Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816
Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
 PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX          CASE : PD -20 13 - 01816
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 4 0701
Separation Date: 20040602


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (62E/Tank System Mechanic) medically separated for chronic back pain without a specific injury or neurologic abnormality. The back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “low back pain with spondylolytic spondylolisthesis Grade 1 L5-S1 with degenerative disc disease L4-5 with dehydration and bulge,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic back pain without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria and with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI appealed to the Formal PEB but later withdrew his request and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : The CI attached a two page statement to his application which was reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations.


 SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below and no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20040205
 VA - (4.5 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain w/o Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5237 10% Degenerative Disc Disease(DDD) with L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis and Broad Based Disc Bulge at L4-5; Lumbar Spine 5239 10% 20040123
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x3
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Original VARD not contained in the e v idence


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.
Chronic Back Pain without Neurologic Abnormality Condition : The CI developed a traumatic low back pain ( LBP) in 2002. He underwent physical therapy (PT) and the pain resolved; however , the pain reoccurred in March 2003. He was seen in the emergency room ( ER ) for an acute onset of LBP and reported pain with lifting and rated the pain at 4 to 5 out of 10 with 10 being the worst. He denied any leg weakness or bowel or bladder dysfunction. The physical exam findings were palpable back spasms T12-L2 in the paraspinal muscles and tight hamstrings. The examiner prescr ibed a temporary p rofile for a week, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and a muscle relaxant. He was evaluated by PT who noted that the LBP symptoms were worse with sitting, lifting, standing, walking and lying down. The physical exam findings were tenderness al ong the lumbar spine, range - of - motion (ROM) flexion 50% and extension 25%-50% with a posture that demonstrated a mild shift to the left. The CI required ER treatment for LBP in July and August 2003 and reported pain which radiated to his right leg. A lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a broad- based disc bulge at L4-5 and Grade I spondylolisthesis of L5 on S1 . He was see n in the ER twice in November 2003 for acute LBP and paresthesia’s to the right leg and was prescribed a narcotic medication. The o rthopedist documented chronic LBP and tender to palpation in right lumbar paraspinal muscles. The examiner recommended a cane for ambulation and to start the MEB process. The o rthopedist reported that an electromyogram (EMG) was normal. The c ommander’s s tatement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 months prior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still ha d occasional moderate LBP. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart above. The CI was given a permanent L3 Profile for LBP. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 4 months prior to separation documented daily back pain rated four to five on a pain scale, which was aggravated by prolonged standing, sitting or using a broom and interfered with his mechanic work. He reported occasional muscle spasms and a dull back pain which would become a stabbing pain with aggravation. He tried multiple NSAIDS without relief and could not lift anything greater than 30 pounds. The CI reported a “dead weight” feeling in his right lower leg when his back flared pain was rated at 3 to 4 but could go as high as 10 when the back was aggravated and that his leg gave out a few times . The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below . The CI required ER evaluation in May 2004 for LBP and was noted to use a cane for ambulation. The examiner documented pain was 8 out of 10 and the CI was given a NSAID injection for acute pain.

There were two goniometric ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arrivi ng at its rating recommendation as summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) MEB ~5 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 4. 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 40 * 90 (95)
Combined (240) 135 155
Comment * ROM appeared to be measured as isolated lumbar flexion (not thoracolumbar) with normal being 60 degrees ; Walks, sits, stands slowly; No spasm or tenderness; Normal motor/sensory/reflexes ; Pos. painful motion ; Neg. Waddell’s Normal gait & posture; Pos. t enderness to palpation & painful motion ; Patellar reflexes slightly decreased bilaterally ; No spasm
§4.71a Rating 20% (PEB 10%) 10%
invalid font number 31502
The Board considered whether an additional rating could be recommende d under a peripheral nerve code for the associated sciatic radiculopathy at separation. Firm Board precedence requires a functional impairment linked to fitness to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating to disability in spine cases. The pain component of a radiculopathy is subsumed under the general spine rating as specified in §4.71a. The sensory component in this case has no functional implications, and no motor weakness was in evidence. An EMG done was normal. There is thus no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment from the residual radiculopathy and, the Board cannot support a recommendation for an additional disability rating on this basis.

