Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01517
Original file (PD-2013-01517.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-01517
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS  BOARD DATE: 20141203
SEPARATION DATE: 20040630


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCPL/E-3 (3051/Warehouse Clerk) medically separated for conversion disorder. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The conversion disorder condition, characterized as “conversion disorder (mild-moderate)” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition (migraine headaches). The Informal PEB adjudicated “conversion disorder” as unfitting, rated at 10%, with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were determined to be C ategory III condition. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “conversion disorder w/mixed presentations and anxiety have gotten worse where it affect by day to day activities. I have problems with my balance. Sometimes I have numbness in my feet and legs. I have pain through my body. I am always tense have racing thoughts. Also have homicidal thoughts, and I sometimes revert to cutting myself when I feel a need to. I still have tremors (secures) from time to time. I have heart palpitations, always worrying sweating and depression. Sometimes I can’t sleep because I am paranoid or my negative thoughts keep me awake.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting conversion disorder condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040414
 VA - (4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Conversion Disorder 9424 10% Conversion Disorder 9424 30% 20041015
Migraine Headaches Cat III Migraine Headaches 8100 0% 20041021
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 0
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50511 (most proximate to date of separation )



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Conversion Disorder Condition. The CI was evaluated in the emergency room (ER) on 11 November 2003 for episodes of shaking over a 2-week period. The CI reported she had episodes of shaking of the arms and legs in her sleep and when awake. Physical examination was normal except she had “myoclonic jerks” during the exam. The ER examiner noted the CI shook only when she was being observed. She was referred to psychiatry for evaluation. She was diagnosed with a movement disorder and conversion/anxiety disorder was rule out. The following day at the psychological evaluation, the CI reported she had experienced shaking after the delivery of her baby who was now 30 days old and living with her parents. The symptoms lasted for one day but re-appeared in the prior 2 weeks after an argument with her boyfriend, now husband of 3 days. After the argument she and boyfriend came close to ending the relationship. The CI noted her symptoms involved upper body movements with extensive flapping of the hands and some lower torso movements. During her mental status examination (MSE) the CI exhibited upper body movement and stated her mood was irritated and tired. All other aspects of the examination were unremarkable. The psychologist recorded the diagnosis of conversion disorder with mixed presentation (provisional) and reported a Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) score of 45 (serious). Neurology consultation dated 1 December 2003 recorded a normal neurological examination. The neurologist opined the symptoms were consistent with a conversion disorder. However, she was started on anti-epileptic medication and had received medication for sleep issues. The record demonstrated the CI participated in talk therapy and possibly hypnotherapy. She continued to have “jerks” that was not responsive to anti-epileptic or neuroleptic (anti-psychotic) medications. Neurology entry dated 9 January 2004 noted jerking at the initiation of the physical examination that terminated once the examination ended. Motor examination was difficult to perform due to “large, dramatic arm, head, and body jerks associated with dystonic voluntary movements, fisting and extending of the arms when reflexes were being examined.” There were no clinical findings. The physician explained to the CI and her husband (accompanied her to the appointment) that the symptoms were psychologically based. The diagnosis of conversion disorder was recorded.

At the narrative summary (NARSUM) performed on 2 February 2004, the psychiatrist noted the CI had extensive work-up to identify organic (physical) causes for her symptoms and none had been identified. Blood chemistry evaluation was normal including tests to detect thyroid abnormalities. The CI had a normal CT brain scan. The diagnosis of conversion disorder was confirmed in November 2003. The CI was absent from work for a short period of time in November, but was prescribed medications for sleep that improved her symptoms to where she was able to return to work with some duty restrictions. The examiner indicated the CI’s motor behaviors had interfered with her ability to stand in formation. MSE noted no abnormalities in mood, affect, speech or thought processes. There were mild motor/behavioral abnormalities. A GAF of 65 (mild) was recorded, and returning to full duty was not recommended. The psychologist indicated the CI’s symptoms were directly related to the perceived stressor. Her condition was documented as mild-moderate.

A month later the CI was admitted to psychiatry inpatient after an episode of disruptive and self-injurious behaviors (slapping self in the face) at work. She reportedly became agitated and was escorted to mental health. She was discharged the following day with the admission related diagnosis of acute adjustment reaction. The CI was seen again in the ER on 28 March 2004 secondary to jerking symptoms. She was triaged to psychiatry who noted all of the biological laboratory studies had been normal (TSH, B12, folate, CBC, etc.) and the CI had continued anti-anxiety and neuroleptic medication. She no longer took the anti-epileptic medication. The psychiatrist documented the CI reported she was able to go to work “mostly” without problems, except some minimal jerking behavior. Her GAF was 55 and the diagnosis of conversion (pseudo seizures) continued.

At the VA Compensation and Pension mental evaluation on 15 October 2004, approximately 4 months after separation, the CI reported a history of one inpatient psychiatry admission in 2004 (24 hours), briefly took anti-epileptic medication and had completely discontinued all medication because they did not improve her symptoms. The examiner noted the CI had no record of treatment for her condition since separation and had not worked since separation, primarily due to pregnancy. She reported a history of abuse from the father of her child and noted she had given him custody and felt guilty about her decision. Her current husband was supportive and attended appointments with her. The CI had continued to have episodes, primarily at night, but also had 3-4 times per week during the daytime. The MSE was unremarkable, and a GAF of 65 (mild) was recorded.

