Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01375
Original file (PD-2013-01375.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01375
BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY  BOARD DATE: 20150116
SEPARATION DATE: 20040802


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (Shore Base Airport and Aircraft Firefighter) medically separated for a lumbar spine condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Rating or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty (LIMDU) for L4/5 degenerative disk disease and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “Lumbar Spondylosis with Degenerative Disk Disease” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated the condition as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040623
 VA - (1 Month Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Lumbar Spondylosis with Degenerative Disks 5243 10% Degenerative Disk Disease of the Lumbar Spine 5243-5003 10% 20040715
Other x 0
Other x 1
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 40909 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).




ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Lumbar Spondylosis with Degenerative Disks. Treatment records note that CI hurt his back while lifting a basketball goal in the hanger deck to mount it. He presented to Orthopedics Clinic May 1999, reporting sharp and burning pain that went across the back and buttock in a bilateral and equal distribution. He rated his pain 4/10. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine from April 1999 showed an old L1-2 compression fracture resultant kyphosis and degenerative changes at that level as well as L4-5 with a question of a posterior spot that could be a tear. He was placed on 6-month LIMDU and referred to physical therapy with a trial of an anti-inflammatory medication. In July 2000, he presented to Orthopedics Clinic reporting a recurrence of low back pain (LBP) consequent with his duty on the flight deck, lifting heavy objects and doing prolonged standing and bending work. Repeat MRI showed a large central disc bulge at L4-5 with no nerve root involvement. He was placed on LIMDU for 8 months and physical therapy and anti-inflammatory medication were recommended. Treatment records were silent until he presented to the emergency room on September, 2003 with back pain radiating down the legs. He could not sit or stand for long periods. Lumbar strain and right sciatica were diagnosed. Three months later he went to Pain clinic with chronic mid LBP, exacerbated by Hurricane clean up and rated between 3 to 6/10.

At the narrative summary dated 4 March 2004, the CI reported he had pain 60% in his back that radiated to both anterior thighs (left greater than right). On physical exam, he stood listed to the left and had mild spasm in his paraspinal muscles. Forward flexion was limited secondary to pain. Deep tendon reflexes and sensory exam were normal. Straight leg tests went to 75 degrees bilaterally. “He was able to walk on his toes and tiptoes without difficulty.” MRI showed a herniated disc with mild mass effect at the left S1 nerve root. He had two steroid injections in the back without relief. The non-medical assessment, dated June 2004, indicated the CI’s back problems precluded him from being able to perform his duties. He had not missed any work as scheduled.

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam dated 15 July 2004 performed 3 weeks prior to separation; the CI reported he had back pain discomfort with bending, twisting, heavy lifting, and standing and sitting for long periods. He denied lower extremity pains, bowel or bladder dysfunction, decreased muscle strength, or gait disturbance. Pain was constant and rated 2-3/10. Physical exam revealed a normal posture and gait. Exam of the lumbar spine showed no appreciable radiating pain on movement, muscle spasm or tenderness. Straight leg raise was negative bilaterally and there were no signs of radiculopathy. Range-of-motion revealed flexion at 90 degrees (normal 90), extension at 30 degrees (normal 30), right and left lateral flexion at 30 degree (normal 30), and right and left rotation at 30 degrees (normal 30), without ankylosing or pain. There was no limitation by fatigue, weakness, lack of endurance, or incoordination. There was no intervertebral disc syndrome. Muscle strength was 5/5 bilaterally. The VARD assigned a disability rating of 10%.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 10% rating under the 5243 code (intervertebral disc syndrome) while the VA rated the condition 10%, coded 5243-5003. There were no periods of physician prescribed bed rest for any rating under the Formula for Rating Intervertebral Disc Syndrome Based on Incapacitating Episodes (5243). The VA exam was more comprehensive and closer to separation and had the highest probative value for rating. That exam was consistent with the totality of the record and warranted a 10% rating under the general spine formula. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the lumbar spondylosis with degenerative disks condition.

