Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01796
Original file (PD-2013-01796.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD-2013-01796
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140624
SEPARATION DATE: 20050923


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (15Y10/AH-64D Armament/Electrical/Avionic Systems Repairer) medically separated for a back condition. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain with right leg radiculopathy,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic low back pain condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified, but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below. Any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050614
 VA - (Pending)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain 5237 10% VARD Pending -- -- --
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x - --
Combined: 10%
 Combined: ##%



ANALYSIS SUMMARY: IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

Chronic Low Back Pain. The CI reported a history of back pain since August 2004 after riding in the back of a Humvee in full battle gear. The next day he felt sharp pain in his right leg while trying to support an ammunition magazine. He continued his training mission. He was referred to chiropractor, orthopedics, physical therapy and pain management. He failed conservative treatments, including epidural injection and he was not a surgical candidate at that time. A magnetic resonance imaging study on 12 October 2004 found mild to moderate right paracentral spinal stenosis due to a right paracentral disk protrusion at the L4-5 level.

An orthopedic consultation on 3 December 2004, 9 months prior to separation, found the CI in moderate distress from back and right leg motion. He walked with an obvious gait disturbance and had trouble with flexion and extension of his back during positioning in the room. Straight leg raising test for radiculopathy was positive on the right, motor strength was 4/5 on the right, 5/5 on the left, pain to palpation over the L4-S1 region right more than left. There was painful forward flexion to approximately 70 degrees, unable to extend past neutral. At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination dated 11 May 2005, 4 months prior to separation, the CI complained of lumbar and right leg pain 3-4/10 worse with walking, jumping, lifting, driving and standing for approximately 15 minutes. Physical examination revealed lumbar spine spasm and straightening of the normal lumbar lordotic curve. Straight leg test for radiculopathy were negative bilaterally, neurologically intact and equal bilaterally, no clonus, no muscle wasting and good strength. Range-of-motion (ROM) was referenced to physical therapy done eight days prior on 3 May 2005 and summarized below. There was no VA Compensation and Pension examination in the record.

The ROM evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 Ortho 5 mos. Pre-Sep
(200 50504 )
 NARSUM 4 mos. Pre-Sep
(20050511)		 PT 4 mos. Pre-Sep
(20050503)
Flexion (90 Normal) 70 -- 80
Extension (30) 0 -- 15
R Lat Flexion (30) -- -- 20
L Lat Flexion (30) -- -- 35
R Rotation (30) -- -- 35
L Rotation (30) -- -- 35
Combined (240) -- -- 220
Comment Gait disturbance.
Painful ROM.
Pos itive R SLR.
Weaker R motor . 		Lumbar spasm.
Straightening of lumbar lordotic curve.
 Normal motor strength.		 MEB ROM
§4.71a Rating 10 % 20% 10 %

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The Board considered VASRD diagnostic code 5237 (lumbosacral or cervical strain) used by the PEB for a 10% rating. The NARSUM exam and the subsequent PT ROM, were the most proximate to separation and were considered most probative for a rating recommendation at the time of separation. The Board found evidence of lumbar spasm and straightening of the lumbar lordotic curve, for a rating of 20% based on the NARSUM examination. There were no ratable ROM limitations, no episodes of incapacitation or neurological compromise, for a higher rating under alternate or additional VASRD codes. The Board found the radiating radicular pain component was subsumed under the §4.71a code 5237 rating which states with “or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness, or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the chronic low back pain (LBP) condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5237 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Low Back Pain Condition 5237 20%
COMBINED 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131021, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150001216 (PD201301796)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00800

    Original file (PD 2012 00800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was medically separated with a 10% disability rating. The PEB rated the CI chronic LBP 10% under code 5299-5237 (lumbosacral strain) citing the ROM examination from the 21 July 2003 reported in the MEB NARSUM showing flexion greater than 60 degrees. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic Low Back Pain, Secondary to Degenerative...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00793

    Original file (PD2013 00793.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I request the review board consider: 1) the appropriate application of the VASRD rating for VA code 5237 based on the forward flexion of thoracolumbar spine documented in the NARSUM, 2) the rating of radicular pain as contributing to the unfitting condition in accordance with AR 635-40, Section 4-19f (6) (b), and 3) review all conditions identified but determined not to be unfitting by the PEB (see page 7 of NARSUM).” There is no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01413

    Original file (PD-2013-01413.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    During an examination at a VA medical center in 1 March 2001 approximately 3 years prior to separation, the CI noted “constant discomfort at the lower back at 3/10 intensity,” increasing to 6/10 with exacerbations and radiating into the left thigh and knee. In the matter of the low back pain with herniated disc condition, and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB rating, but recommends a change to VASRD code 5243, IAW the VASRD rating standards for the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00865

    Original file (PD2011-00865.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA and PEB both rated the back pain condition 10%. Notably, on the chiropractic examination with near normal lumbar flexion, these signs were absent and this examination was consistent with the post-separation C&P examination as noted above. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the contended condition; and, therefore, no additional...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00477

    Original file (PD-2014-00477.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner opined that the left worse than right S1 sensory radiculopathy and lumbar condition failed to meet retention standards.On 13 July 2006 (2 months prior to separation) the CI presented with a flare-up of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00886

    Original file (PD-2014-00886.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) neurological examination noted that initially the CI had normal lumbar x-rays and was treated with physical therapy. At the VA C&P examinations reviewed, both on the same daya year after separation, the CI’s exam noted muscle spasm and TL ROM of flexion of 40 degrees with pain to 80 degrees and a combined ROM of 225 degreesand normal sensation at the neuro exam, whereas the general exam noted only “pain with motion” with decreased LLE sensation. At the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01730

    Original file (PD-2013-01730.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA rated the service connected chronic back condition as degenerative arthritis of the spine (5242-5003) at 10% citing painful motion.Although the PEB and VA used different codes, both codes are rated under the General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine, based on limitation of thoracolumbar ROM. In the matter of the chronic back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5299-5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a.There were no other conditions...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01325

    Original file (PD2013 01325.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20040902 Available treatment records evidence a history of intermittent lower back pain which was first documented August 2000. The physical examination was normal except for tenderness to palpation throughout the neck, thoracic and lumbar spine.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02528

    Original file (PD-2013-02528.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back condition, characterized as “persistent L5 radiculopathy”, was the forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.The Informal PEB adjudicated “persistent L5 radiculopathy failing surgical decompression”as unfitting, rated at0%,with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01966

    Original file (PD2012 01966.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    MINORITY OPINION This Board member recommends a 40% rating for severe limitation of motion of the lumbar spine based on the pain limited flexion of 10 degrees at the MEB NARSUM exam and pain limited flexion of 30 degrees at the VA C&P exam. The MEB NARSUM exam documented lumbar flexion that was limited to only 10 degrees by pain, which indicates a severe limitation of motion. Although the VA C&P examination was after separation, it was actually closer in time to the date of separation, and...