The Board directed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB and VA chose the same coding option , code 9424 (conversion disorder) , but assigned different rating s. The PEB rated the condition at 10%, and the VA assigned a 30% rating. The Board first unanimously agreed that VASRD §4.129 was inapplicable in this in the absence of a highly stressful causative event. The NARSUM examination was 4 months before separation and the VA examination was 4 months after separation; both assessed the GAF score at 65 (mild symptoms but generally functioning well) . The Board considered if there was evidence for a §4.130 rating higher than 10% at the time of separation. A rating of 30% requires “occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks . ” The records noted the CI had discontinued her medications after separation and had continued to experience pseudo seizures at or near same intensity when she received medication and therapy. Her GAF remained the same. There was no evidence in the record of recurrent suicidal behaviors or panic attacks. The CI was hospitalized once for behavioral issues not related to the pseudo-seizures and was seen in the ER twice for pseudoseizures. M edication and psychotherapy provided limited benefit. The majority of her MSEs were normal. Although t he c ommander’s statement noted the CI had been absent from duty approx imately 30 hours weekly due to treatment, evaluation and / or recuperation , the record recorded only one reported work place incident not associated with her diagnosed condition ( after becoming agitated, she was slapping self in face, throwing chairs) . The inpatient psychiatrist noted the CI reported she had minimal pseudo-seizure behaviors at work (minimal jerking), the NARSUM recorded the condition was transient and mild to moderate in severity. The Board noted the pseudo seizure episodes appeared to have presented in response to specific stressors, were transient, and seemed to have occurred only in situations where others we re in the position to assist or come to her aid. Four months after separation she remained chronically stable with no visits to the ER or psychiatric hospitalizations. She was expecting a baby and was not taking psychotropic medications. All Board members agreed the condition at the time of separation was best reflected in the 1 0% rating . Thereupon, after due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the conversion disorder condition. invalid font number 31502


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the conversion disorder condition and IAW VASRD §4.130, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131007, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
         DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

                 






MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 29 Apr 15

In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandums, approve the recommendations of the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC
- XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN


                                                      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                            Assistant General Counsel
                                                      (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00596

    Original file (PD-2012-00596.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At that time the PEB determined her condition to be in remission, and adjudicated conversion disorder as permanently unfitting, rated 0% with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Conversion Disorder Condition. The impairment for social and industrial adaptability due to the conversion disorder and personality disorder was considered to be “definite,” and for major depressive disorder, “mild.” She was discharged from the hospital on one...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01600

    Original file (PD2012 01600.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB assigned a 10% rating for the conversion disorder, factitious disorder condition coded 9434; and listed pseudoseizures and malingering as related conditions.The VA assigned a 100% rating for partial onset seizures under an analogous 8910 code (epilepsy, grand mal); and a 10% rating for adjustment disorder with anxiety citing treatment for an adjustment disorder in 2001.The C&P examiner and VA neurology consultant both expressed uncertainty about the neurologic vs. psychiatric...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02202

    Original file (PD-2013-02202.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At TDRL entry, the PEB rated the condition of conversion disorder, coded 9424, at 10%. The Board further recommends a 30% permanent disability rating for the condition of somatization disorder. TDRL neurology removal examination dated 3 February 2006, approximately 17 months after TDRL entry, recorded decreased sensory in left digits four and five, and pain on palpation of the surgical scar.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01298

    Original file (PD2010-01298.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION: The CI states, “I am rated at 100% combined through the VA with a rating of 30% for conversion disorder (the diagnosis from the Army for my medical discharge). As noted above, the Army PEB rated the CI’s mental condition at 10%. In September 2004, physical therapy (PT) reported that the LLE weakness was characteristic of psychogenic weakness due to inconsistencies during testing.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02121

    Original file (PD-2014-02121.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A neurology evaluation performed on 1March 2005 as part of his pain evaluation. The chest wall pain was diagnosed as costo-chondritis and the left upper arm pain was secondary to both a blood clot and a neuropathy of the ulnar nerve. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00138

    Original file (PD2009-00138.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was stated that he will continue to have these episodes as before and should be considered unfit. The PEB determined the CI was unfit for Conversion disorder and rated it at 10%. In their rating rationale, the VA stated the CI had improved after separating from service and they rated his disability at 10%.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01915

    Original file (PD2012 01915.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He reported headaches for a short time afterwards that subsided after recovering.The CI also reported being placed on medication for seizure prevention but that he never had a seizure and the medication was discontinued 6 months after injury. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02593

    Original file (PD-2013-02593.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At the neurology evaluation for the MEB examination dated 2 August 2004, the examiner noted that the video EEG recorded no epileptic activity during her episodes and she was subsequently diagnosed with psuedoseizures. The CI reported that she has had one seizure since...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01536

    Original file (PD 2012 01536.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the conversion disorder manifested by subjective left lower extremity weakness and sensory deficits as unfitting, rated 10%. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF Acting Director Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD-ZB / xxxxxxxxxxx),...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00156

    Original file (PD2012-00156.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The conditions chronic neck pain, right shoulder pain and “seizure” like activity (conversion disorder) as requested for consideration meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and, are addressed below. In the matter of the chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5241 IAW VASRD §4.71a. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with...