The Board finally deliberated if additional disability was justified for peripheral nerve impairment. The CI had symptoms of intermittent radiating pain to his anterior thighs. However, there were no complaints of muscle problems, and objective peripheral nerve, muscle strength, and reflex testing was normal. The presence of functional impairment with a direct impact on fitness is the key determinant in the Board’s decision to recommend any condition for rating as additionally unfitting. Pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness, or aching is rated under the general formula for the spine and was considered in the 5243 rating above. There was insufficient evidence in this case of functional impairment attributable to peripheral neuropathy that adversely impacted duty performance. The Board therefore concluded that no peripheral nerve (radiculopathy) condition could be recommended for additional disability rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the lumbar spondylosis condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130915, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS
 Subj:    PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATION
Ref:     (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd XX Jun 15

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual's records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy' s Physical Evaluation Board:

-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , former USN
-        XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN







XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Assistant General Counsel (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01985

    Original file (PD-2014-01985.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the VASRD rules for rating the spine in effect at the time of separation thoracic and lumbar spine conditions coded IAW §4.71a are provided a single disability rating and thus the thoracic DDD and the lumbago (listed by the PEB as separate conditions) are subsumed in the §4.71a rating that follows. Since the disability due only to the left foot cannot be isolated by the clinical evidence or from the fitness implications of the bilateral condition, the Board consensus was that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00262

    Original file (PD-2014-00262.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Region…No Motor Neurologic Deficits5299-524210%Degenerative Arthritis Of The Lumbar Spine524210% * 20080312Other x 3 (Not In Scope)Other x 4 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01840

    Original file (PD-2013-01840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the low back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00814

    Original file (PD 2014 00814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Anterior Lumbar Fusion524120%Low Back Strain with Sciatica5243-523720%20100128Left Leg Numbness Associated with Low Back Strain with Sciatica852010%20100128L5-S1 Herniated DiskCategory IISee Above20100128MicrodiskectomyCategory IISee Above20100128Other x1 (Not in Scope)Other x520100111 Combined: 20%Combined: 70%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20100420 (most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The PEB...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00044

    Original file (PD-2014-00044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20070302 The VA coded the back condition as 5243 (Intervertebral disc syndrome) and rated at 10%.The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” The exams proximate to separation did not document limitation of ROM, but both exams documented painful motionwhich would...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00385

    Original file (PD2012 00385.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the CI experienced radiating pain, this is subsumed under the general spine rating criteria, which specifically states “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates).”There was no motor impairment present on any exam that could be linked to functional deficit or limitation of specific physical requirements. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01394

    Original file (PD-2013-01394.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease without Neurologic Deficit .Service treatment records showed the CI deployed to Iraq from September 2004-September 2005. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00553

    Original file (PD2009-00553.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The case was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), he was determined unfit for continued Naval service, and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy/Marine Corps and Department of Defense regulations in effect at that time. The most complete examination available for review is the Physical Medicine Consult from 20021009 which clearly stated the pain was intermittent. The Board also considered the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01977

    Original file (PD2012 01977.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SCOPEOFREVIEW : TheBoard’sscopeofreviewisdefinedinDoDI6040.44, Enclosure3, paragraph5.e.(2). RATINGCOMPARISON : ServiceIPEB– Dated20060123 VA- (3Mos.Pre-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic LBP Secondary toDDDw/L4-5,L5-S1DiscBulge& Facet Arthropathy, w/oNeurologic Deficit, ROM Limited by Pain, Positive 5299-5242 10% SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130019923 (PD201201977)I have reviewed the enclosed...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00007

    Original file (PD2011-00007.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates Department of Veterans’ Affairs (VA) evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. The exams were the MEB exam, the physical therapy (PT) range of motion evaluation and the VA compensation and pension (C&P) exam. All three exams documented painful motion, with both the physical therapy and the C&P exam...