The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the chronic back pain without neurologic abnormality condition as 52 99 analogous to 5237 l umbosacral or cervical strain and rated at 1 0%. The VA coded the degenerate disc dis ease with L5-S1 s pondylolisthesis and broad based disc b ulge at L4-5 lumbar spine condition as 52 39 spon dylolisthesis or segmental instability and rated at 10%. The g eneral r ating Formula for d iseases and i njuries of the s pine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “ w ith or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” The MEB NARSUM exam documented a “lumbar” forward flexion at 40 degrees. That exam did not meet the VASRD standard thoracolumbar ROM measurement required for rating under §4.71a. The VASRD standard ROM measurements are for the thoracolumbar spine while the MEB NARSUM appeared to document isolated lumbar spine ROM (normal for isolated spine ROM is 60 degrees). The VA C&P exam documented thoracolumbar forward flexion at 95 degrees. The Board adjudged that the VA C&P exam was closer to separation and met the VASRD measurement requirements; therefore , the Board assigned it a higher probative value. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic back pain without neurologic abnormality condition and that no peripheral nerve condition be added.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic back pain without neurologic abnormality condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re - characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination .

invalid font number 31502


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130929, w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record








                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150001005 (PD201301816)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00117

    Original file (PD-2014-00117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Physical exam showed decreased, but unmeasured, range-of-motion (ROM) of the lumbar spine.At the physical therapyexam on 19 September 2005 (2 months prior to separation), pain limited motion was noted to occur on flexion, left lateral flexion and rotation (see chart below).Increased pain from motion “quickly returned to baseline.” All measurements were repeated three times.At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam on 13 February 2006 (3 months after separation) the CI complained of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01741

    Original file (PD-2014-01741.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbar degenerative disc disease without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD condition as 5242 and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00761

    Original file (PD-2012-00761.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200761 SEPARATION DATE: 20020116 BOARD DATE: 20121218 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a National Guard Soldier, SGT/E‐5 (45E, assigned to a Hull Systems Mechanic slot, 63E), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) accompanied by neck pain with degenerative disc disease (DDD) at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01336

    Original file (PD-2012-01336.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pre -Separation) – All Effective Date 20030416 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Back Pain & Loss of Motion 5293-5299- 5292 20% S/p Laminectomy L4-5, L5-S1 5293-5292 40% 20030205 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. At the MEB exam, the NARSUM, 24 October 2002, noted “gradual improvement of pain,” but with “persistent difficulties with bending, stooping, lifting and running.” The MEB physical exam noted that the “general physical examination is within normal limits.” The NARSUM...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01774

    Original file (PD-2013-01774.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)*ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain, without Neurological Abnormality5299-523710%Diffuse Lumbar Spondylosis5003-524210%20050104Left L5-S1 Radiculopathy 8599-852010%20050104Other x 0Other x 3 Rating: 10%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050323 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]) Low Back Pain (LBP) . A 10% rating is also warranted when combined thoracolumbar ROM is greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00364

    Original file (PD2010-00364.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. Service Treatment Record I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00194

    Original file (PD2012-00194.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA rated each lower extremity at 10% coded 8521 for peripheral neuropathy. Since no evidence of functional impairment exists in this case, the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on peripheral nerve impairment. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING 5242 COMBINED 10% 10% Chronic LBP The following documentary...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02308

    Original file (PD-2013-02308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He rated his pain at 4/10. Deluca criteria§4.71a Rating10%* (PEB 10%)10% (VA 10%) invalid font number 31502 *IAW VASRD §4.59, Painful motion invalid font number 31502 The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB coded the chronic LBP secondary to L5-S1 HNP without neurologic deficit condition 5243 (Intervertebral Disc Syndrome) and rated at 10%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01911

    Original file (PD-2013-01911.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA rated under a peripheral nerve code 8520 (sciatic nerve) at 40% (moderately severe) citing pain and numbness to both extremities; in addition to lumbar disc protrusion for 10% under code 5242 (degenerative arthritis).Board members first agreed that sufficient evidence of painful motion was present to justify the rating of 10%, as well as the presence of localized tenderness not resulting in abnormal gait or spinal contour IAW §4.59 and §4.71a.Next, members acknowledged the ROM values...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00638

    Original file (PD-2012-00638.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20010917 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1200638 BOARD DATE: 20121113 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E‐4 (63S10/Heavy Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic), medically separated for chronic mechanical low back pain (LBP). As discussed above, PEB reliance on DoDI 1332.39 and AR 635‐40 for rating the...