Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01311
Original file (PD-2013-01311.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXX      CASE: PD-2013-01311
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150114
SEPARATION DATE: 20041220


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-4 (Food Service Specialist) medically separated for lumbar spine Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) conditions. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The lumbar spine condition, characterized as “chronic mechanical low back pain (LBP),” was forwarded to the PEB IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic mechanical low back pain, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “ In desperate need of employment; however, unable to accept anything that requires labor, standing, or lifting because of disability. Therefore, struggling to survive especially after GI Bill was out…pes planus – flat feet.” [sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040720
 VA - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain 5237 10% Degenerative Disk Disease… 5243 0% STR
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 5
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 0%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50809 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ]


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain, Without Neurologic Abnormality Condition. Available treatment records documented that the CI presented to primary care on 15 February with a 1-year history of low back and multi-joint pain. She was evaluated by physical medicine and rehabilitation and diagnosed with muscular LBP. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging studies of the low back were normal. She underwent a course of physical therapy, but continued to report persistent LBP. An orthopedic evaluation, dated 26 July 2002, noted that there was no indication for surgical intervention. The CI was deployed to Iraq, but was evacuated on 25 June 2003 due to chronic LBP. X-rays of the lumbar spine dated 8 July 2003 demonstrated fusion of the 5th lumbar vertebral body on the right and evidence of degenerative disc disease at the lumbosacral level. The CI underwent a second course of physical therapy, epidural steroid injections, and continued pain medications without relief of her chronic LBP secondary to arthritis (facet arthropathy). The narrative summary physical examination dated 25 June 2004 was significant for muscular tenderness to palpation bilaterally in lumbar region and severe pes planus. The examiner rendered a diagnosis of chronic mechanical LBP. The range-of-motion was normal except for slightly decreased thoracolumbar extension and lateral flexion bilaterally. The CI did not report for her VA Compensation and Pension examination.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB adjudicated the chronic mechanical LBP as unfitting with a disability rating of 10% coded, 5237 (lumbosacral strain). The VA rated the LBP condition at 0%, coded 5243 (degenerative disk disease). The Board considered whether there was evidence for a higher than 10% rating for the LBP condition. There was no evidence of radiculopathy. There was no evidence of muscle spasms, abnormal spinal contour, abnormal gait, or limitation of forward flexion between 60-85 degrees for a 20% disability rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic mechanical LBP, without neurologic abnormality condition. The Board concluded therefore that this condition could not be recommended for additional disability rating.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic mechanical LBP, without neurologic abnormality condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.







 The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130911, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review



































 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Rev iew Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150008227 (PD201301311)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Enc l                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00808

    Original file (PD2012 00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded chronic back pain and chronic neck pain as medically unacceptablefor Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication IAW AR 40-501.The PEB adjudicated the “chronic pain, neck and LBP, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated together as 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the “unbundled” chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously agrees it was not separately unfitting and that it cannot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02289

    Original file (PD-2013-02289.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB only referred “chronic neck pain” and “chronic low back pain” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB physical examination noted decreased range-of-motion (ROM) of the cervical areas and tenderness with spine palpation.The narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 7 April 2004 noted the CI could not perform the duties of his MOS secondary to chronic low back and neck pain.A permanent profile U3/L3dated 12 May 2004 was issued for neck pain, CTS and a chronic lower back...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01447

    Original file (PD-2013-01447.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20041206 The LBP, characterized as “chronic low back pain” and “degenerative disc disease (DDD),” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “degenerative disc disease with chronic low back pain”as unfitting, rated 10%.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01409

    Original file (PD 2012 01409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB rated the chronic mechanical LBP 10% under the VASRD code for lumbar strain in effect at the time citing characteristic pain on motion without neurologic abnormality or documented chronic paravertebral muscle spasms on repeated examinations. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF Acting Director Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01886

    Original file (PD-2013-01886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic LBP, characterized as “chronic uncomplicated low back pain (slight/intermittent),” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic subjective low back pain, without neurologic abnormality”as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of theVA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The examination noted limited painful extension and normal flexion,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02492

    Original file (PD-2013-02492.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Low Back Pain Condition . The ROM findings rated by the MEB and VA were similar, each yielding 20% ratings under the VASRD §4.71a general spine formula.The Board also notes the earliest VA spinal evaluation was 6 yearsafter the date of Service separation.IAW DoDI 6040.44 and the post-separation time reference, the service treatment record evidence was assigned exclusive probative value with respect to the Board’s recommendations. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01023

    Original file (PD 2012 01023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1201023 SEPARATION DATE: 20020814 BOARD DATE: 20130124 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (13B/Canon Crewmember), medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP) secondary to spondylolysis at L-3 without neurologic abnormality. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01911

    Original file (PD-2013-01911.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA rated under a peripheral nerve code 8520 (sciatic nerve) at 40% (moderately severe) citing pain and numbness to both extremities; in addition to lumbar disc protrusion for 10% under code 5242 (degenerative arthritis).Board members first agreed that sufficient evidence of painful motion was present to justify the rating of 10%, as well as the presence of localized tenderness not resulting in abnormal gait or spinal contour IAW §4.59 and §4.71a.Next, members acknowledged the ROM values...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01112

    Original file (PD-2013-01112.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back condition, characterized as “herniated thoracic disc” and “herniated lumbar disc” by the MEB, was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam LBP diagnosed as Herniated Thoracic and Lumbar Disc523710%Lumbar Spine Degenerative Arthritis524210%20081212Other x 7 (Not in Scope)Other x 620081212 Rating: 10%Combined: 60%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20090511(most proximate to date of separation)...