Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00452
Original file (PD-2014-00452.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD - 20 14 - 00 452
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0211
Separation Date: 20060809


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Signal Support Systems Specialist) medically separated for low back pain (LBP). The LBP could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The LBP condition, characterized as “chronic LBP,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic back pain, without significant neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : “Hypertension was only considered in this review. Per my medical records I was discharged because of my back issues. I now have to pay for recurring issues regarding severe problems and request a review. My separation was due to severe back issues. A review of my medical records will show this. My injury has followed my career in the Army throughout! I asked for a transfer several times and was denied by my chain of command. I would have chosen to stay in the military and continued my service. I was deemed, unfit! Now, I have to deal with back pain, hy pertension on a daily basis!!”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.



invalid font number 31502


RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20060712
 VA - (No Show)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic LBP 5299-5237 0% Chronic LBP (Claimed as Herniated Nucleus Pulpous/Sciatic Radiculopathy/Osteoarthritis/
Degenerative Disc Disease [DDD])		 5243-5242 Not Service Connected No Show
Other x0
 Other x1
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 10%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20070924 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])

ANALYSIS SUMMARY :

 Chronic LBP Condition . The CI developed LBP in November 2004 when he fell while carrying a heavy load during Basic Training. He developed some muscle spasm and after a few days of pain, went to sick call. The lumbar spine X -ray showed mild osteoarthritis and DDD L5-S1. The CI was seen for LBP in Medical Clinic with physical exam findings of tenderness to palpation (TTP) in the bilateral paraspinal areas and decreased range - of - motion (ROM) . The physical therapist noted sharp LBP for 2 weeks, aggravated by running and push - ups. The physical exam findings were forward flexion limited to hands only reaching mid-thigh with normal motor and sensory exams. The CI was seen in sick call for LBP. A lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging was performed for LBP and numbness that radiated into both legs . The imaging showed a small to moderate size d right paracentral disc herniation at L4-5 causing mild to moderate central canal stenosis , moderate right foramina right L4 nerve root encroachment/stenosis , and advanced degenerative disc changes with broad based disc bulging L5-S1. The CI was fitted with a back brace for LBP. He was referred to a Chiropractor for back manipulations and was noted to have TTP in both the right and left paraspinal areas. A lumbar spine X -ray showed mild disc narrowing at L3-4, L4-5 and L5-S1 levels along with mild sclerosis and osteophyte formation of L4-5 consistent with mild degenerative changes. The CI was evaluated by Physical Rehabilitation Medicine which recommended epidural steroid injections. The CI showed slight improvement for a few days, but then regressed with sciatic radiculopathy. The CI had a slip and fall on 21 June 2005 and the emergency room (ER) examiner noted back pain and leg pain. A lumbar spine X -ray performed in the ER showed disc narrowing at L5-S1, mild posterior osteophytes at L5 and mild anterior osteophytes at L4. The CI underwent a medial spinal blocking in November 2005. The spinal surgeon documented that a discussion centered on different possible surgical options. The CI underwent a second medial branch block . The s pine surgeon noted that because of the multilevel involvement, surgery would not be a viable options and he recommend ed conservative treatment. The MEB narrative summary exam performed approximately 5 months prior to separation documented that the CI had chronic daily pain. The examiner also noted that the CI admitted to a number of Waddell symptoms which included positive tailbone pain, whole leg numbness, whole leg pain, and posterior give way of left leg. The MEB physical exam findings were essentially normal ROM measurements with exception of extension which was 20 degrees (30 degrees normal) for a combined of 230 degrees . He had painful motion, no TTP and normal gait, strength, sensory exams. There was no evidence of radicular signs or symptoms. The CI failed to show for his scheduled VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam on 27 June 2007 .

The Board direct ed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the c hronic LBP condition as 5299 analogous to 5237 ( l umbosacral or cervical strain ) and rated at 0%. The VA coded the c hronic LBP condition as 5243 , ( Intervertebral Disc Syndrome ) , with 5242 ( d egenerative arthritis of the spine ) and did not grant s ervice - connection due to failure to show for the C&P exam. The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease . ” The CI met the 10% rating criteria of “ combined range of motion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 120 degrees but not greater than 235 degrees . ” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the c hronic LBP condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic L ow B ack P ain 52 42 1 0%
COMBINED 1 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 140114 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record





XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review



invalid font number 31502


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150010999 (PD201400452)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




 Encl              XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                            (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01647

    Original file (PD2012 01647.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 Service FPEB – Dated 20030917VA (# Mo. The PEB used these rules to rate the chronic LBP condition, coded 5295 lumbosacral strain, and initially rated at 10% (with characteristic pain on motion). The Board notes that although they did not change the VASRD code, verbiage contained on the FPEB’s findings and recommendations document suggeststhe FPEB may have utilized VASRD code 5293, intervertebral disc syndrome (also in effect at the time of separation) to arrive at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01492

    Original file (PD-2013-01492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the 10% rating criteria – “localized tenderness not resulting in abnormal gait or abnormal spinal contour.” All exams proximate to separation documented paraspinal tenderness at the mid to lower lumbar regions and the only exam with ROM measurements documented normal thoracolumbar ROM.The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00077

    Original file (PD-2014-00077.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An epidural block performed in April 2006 was ineffective for pain relief.A lumbar spine X-ray showed localized narrowing of the disc space between L4-5 with DDD. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 4 months prior to separation documented that the CI had daily pain rated at 5/10 that increased to 8/10 pain and spasm with activity.The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings were normal forward flexion with a combined range-of-motionof 215 (240 is normal) with marked spasm,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02308

    Original file (PD-2013-02308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He rated his pain at 4/10. Deluca criteria§4.71a Rating10%* (PEB 10%)10% (VA 10%) invalid font number 31502 *IAW VASRD §4.59, Painful motion invalid font number 31502 The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.The PEB coded the chronic LBP secondary to L5-S1 HNP without neurologic deficit condition 5243 (Intervertebral Disc Syndrome) and rated at 10%. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02384

    Original file (PD-2013-02384.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Back Pain Due To Lumbar DDD/Extruded Discs Condition . Pre-SepVA C&P 16 Days Pre-SepFlexion (90 Normal)65Used ROM’s from PT exam60Combined (240)210210CommentPos. invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01713

    Original file (PD2013 01713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) status post (s/p) L5/S1 fusion” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Should the Board judge that a condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements, a disability rating IAW the VASRD, based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended. invalid font number 31502 ” The CI had chronic LBP and ROM flexion limited to 80 degrees at the MEB exam.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01741

    Original file (PD-2014-01741.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “lumbar degenerative disc disease without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA coded the lumbar spine DDD condition as 5242 and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00161

    Original file (PD2013 00161.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ratings for the unfitting neck and back conditions are addressed below. The PT note on 16March 2007, 3 months prior to separation recorded bubble inclinometer ROM without specification of the method used, or normal values, at flexion 21 degrees, and extension 9 degrees with pain.The MEB NARSUM exam on 23 April 2007, approximately2 months prior to separation, documented that the CI’s LBP symptoms had slowly worsened and that he had undergone rest, activity modification, anti-inflammatory...