional VA rating for instability effective 2008 and increased in 2009.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the chronic left knee pain at 0% under 5099-5003 (arthritis degenerative). Three years remote from separation, the VA rated the knee at 10% under 5010 (traumatic arthritis). The VA exam was too remote to have a high probative value, and the MEB exam was used for the Board’s rating determination. The service treatment record did not document any compensable ROM impairment under the specific knee codes; however, there was objective evidence of painful motion and effusions to warrant a 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) under 5099-5003. There was no meniscal pathology for any rating under 5258 or 5259 (cartilage, semilunar).

The Board considered if there were sufficient evidence of knee instability for dual coding of the knee, or a higher rating under code 5257 (Knee, other impairment). The NARSUM exam documented lateral ligament laxity, the CI had symptoms of instability and the NARSUM and MEB diagnosis included knee instability. The Board therefore determined that dual (additional) rating with a 10% (“slight”) rating coded 5257 was warranted. There was insufficient evidence that instability rose to the “moderate” 20% level of disability. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board majority recommended dual rating of the knee with a disability rating of 10% coded 5099-5003, and an additional 10% rating coded 5099-5257 (knee other impairment).


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the chronic left knee pain was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the chronic left knee pain condition, the Board majority recommends dual rating of the knee with a disability rating of 10% under 5099-5003, and an additional 10% rating coded 5099-5257, both IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Pain, Left Knee 5099-5003 10%
5099-5257 10%
COMBINED
20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130916, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150007854 (PD201301417)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00135

    Original file (PD-2014-00135.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any condition or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain/Instability Left Knee5099-500310%Left Knee Multi-Ligament Injury5010-525710%20070331Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 0 (Not in Scope)20070331 Combined: 10%Combined: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01629

    Original file (PD-2013-01629.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Patellofemoral Pain, Bilaterally… 5099-50030%Patellofemoral Syndrome…Left…525710%20050514Patellofemoral Syndrome…Right…52580%Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 4 Combined: 0%Combined: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050608 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB combined the bilateral knee pain conditions as a single unfitting condition rated at 0%, coded 5099-5003 (analogous to degenerative arthritis).The PEB relied on AR 635.40...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02698

    Original file (PD-2013-02698.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditionwas submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “left knee pain due to degenerative joint disease [DJD]” and “right ankle pain due to degenerative joint disease”as unfitting, rated 10% and 10%, citing application of the DODI and Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Knee Pain due to DJD5009-500310%Left Knee Residuals, S/P ACL … 5003-526010%20090831Right Ankle Pain due to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00930

    Original file (PD-2014-00930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain, Patellofemoral Syndrome, s/p Arthroscopy x25099-500310%Degenerative Arthritis, Left Knee5260-500310%20110803 Internal Derangement, Left Knee5003-525730%20110803Other x0Other x1 RATING: 10%RATING: 40%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20120720(most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Left Knee Pain . After review by a Decision Review Officer, the VA applied two different VASRD codes to the left...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02209

    Original file (PD-2013-02209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered that the evidence in record supports that the CI had painful, limited ROM with imaging evidence of DJD following right knee injury and surgery, without significant instability. Left knee examination was the same as the right, except no effusion was present and physical therapy noted ROM of 0 degrees-130 degrees, without painful motion.At the VA C&P exam performed a week after separation the CI reported problems in the left knee due to compensation for his right knee. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01924

    Original file (PD-2013-01924.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I was just rated for knee and two knee surgeries. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20050810VA* -Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain…5099-500320%Osteoarthritis, Left Knee, Status Post Two ArthroscopicSurgeries501010%STROther x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 1 RATING: 20%RATING: 10% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20060628(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00320

    Original file (PD-2014-00320.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Tibia/Fibula Stress Fractures...5099-50030%RPPS Left Knee; Stress Fracture Left Tibia and Fibula525710%20050728Bilateral Retropatellar Pain Syndrome (RPPS) Not UnfittingRPPS Right Knee; Stress Fracture Right Tibia 525710%No Additional MEB/PEB Entries in ScopeNo Other VA Conditions in Scope Combined: 0%Combined: 50%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050928 ANALYSIS SUMMARY :Almost all analogous VASRD coding and rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00768

    Original file (PD2012-00768.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20040701 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200768 BOARD DATE: 20130103 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated National Guard SSG/E-6 (95B30/Military Policeman), medically separated for chronic left knee pain. The MEB forwarded left knee retropatellar pain syndrome, left knee Baker's cyst, and left...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 02245

    Original file (PD 2014 02245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as “left knee pain with chondromalacia patella” by the MEB, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.Although the final PEB diagnosis was persistent knee pain “due to Patellofemoral Syndrome” and the MEB diagnosis was due to “chondromalacia patella,” the NARSUM diagnosis was due to “subluxation.” Radiographs indicated degenerative changes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02254

    Original file (PD-2014-02254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left Knee Condition . However, although the CI reported that his knee frequently “gave out” at the C&P exam, there was no instability or laxity noted at the MEB or C&P exams and after separation rehab records...