Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01398
Original file (PD-2013-01398.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX       CASE: PD-2013-01398
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20150317
SEPARATION DATE: 20041116


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-2 (Aircraft Armament Systems Apprentice) medically separated for low back pain. The low back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Air Force Specialty. He was issued a temporary P4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The “grade I spondylolisthesis with bilateral pars defect,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic lower back pain associated with grade I spondylolisthesis” as a Category I unfitting condition, rated 10%, c iting application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI requested a Formal PEB, but later rescinded that request and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Condition has worsened over last 10 years with repetitive work.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20040421
 VA* - (~5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Lower Back Pain Associated with Grade I Spondylolisthesis 5239 10% Grade 1 Spondylolisthesis (also Claimed as L5-S2 with Bilateral Par Defect) Unknown 10% 20050425
Thoracic Sprain Unknown NSC 20050425
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 0
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50511 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ) .



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Pain with Grade I Spondylolisthesis. The record and narrative summary (NARSUM) indicated that the CI had constant low and mid back pain with increase on activity and with pain radiating up his back. There was no leg pain reported. Radiographs documented Grade I spondylolisthesis at L5 on S1 with a bilateral pars defect. Physical therapy, multiple trials of medications, nerve blocks and radiofrequency ablation did not relieve the symptoms or allow return to full duty due to lifting restrictions. On orthopedic examination 10 months prior to separation (referenced and summarized in the NARSUM) the CI had a normal gait, had negative straight leg raise testing (for radicular signs), was able to stand on his heels and to squat. He had pain-limited range-of-motion (ROM) with forward flexion to fingertips touching the ankles, extension to 10 degrees (normal 30) and other axis of movement all having a “10% loss.” Reflexes and lower extremity sensory and strength exams were normal. A treatment note from 4 months prior to separation documented moderate muscle spasm with 70% of normal forward flexion and a normal gait. In his letter of exception to the PEB, the CI noted back spasms and pain radiating into his neck area.

At the VA Compensation and Pension exam performed 5 months after separation, the CI reported increasing pain with sitting and that the low back pain had become intermittent. He was taking no medications, but had a lifting restriction. He denied prescribed bed rest for his back condition. On exam, gait was normal and ROM was with pain to at least the VASRD normal limits for each axis of movement (forward flexion 90 degrees/combined 240 degrees), with no decrease following repetition. Spine contour was normal and there was normal sensory, reflex and strength testing.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. No service exams used a goniometer IAW VASRD §4.46 (accurate measurement). The NARSUM “fingertips to ankle” was adjudged as near normal ROM (greater than 60 degrees) as was the single exam documenting muscle spasm with “70% normal” forward flexion. The comprehensive VA exam was the most comprehensive and included assessment following repetition of motion. All exams in evidence warranted a 10% rating for painful or pain limited motion using the general rating formula for the spine for forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 60 degrees or combined ROM of greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235 degrees. There was evidence of occasional muscle spasm or tenderness that did not result in abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour which is also in the 10% criteria range. Pain, whether or not it radiates, is considered under the general spine formula, and there was no evidence of any lower extremity motor or sensory loss (non-pain radiculopathy) for any potential peripheral nerve rating. There was no evidence of intervertebral disc disease or physician prescribed bed rest to warrant a higher rating. Considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), members agreed that a disability rating of 10% for the low back condition was appropriately recommended in this case.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the low back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130912, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record








        
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAF/MRB
1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700
Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762

Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX :
        
Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Section 1554, 10 USC), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-01398 .
         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

 Sincerely,





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

cc:
SAF/MRBR

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01947

    Original file (PD-2012-01947.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the April 2006 MEB exam, forward flexion was 50 degrees. After a thorough review of the evidence, the Board determined that a disability rating of 20% was appropriate. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02682

    Original file (PD-2013-02682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Chronic Back Pain . The diagnoses of lumbar radiculitis involving the right L4-L5 nerve roots, spondylolisthesis (degenerative versus congenital), and lumbar spinal stenosis, severe at L4-L5-S1 on the right, were recorded.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00429

    Original file (PD2012-00429.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the non-radicular chronic LBP with L4/5 herniated disc and L5 Grade I spondylolisthesis conditions as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20070816 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam 5299-5237 10% Spondylolisthesis of the Lumbar Spine 5239 0% 20080213 Condition Non-radicular Chronic Low Back Pain with L4/5 Herniated Disc and L5 Grade I...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00325

    Original file (PD-2014-00325.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2014-00325 BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE BOARD DATE: 20141031 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. A VA exam performed in December 2008, (over 3 years remote from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00116

    Original file (PD2009-00116.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    VA initial rating used the Service treatment records with limited range of motion, with limited ROM, with flexion 45/45, extension 20/45, rotation 40/80 on the right and 30/80 on the left with painful motion shown. The VA rated the knee at 10% based on Service treatment records showing limited range of motion, with flexion to 130/140˚. Commander's memo specifically noted neck and back pain as unfitting and did not include any duty limitations due to CI's right knee.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00746

    Original file (PD2012-00746.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Low Back Condition. The PEB and VA chose different coding options for the low back condition, but used the 2002 Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) for rating the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation. The VA’s original rating decision coded 5293-5241 analogous to the new §4.71 VASRD code 5241 (Spinal fusion) utilizing the old spine code 5293 (Intervertebral disc syndrome) for a 20% rating for moderate limitation of motion of the lumbar spine.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01412

    Original file (PD2012 01412.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB coded chronic low back pain 5295 (lumbosacral strain and pain on motion) and rated it 10% based on IAW DOD and VASRD guidelines. At the MEB exam of 25June2002 the CI reported no neck pain or cervical paresthesias. Neither charted exam was compensable based on ROM limitations.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01347

    Original file (PD-2013-01347.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB found the“chronic back pain, status post lumbar fusion” unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain, Status Post Lumbar Fusion524110%Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP)524310%20040709Bladder Dysfunction, related to HNP5243-754210%20040709Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 3 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00351

    Original file (PD-2014-00351.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00618

    Original file (PD2012 00618.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The low back condition, characterized as “spondylolisthesis (grade I),” “bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy (S1) and “degenerative disc disease L5-S1,”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) In accordance with (IAW)AR 40-501.The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain with injury”as unfitting rated at0%. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded...