Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01776
Original file (PD-2013-01776.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2013-01776
BRANCH OF SERVICE: nAVY  BOARD DATE: 20140613
SEPARATION DATE: 20051031


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Reserve AME2/E-5 (Aviation Structural Mechanic) medically separated for low back pain (LBP) with a herniated disk. The back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Displacement of lumbar intervertebral disc without myelopathy, characterized as not meeting retention standards, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated LBP with herniated disc as unfitting rated 20%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB), but later accepted the IPEB findings and withdrew his demand for a FPEB. The CI was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Rated 90% disability rating with a permanent 100% disability evaluation for my service connected disabilities, because I am unable to work. Also a 100% disability rating from social security,”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. The conditions which were later service-connected by the VA (posttraumatic stress disorder, right shoulder and erectile dysfunction) were not identified by the PEB and thus are not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any condition or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20050822
 VA* - ( ~6 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Low Back with Herniated Disc 5237 20% Intervertebral Disc Syndrome, Lumbar Spine 5243 20% 20060424
Left Sciatic Nerve Deficit Associated with Intervertebral Disc Syndrome 8520 10% 20060424
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 0 20060424
Rating: 20%
 Combined: 30%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 60724 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ))


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back with Herniated Disc: Service treatment records (STR) show the CI developed LBP after carrying an inflatable raft and lifting a tow bar in the 1999. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study was conducted in August 2001 finding mild central canal stenosis and lower back discs without nerve compression. The condition progressed despite nonsurgical treatment with development of intermittent numbness in the lower legs. An MRI study obtained in May 2003, revealed bulging discs in the lower back. From that time to the narrative summary (NARSUM) in June 2005, the CI was examined on multiple occasions. On these examinations range-of-motion (ROM), flexion of the back (normal: 90 degrees) was generally reduced (65 degrees, flexion to 12 inches from floor) but motor, sensory and reflex exams were normal. At the MEB/ NARSUM evaluation on 22 June 2005, 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported back pain with motion and constant numbness in in both legs, left greater than right. The MEB physical exam noted a normal gait. Flexion of the back was described as “limited” with the CI able to forward flex to within 8 inches of the floor. Reflex and neurovascular exams were normal. The VARD, performed on 24 July 2006, quoted data from the C&P exam in its rating discussions. The data quoted: antalgic gait with normal spine curvature, flexion of 40 degrees limited by pain without back spasm and no reported episodes of incapacitation in the prior 12-month period.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the back condition 20%, code 5237 and (lumbosacral strain). The VA rated the condition 20%, code 5243, (intervertebral disc syndrome), citing flexion of 40 degrees with pain. Under both codes IAW § 4.71a, a rating of 20 %, requires flexion of the lumbosacral spine greater than 30 degrees, but not greater than 60 degrees. The next higher rating, 40%, requires flexion of the lumbar spine of 30 degrees or less. The VA adjudicated an additional 10% rating, code 8520 (incomplete paralysis, sciatic nerve-mild), IAW §4.124, citing sensory defects in the left lower leg. The Board unanimously agreed that the evidence in the STR supported a rating of 20%, but no higher, for decreased range of motion of the lumbosacral spine IAW §4.71a. The Board considered a rating IAW §4.124 (neuralgia, peripheral nerve). The Board agreed there was no evidence for ratable peripheral nerve impairment in this case, since the preponderance of evidence in record showed that no motor weakness was present and sensory symptoms had no functional implication. The Board considered a rating under code 5243, incapacitating episodes/intervertebral disc syndrome. An incapacitating episode is defined as a period of acute signs and symptoms due to intervertebral disc syndrome that requires bed rest prescribed and treated by a physician. The record documents no incapacitation under this definition in the 12 month period prior to the MEB examination. The Board agreed that no rating could be recommended under this code. The Board found no other appropriate codes for consideration. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the back condition.

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131022, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review




MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECR E T ARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF R E V I EW BOARDS
Subj: PHYSI C AL D I SABILI T Y B O ARD OF REVIEW ( PDBR) RE C OMMEN D A T I ONS
Ref:    (a) DoDI 6040.44
         (b) CORB ltr dtd 20 J an 15

I n acco r da n ce with reference ( a ) , I have revi e wed t h e ca s es f o rward e d by reference ( b), a n d, for the r easons p r o vided in their f o rwardi n g memora n dums, appr o ve the recommendatio n s o f the PDBR t h at the f o ll o wing i n dividual' s r e c o rds n o t be c orrected to refl e ct a cha n ge in eit h er characterizati o n o f s eparati o n or in the disability rati n g p r evio u s ly assigned b y the Dep a rtment of t h e Navy' s Physical Evaluation Board:

-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , XXX XX XXXX, former U S N
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX XX XXXX, former USMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX XX XXXX, f o rmer USN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , XXX XX XXXX , former U SMC
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX XX XXXX , f o rmer U SN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXX XX XXXX, former USN



                                                              



XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 Assistant Gen e ral Counsel
( Manp o wer & R e serve Affai r s )


Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01425

    Original file (PD-2013-01425.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Anesthesia consult pain clinic.”The CI underwent back surgery on 20 December 2002, 4 months after separation to decompress the left S1 nerve root. The CI noted constant lower back and “radicular pain of the left lower extremity extending to the foot, as well as paresthesias of the left foot only with stress,” the NARSUM noted some motor weakness in the left quadriceps (L4-5) and the neurosurgical note of 20 December 2002 stated “intractable left lower extremity pain” as the basis for going...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00648

    Original file (PD2012-00648.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    L3/4 and L4/5 Disc Herniation Status Post Laminectomy (Low Back Pain) Condition [Including Associated Lower Back Conditions]. Post-Sep 80⁰ 30⁰ - - 30⁰ 30⁰ - “Mild motion”; + spasm; X-ray: reversal of the the lumbar spine 20% curvature of limitation of At the MEB examination, dictated 5 months prior to separation, the CI reported pain in his back radiating to his buttocks and hamstrings, without weakness. 3 PD1200648 RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01225

    Original file (PD2010-01225.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The informal PEB adjudicated “Herniated Disc L5-S1” condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with the disability code of 5237 with probable application of the SECNAVINST 1850.4E and Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00470

    Original file (PD 2014 00470.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain due to back injury with findings of a disc protrusion at L5/S1” as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060421VA -(3 Days Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP w/ disc protrusion at L5/S1523710%L5/S1...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01162

    Original file (PD 2013 01162.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The lumbar spine condition, characterized as “lumbar degenerative disc disease and spondylolysis with low back pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. CI CONTENTION : “ At the time of my evaluation it was determined that I had several problems with my lower back. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02450

    Original file (PD-2013-02450.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The MEB physical exam noted decreased sensation in the right lower leg and foot but no motor weakness.The NARSUM examiner reported that the CI “could not flex his trunk greater than 30 degrees without pain,”but did not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01375

    Original file (PD-2013-01375.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. He rated his pain 4/10. DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02528

    Original file (PD-2013-02528.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back condition, characterized as “persistent L5 radiculopathy”, was the forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.The Informal PEB adjudicated “persistent L5 radiculopathy failing surgical decompression”as unfitting, rated at0%,with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02591

    Original file (PD-2013-02591.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Back Pain Condition . SLR bilaterally; Normal strength,...