Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01380
Original file (PD-2013-01380.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD -20 1 3 - 0 1380
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 2014 1029
Separation Date: 200 40220


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PV2/E-2 (63B/General Motor Mechanic) medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic LBP condition, characterized as “chronic refractory lower lumbar back pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic LBP” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing AR 635-40. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “Because of back spasm and chronic lower back pain it’s hard to move sometimes and I take a lot of pills that make me sleepy so it hard to work and $129.00 is not enough to help these days.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic LBP condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20031215
 VA - (5 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic LBP 5299-5237 10% Lumbosacral Strain (claimed as degenerative disc disease L5-S1) 5237 10% 20040112
Other x0
 Other x3
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20040420 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])
invalid font number 31502

ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed in the CI’s application regarding the significant impact that his service-incurred condition has had on his current earning ability and quality of life. It is a fact, however, that the Disability Evaluation System ( DES ) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. This role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs . The Board utilizes VA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations; DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12 - month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. Post-separation evidence therefore is probative only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability and fitness implications at the time of separation.

Chronic LBP Condition . There were two range - of - motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.
Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) MEB ~ 6. 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep PT ~ 2. 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P ~ 1 . 5 Mo. Pr e -Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) Decreased flexion 30 90
Combined (240) 240
Comment Pos. tenderness to palpation (TTP) on left paraspinal region Pos. painful motion; 3/5 Pos. Waddell’s ; “Pt . reports that he has FROM, but he stopped AROM when the pain started” N ormal gait; Normal strength & sens ation ; no muscle spasm or TTP
§4.71a Rating 10 % 1 0% 0% (VA 10 % )
invalid font number 31502
The CI injured his low back in July 2005 when he attempted to move a 5 00 pound stone tras h receptacle and felt a “popping” sensation. He was evaluated in the emergency room and was noted to have paraspinal TTP at the L2-4 level. He was diagnosed with acute LBP , given a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and a muscle relaxant along with a temporary p rofile for 14 days. The p rimary c are provider put the CI on Q uarters for 24 hours for acute LBP . The CI was referred to p hysical t herapy (PT) and reported that his LBP no longer hurt constantly ; however , he reported that he would have whole back muscle spasms dail y which lasted only 45 seconds. Lumbar spine X -rays performed in July 2002 showed a normal lumbar spine and coccyx . The PT diagnosed mechanical LBP and the CI followed intermittently with PT through out 2003. The o rthopedist evaluated the CI and noted persistent LBP and decreased L5 to S1 disc height. The lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated L5 to S1 disc narrowing, most likely congenital without evidence of degenerative changes, disc protrusion or extrusion. The initial c ommander’s s tatement noted that the CI was unable to perform even mildly physically demanding soldiering tasks as he had to rest every 15 minutes due to his back condition. The CI was seen in a cute c are three times during 2003 for LBP (March, May and June) . The CI was given a permanent L3 Profile for LBP . The second c ommander’s s tatement indicated that the CI continued to have an inability to perform his MOS duties due to his medical condition. The MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 6.5 months prior to separation documented that the history and physical exam results were taken from the notes of three examining physicians who were no longer available. The CI was not examined for this MEB NARSUM and the examiner was unable to contact him for an updated history. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart above. PT completed a ROM exam for the MEB exam approximately 2.5 months prior to separation and the physical exam findings are summarized in the chart above. The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 1.5 months prior to separation documented the CI continued to complain of chronic LBP with occasional radiation into both feet. He continued to require treatment with an NSAID, muscle relaxant and narcotic medications. The VA C&P physical exam findings are summarized in the chart above.
The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the c hronic LBP condition as 5299 analogous to 5237 ( l umbosacral or cervical strain ) and rated at 10% . The VA coded the l umbosacral s train (claimed as degenerative disc disease L5-S1) condition as 5237 and rated at 10%. All exams proximate to sepa ration documented chronic LBP with activity. The MEB examiner documented some TTP over the left paraspinal area. Although the ROM’s completed by PT were limit e d to 30-25-28 degrees of flexion, the PT documented that “active ROM only represents CI’s willingness to move” ; and furthermore the PT documented Waddell’s signs of positive axial loading, positive simulated trunk rotation, positive simulated straight leg raise and no tenderness to palpation with light touch. The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease . ” Both exams proximate to separation were consistent with either a 0% or 10% rating and IAW DoDI 6040.44 the Board may not recommend a lower combined rating than that conferred by PEB. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the c hronic LBP condition.


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on AR 635-40 for rating c hronic LBP was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that regulation by the Board. In the matter of the c hronic LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI's disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130910 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record





                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150004180 (PD201301380)


I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00452

    Original file (PD-2014-00452.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of my medical records will show this. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01522

    Original file (PD-2013-01522.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00213

    Original file (PD-2014-00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP523710%Lumbosacral Intervertebral Disc Syndrome524310%20070227S1 Radiculopathy Left Lower Extremity5243-852010%20070227Other x 0 (Not In Scope)Other x 0 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from VA Rating...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00793

    Original file (PD2013 00793.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I request the review board consider: 1) the appropriate application of the VASRD rating for VA code 5237 based on the forward flexion of thoracolumbar spine documented in the NARSUM, 2) the rating of radicular pain as contributing to the unfitting condition in accordance with AR 635-40, Section 4-19f (6) (b), and 3) review all conditions identified but determined not to be unfitting by the PEB (see page 7 of NARSUM).” There is no evidence of a separately ratable functional impairment (with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02665

    Original file (PD-2013-02665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION : The Board,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01225

    Original file (PD2010-01225.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The informal PEB adjudicated “Herniated Disc L5-S1” condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with the disability code of 5237 with probable application of the SECNAVINST 1850.4E and Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02437

    Original file (PD-2013-02437.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was given a U3/L3 profile for LBP and right wrist pain. The PT noted that althoughhis right wrist was showing improvement, the CI had wrist pain with pushups.The MEB NARSUM exam documented that the CI was unable to perform basic soldering duties or carry/lift more than 25 pounds or engage in repetitive gripping, bending or twisting of the right wrist.The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below. The VA coded the arthropathy of right wrist condition as 5003...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00463

    Original file (PD 2014 00463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition was not considered by the PEB. The pain was rated at 9 out of 10. The MEB NARSUM examiner documented chronic left knee pain that was medically managed.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...