Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01579
Original file (PD-2013-01579.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     C ASE: PD - 201 3 -0 1579
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0325
Separation Date: 20031109


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-3 (Trainee) medically separated for a right foot condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his M ilitary Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards . He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The right foot condition, characterized as “right foot acquired flat foot secondary to previous Lisfanc joint sprain with delayed diagnosis , ” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The I nformal PEB adjudicated “right foot acquired flat foot following Lisfranc joint sprain” as unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “My broken right foot at the arch caused by a sudden impact permanently disfigured my right foot exasperated by doctor’s failure to realize foot broken until my arrival at Fort Sam (SATX) for AIT. Now my foot is causing a permanent progressive degenerative lower back condition. A cause of much pain.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


invalid font number 31502


RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20031007
 VA - (2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Right Foot Acquired Flat Foot following Lisfranc Joint Sprain 5276 0% Pes Planovalgus of the Right Foot with Calcaneal Heel Spur… 5299-5276 20% 20040127
Other x0
 Other x3
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20040614 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])


ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

Right Foot Acquired Flat Foot following Lisfranc Joint Sprain Condition . The CI developed right foot pain after stumbling on an obstacle course in November 2002. His foot was plantar flexed and he jammed the tip of his toes when it was caught between logs . The m edical provider noted swelling and pain with bruising on the bottom and side the right foot as well. He was diagnosed with a foot sprain and advised that time would heal the pain. The physical therapist (PT) noted right foot chronic pain and that the foot appeared to have lost the longitudinal ar ch. The PT referred the CI to o rthopedics. Bone scans demonstrated stress - related change in the metatarsophalangeal (MP) joints of the right foot , bilateral shin splints and stress changes in the right calcaneus . M agnetic resonance imaging showed mild tenosynovitis . The Orthopedist noted right foot pain and pes planus with a right Lisfranc sprain. The examiner ordered a molded soft arch support for the shoe and he discussed possible surgical options. The MEB narrative summary exam a month prior to separation documented that the CI had only mild pain when he did not run. There were physical exam findings of a moderately decreased arch and an acquired flat foot on the right without discrete tenderness to palpation, swelling or edema. There was no evidence of any fracture or stress changes. T he VA Compensation and Pension exam approximately 2 months after separation documented that at rest, the CI had right foot pain, stiffness and swelling. He also had functional impairments of an inability to run, jump or perform weight bearing activities. There were physical exam findings of moderate pes planus and forefoot/mid - foot mal - alignment , and moderate tenderness to palpation of the sole of his right foot. A right foot X -ray showed a severe pes planovagal deformity, a small posterior heel spur and minimal degenerative arthritic change in the first MP joint.

The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the right foot acquired flat foot following Lisfranc joint sprain as 5276 (acquired f latfoot) and rated at 0% citing “mild.” The VA coded the pes planovalgus of the right foot with calcaneal heel spur and plantar fasciitis condition as 5299 analogous to 5276 and rated at 20%. The Board reviewed the “severe” ( 20% ) rating criteria as granted by the VA and agreed that the evidence does not support that marked deformity, swelling on use, and characteristic callosities were present at the time of separation . The Board deliberated if the CI’s right foot condition was closer to the 10% or 0% disability level under analogous coding of 5276. Given the CI’s persistent tenderness and failure of custom ache supports to relieve his symptoms, the Board adjudged that the CI’s right foot condition exceeded “mild” and more closely reflected the “moderate,” 10% , disability rating . The Board also considered application of VASRD code 5284 (other foot injuries) but adjudged that the CI’s level of disability did not meet the subjective “moderately severe” level as required for the 20% rating level. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the right foot acquired flat foot following Lisfranc joint sprain condition coded 5299-5 276 .

BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the right foot acquired flat foot following Lisfranc joint sprain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10 %, coded 5299-5276 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Right Foot Acquired Flat Foot following Lisfranc Joint Sprain 5299-5276 1 0%
COMBINED 1 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130926 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record




XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


invalid font number 31502


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150011086 (PD201301579)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




 Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                            (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00184

    Original file (PD-2014-00184.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Pain Bilateral Thighs, Ankles, and Feet5099-500310%Chronic Right Ankle Sprain…527110%20061107Chronic Left Ankle Sprain…527110%20061107Bilateral Pes...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00592

    Original file (PD2009-00592.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for the Sinus Tarsi Syndrome condition, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations. The CI was separated on 20020814 for Sinus Tarsi Syndrome with chronic bilateral foot and ankle pain rated analogously as code 5279, Metatarsalgia, anterior, (Morton’s Disease), unilateral or bilateral, which assigns...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01817

    Original file (PD-2013-01817.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The rating for the unfitting chronic recurrent plantar fasciitis bilaterally and equinus deformity bilaterally conditions are addressed below;no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. When considering a separate rating for each condition, the Board considers each bundled condition to be reasonably justified as separately unfitting unless a preponderance of evidence indicates the condition would not cause the member to be referred into the Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01004

    Original file (PD-2014-01004.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The examiner opined that the physical findings were“ consistent with more than a moderate deformity.” The examiner noted that the radiologist described the February 2008 X-rays indicative of moderate bilateral pes planus deformity; however the examiner opined that the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01675

    Original file (PD2012 01675.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB, when specifically requested by the CI. Back pain, along with foot pain, was mentioned in a sick call note in 1999, although the entry elaborated only the foot complaint. An individual with a complaint of chronic low back pain, a normal objective examination, and normal objective testing is normally not referred...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01282

    Original file (PD-2013-01282.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Pes Planus with History of Plantar Fasciitis5299-52760%Left Plantar Fasciitis527610%20040602Right Plantar Fasciitis527610%20040602Other X 0 (Not in Scope)Other x1520040602 Combined: 0%Combined: 50%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20041027(most proximate to date of separation) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board acknowledges the presence of “breathing problems, sleep apnea, depression, knees” as sevice-connected conditions by the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01412

    Original file (PD-2013-01412.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Right Foot Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the right foot condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01735

    Original file (PD-2013-01735.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI.The rating for the unfitting bilateral plantar fasciitis condition is addressed below.The requested low back condition, which was determined to be not unfitting by the PEB, is likewise addressed below.The requested posttraumatic stress disorder condition was not identified by...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00636

    Original file (PD2011-00636.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Foot Condition . Secondly, the congenital pes planus condition itself was not service-aggravated; rather, the painful complications of plantar fasciitis and/or tendinitis were the service-acquired and unfitting conditions (e.g., subject to disability rating). In the matter of the bilateral plantar fasciitis condition, the Board unanimously recommends that each foot be separately adjudicated as follows: an unfitting right plantar fasciitis condition coded 5399-5310 and rated 10%;...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02184

    Original file (PD-2013-02184.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Bilateral Plantar Fasciitis5399-53100%Pes Planus With Plantar Fasciitis, Bilateral527610%20010604*Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 0 Rating: 0%Rating: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20020118 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). The Board concluded the evidence supported the minimal compensable rating under §4.40 (functional loss), coded 5299-5276.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence...