Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01886
Original file (PD-2013-01886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-01886
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141016
SEPARATION DATE: 20050207


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (25S/Satellite Communicator) medically separated for chronic subjective low back pain (LBP). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The chronic LBP, characterized as “chronic uncomplicated low back pain (slight/intermittent),” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic subjective low back pain, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “PFPS in both legs occurred during service and would have made me 30% if included in MEB. VA rated me 30% just under (4) months after discharge.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic subjective low back condition is addressed below; no additional conditions (the contended patellofemoral pain syndrome) are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20041129
 VA - (1 Mo. Pre –Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain, without Neurologic Abnormality 5299 5237 10% Degenerative Disc Disease of L5-S1 5242 10% 20050104
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 2 20050104
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 30%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 20531 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers VA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations; and, DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12-month interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.

Chronic Low Back Pain Condition. The narrative summary notes that since August 2001 (4 years prior to separation) the CI had a history of chronic LBP without radiation to the lower extremities (LE) or neurological symptoms. Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 16 July 2002 showed lower lumbar degenerative disc disease with a small disc protrusion at L5-S1 without any spinal canal stenosis or nerve impingement. Neurological evaluation performed on 19 August 2003 noted normal gait and full range-of-motion (ROM) of the back without muscle spasm and with normal strength, sensation, and reflexes of the bilateral LE. Evaluation by a spine specialist on 20 August 2003 indicated MRI in August 2003 was unchanged and flexion-extension spine X-rays did not show any dynamic instability. The examination noted limited painful extension and normal flexion, without muscle spasm or other abnormal findings.
At the MEB examination performed on 15 October 2004, approximately 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic daily back pain and stiffness, worse with activity and use of over the counter anti-inflammatory medication as needed. The MEB physical examination noted no tenderness of the spine and cited physical therapy measured thoracolumbar ROM of flexion of 75 degrees, extension to 5 degrees and combined thoracic lumbar (TL) ROM of 142 degrees, with an otherwise normal examination.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 4 January 2005, performed a month prior to separation, the CI reported constant localized back pain, with muscle spasms. The CI reported that he could function without medication for the pain; there were no periods of incapacitation and he had not lost any work time due to the back condition. The VA examination noted normal gait and posture and midline lumbar tenderness. Straight leg raise testing was reported as positive bilaterally. There was full TL ROM with pain, without muscle spasm. There were no signs of intervertebral disc syndrome (IVDS) with chronic nerve root involvement. Bilateral LE strength, sensation and reflexes were normal.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the LBP condition 10%, coded 5299-5237 (analogous to lumbar strain) and the VA also rated it 10%, coded 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine). The Board agreed that the evidence in record supported the 10% rating according to the current VASRD General Formula for rating the spine. At the MEB the CI had TL flexion of “greater than 60° but not greater than 85°” and TL combined ROM of “greater than 120° but not greater than 235°” and at the pre-separation C&P examination the CI had painful but normal ROM and no muscle spasm was present on either examination. At the C&P examination the CI did not meet the threshold for a compensable rating based upon TL ROM, but did meet a 10% rating IAW §4.59 (painful motion). The Board reviewed to see if there was any path to a higher evaluation than 10%, but there was no “muscle spasm or guarding severe enough to result in an abnormal gait or spinal contour;” no documentation of incapacitating episodes due to the back condition to rate as IVDS (5243); or, evidence of ratable peripheral nerve impairment in record that would provide for additional or higher rating of the back condition. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.59, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic LBP condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131022, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record



                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557

 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150006969 (PD201301886)
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02240

    Original file (PD-2013-02240.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Low Back and Left Leg Pain Condition. Despite additional treatment the CI continued to report primarily back pain with some numbness/tingling to the left thigh area, but was noted to have good strength, sensation and reflexes.A repeat myelogram did not indicate any further nerve compression and no further surgical intervention was recommended.At the MEB examination performed on 9 March 2005, approximately 4 months prior to separation, the CI reported chronic pain increased by activity and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02323

    Original file (PD-2013-02323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Cervical spine MRI on 20 January 2005 noted lower cervical spine disc herniation with spinal stenosis and general degenerative disc disease.As noted above, a note in the STR indicated “EMG/NCS-no evidence of radiculopathy.”Notes in the STR near the date of separation noted continued neck pain with intact ROM and normal strength and sensation.At the MEB examination on 27 May 2004, (approximately 5 months prior to separation)the CI reported neck pain. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01739

    Original file (PD-2013-01739.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the CI’s history of significant back pain with muscle spasm and radiation of pain with mild weakness and decreased sensation of the right lower leg. However, notes in the STRs proximate to separation indicated daily use of a muscle relaxant medication and later evidence in record suggests episodes of muscle spasm continued, consistent with the lumbar spine abnormalities noted on MRI.Board members consensus was that the totality of evidence in record supports the 20%...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00415

    Original file (PD 2014 00415.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Low Back Pain Condition . The Board noted that the CI does not state when the nerve block was accomplished nor specify which evaluation followed it in his contention. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02291

    Original file (PD-2013-02291.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The first record in evidence is a primary care note dated 26 April 2004 in which the CI reported LBP for a month without recorded trauma (but later recorded as after performing a “flutter kick”). At the MEB examination on 12 January 2005, 5 months prior to separation, the CI reported back pain since physical training. The primary care note on 13 July 2005, several weeks after separation, documented that the neurological examination had “no gross motor and sensory deficits.” The C&P...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00130

    Original file (PD 2014 00130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board agreed that the evidence in the record at both the MEB and C&P examinations supported the 10% rating IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) for painful limited arm motion that did not meet the threshold compensable rating of 20% for “limited motion at shoulder level.” Board practice when rating ascode 5201 has considered 90 degrees of abduction or flexion “shoulder level.” There was no evidence in record of any other ratable impairment of the shoulder or incapacitating episodesallow for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01154

    Original file (PD-2014-01154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Examination noted normal lumbar spine ROM with pain and normal bilateral hip ROM.An orthopedic evaluation on 27 March 2009, 5 months prior to separation, noted a 16-month history of pelvic pain following pregnancy. At...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02574

    Original file (PD-2013-02574.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20050508 Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Back Pain due to Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease…5299-524220%Paravertebral Muscle Spasms…5293-529240%VA PN*Right Leg Radiculopathy…5293-852010%VA PN*No Additional MEB/PEB Entries in Scope Combined: 60%Combined: 20%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20050826. Muscle strength in the bilateral lower extremity was normal and sensory examination recorded decreased pinprick sensation in the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00470

    Original file (PD 2014 00470.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain due to back injury with findings of a disc protrusion at L5/S1” as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060421VA -(3 Days Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP w/ disc protrusion at L5/S1523710%L5/S1...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01603

    Original file (PD-2013-01603.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP…5299-529510%Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbosacral Spine524220%20060315Otherx 0 (Not in Scope)Other x9 20060315 Rating: 10%Combined: 90%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060708 most proximate to the date of separation (DOS) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. DoDI 6040.44 provides for consideration of...