Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01347
Original file (PD-2013-01347.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx         CASE: PD-2013-01347
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army         BOARD DATE: 20150619
SEPARATION DATE: 20040406


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an activated Reserve E-6 (Cargo Specialist) medically separated for low back pain. The back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS). He was issued an L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). “Herniated nucleus pulposus with radicular symptoms” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also forwarded one other condition (hypertension) for PEB adjudication. The Informal PEB found the “chronic back pain, status post lumbar fusion” unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The hypertension condition was determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: His conditions continue to worsen and negatively impact his daily activities. His complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20040225
 VA* – (~3 mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain, Status Post Lumbar Fusion 5241 10% Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) 5243 10% 20040709
Bladder Dysfunction, related to HNP 5243-7542 10% 20040709
Other MEB/PEB Conditions x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 3
RATING: 10%
 RATING: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20 040922 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) )



ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Back Pain. This CI has had a long history of low back pain (LBP). In 1989, he underwent spinal fusion at L4-L5. In 1995, he injured his back by jumping off a rail car. In 2003, he injured his back by falling down some stairs. The LBP was treated with physical therapy (PT), lumbar traction, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), anti-inflammatory drugs, and epidural steroid injections. In spite of all treatment efforts, his LBP persisted and an MEB was initiated. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) was dictated on 24 October 2003. The CI reported LBP, with pain down the left leg. On physical examination (PE), there was low back tenderness on the left, with palpable spasm. Straight leg raise (SLR) was positive, left worse than right. Neurological exam was normal. Forward flexion was 80 degrees.

The CI was medically separated on 6 April 2004. On 9 July 2004, 3 months later, he had a VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam. He reported that the LBP was constant. Occasionally, when he made a wrong move, he would have sharp, severe, radiating pain down the left leg to the toes. On PE, his gait was described as “guarded.” The spine was symmetrical in appearance, and spinal curvatures were normal. There was no spasm, and the neurological exam was normal. The range-of-motion (ROM) evaluation in evidence, which the Board relied heavily upon in arriving at its rating recommendation, is summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)		 VA C&P ~3 mos . Post-Sep
(20040709)
Flexion (90 Normal) 70
Extension (30) 10
R Lat Flexion (30) 15
L Lat Flexion (30) 15
R Rotation (30) 20
L Rotation (30) 20
Combined (240) 150
Comment with guarded gait
§4.71a Rating 20% *
       *20% disability rating based on guarded gait

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the evidence. The PEB and the VA chose different coding options for the LBP condition, but both assigned a 10% disability rating. The July 2004 C&P exam was just 3 months after the date of separation (DOS), and therefore had significant probative value. At that exam, thoracolumbar forward flexion was 70 degrees, and combined thoracolumbar ROM was 150 degrees. IAW the VASRD §4.71a General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine , a 10% rating is warranted when forward flexion is greater than 60 degrees but not greater than 85 degrees. A rating of 10% is also warranted when thoracolumbar combined ROM is greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235 degrees.

 The Board then considered the matter of the CI’s abnormal gait. At the July 2004 C&P exam, his gait was described as “guarded.” IAW the VASRD §4.71a General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine , a 20% rating is warranted when there is evidence of muscle guarding severe enough to result in abnormal gait. The Board also considered the matter of peripheral neuropathy. After reviewing all the information in the record, there was insufficient evidence of a clinically significant neuropathy that interfered with performance of military duties. The CI had neurological symptoms, but there was no performance-based evidence that the neurological condition impacted his military duties. Therefore, the Board concluded that there was no unfitting radiculopathy present at DOS. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the LBP condition. It is appropriately coded 5241, and IAW VASRD §4.71a , meets criteria for a 20% rating because of muscle guarding severe enough to result in abnormal gait.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the Chronic back pain, status post lumbar fusion, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5241, IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic back pain, status post lumbar fusion 5241 20%
COMBINED 20%



The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130909, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record




XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review





SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150012423 (PD201301347)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01781

    Original file (PD-2013-01781.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: Physical Disability Board of Review I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD 2011 00366

    Original file (PD 2011 00366.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service IPEB – Dated 20031201VA - (2 Mos. The CI continued his post-operative care with both orthopedics and physical therapy for LBP.The commander’s statement indicated that the CI was able to perform duties in-garrison as a unit mail clerk;however he was not deployabledueto his inabilityto perform his MOS duties as an Infantryman.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination(obtained approximately 8 monthsprior to separation),contains documentation that the CI had marked and frequent LBP...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02758

    Original file (PD-2013-02758.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SEPARATION DATE: 20071123 Since then, he had noted re-aggravation of his LBP. The Board noted that the ROM for both the MEB and VA examinations supports a 20% rating, but the criteria for a 40% rating are not met.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01763

    Original file (PD 2012 01763.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the matter of the chronic back pain s/p lumbar fusion condition, the Board by a 2:1 vote recommends a disability rating of 40%, coded 5241 IAW VASRD §4.71a. The examiner, however, noted the CI to walk with a ‘normal’ gait and curvature of the spine to be normal - both inconsistent with extreme limitation of spine motion from pain. The following is respectfully recommended: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Chronic Back Pain Status Post Lumbar Fusion...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01841

    Original file (PD2012 01841.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: CASE: PD1201841 BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 20130619 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00598

    Original file (PD-2014-00598.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-operatively, pain improvement was insufficient to allow return to full duties.The neurology MEB addendum examination on 21 June 2007 (6months prior to separation) noted normal lower extremity muscle strength.At the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02492

    Original file (PD-2013-02492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Low Back Pain Condition . The ROM findings rated by the MEB and VA were similar, each yielding 20% ratings under the VASRD §4.71a general spine formula.The Board also notes the earliest VA spinal evaluation was 6 yearsafter the date of Service separation.IAW DoDI 6040.44 and the post-separation time reference, the service treatment record evidence was assigned exclusive probative value with respect to the Board’s recommendations. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01819

    Original file (PD-2014-01819.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Reconsideration PEB (Recon PEB) adjudicated the same diagnosis (chronic LBP), but rated 10% disability due to service aggravation; the case was adjudicated with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Physical therapy (PT) evaluation on 19 July 2004 noted no radicular symptoms were present and the examination showed decreased ROM described as “20% limited all directions”, with pain with flexion, and positive testing for sacroiliac pain, with an...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01628

    Original file (PD-2014-01628.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. In the matter of the chronic back pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00145

    Original file (PD2013 00145.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain with s/p lumbar fusion with osteoarthritis” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board also acknowledges the CI’s contention for ratings of his sleep apnea condition which was determined by the MEB to meet retention standards. Board members finally debated the application of VASRD §4.45in this case, which allows for the next higher rating if evidence of additional functional loss after repetitive...