BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
SEPARATION DATE: 20040204
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
CASE NUMBER: PD1201330
BOARD DATE: 20130124
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an activated National Guard CPL/E-4 (88M10/Truck Driver),
medically separated for chronic low back pain (LBP). The CI sustained a back injury while
deployed to Iraq in February 2003. The chronic LBP condition could not be adequately
rehabilitated and did not improve adequately after surgery to meet the physical requirements
of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued
a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded
no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB adjudicated the
chronic back pain condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs
Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated
with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “VA rated my back at 40 percent, when I separated (sic) I was given 10%. I
have 10% for hearing loss. I was also service connected for ED. I was also told I have PTSD.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The other requested conditions, hearing
loss, erectile dysfunction (ED) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are not within the
Board’s purview. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise
outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service PEB – Dated 20031211
VA (18 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20050207
Condition
Chronic Back Pain
Code
5243
Rating
10%
Condition
S/P L3 S1 Discectomy for
Herniated Nucleus Pulposus
Code
5299-5243
Rating
40%
Exam
20050826
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
Combined: 10%
Combined: 40%
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Chronic Back Pain, Status Post L5-S1 Discectomy, without Neurologic Abnormality. The
goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in
arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are
summarized in the chart below.
Thoracolumbar ROM
(degrees)
Flexion (90 Normal)
Ext (0-30)
R Lat Flex (0-30)
L Lat Flex (0-30)
R Rotation (0-30)
L Rotation (0-30)
Combined (240)
55
15
(30) 60
(30) 60
(30) 50
(30) 50
190
30
30
30
30
30
30
180
Normal gait (see text)
40%
MEB ~3.5 Mo. Pre-Sep*
VA C&P ~18 Mo. Post-Sep*
Comment: Surgery ~7
Mo. Pre-Sep
§4.71a Rating
Pain with flexion;
radiation of pain
20% (PEB 10%)
* VASRD Spine note 2 applied. VA exam extracted from detailed VARD.
The CI underwent a discectomy in July 2003, approximately 7 months prior to separation. The
MEB physical exam in October 2003, 3 months prior to separation, described “pain with flexion
at around 40-45 degrees,” and “pain with…bending and twisting….” In the narrative summary
(NARSUM) in October 2003, the CI reported moderate pain with sitting, bending over, and
straightening his back. He reported numbness and tingling down to his lower left leg. He said
that his symptoms were unchanged by his surgery and worse after physical therapy (PT). He
had no loss of bladder or bowel control. The NARSUM physical exam noted tenderness over
the spine at L4-5. Lower extremity strength, reflexes, and light touch sensation were normal.
He had a positive straight leg test. He was able to walk toe to heel. There was no
documentation of imaging or electrodiagnostic studies. The ROM is summarized in the chart,
above. The PEB assigned a rating of 10% based on the “combined thoracolumbar rotation” (sic)
of 290 degrees and localized tenderness. The report of the VA Compensation and Pension
(C&P) exam, in August 2005, 18 months after separation, was not available for review. The VA
Rating Decision in September 2005 cited the VA exam as (summarized) “normal posture and
gait; normal curvature, symmetry, and head positioning; no muscle spasms, weakness, or
guarding; neurological examination revealed normal sensation and no motor deficits with no
atrophy and normal muscle tone; reflexes were 2 plus and equal; Lasegue’s sign (straight leg
raise) was positive bilaterally; lumbar spine forward flexion was measured as being 30
degrees….” There was insufficient evidence of any additional functional loss due to DeLuca
criteria to warrant consideration of a higher evaluation. The remainder of the ROMs are
charted above. Further remote C&P exams in evidence indicated improved forward flexion to
65 degrees on multiple exams.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
PEB rating of 5243 at 10% cited “combined thoracolumbar rotation 290 degrees. With localized
tenderness.” The VA 40% rating was based on forward flexion to 30 degrees. The Board
adjudged that the MEB evidence had the higher probative value in the Board’s deliberation due
to its proximity to separation. The remote VA exam was considered post-separation worsening.
The CI’s limitation of forward flexion to 55 degrees, as documented in the NARSUM, supported
a rating of 20% for rating code 5243 for forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater
than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees. There was insufficient evidence of any
additional functional loss due to DeLuca criteria to warrant consideration of a higher
evaluation. The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine ratings are with
or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness, or aching in the area of
the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease. There was no evidence of incapacitating
episodes, or associated objective non-pain neurologic abnormalities which would warrant other
rating considerations. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of
VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the
chronic back pain, status post L5-S1 discectomy, without neurologic abnormality condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not
surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD
were exercised. In the matter of the chronic back pain, status post L5-S1 discectomy, without
neurologic abnormality condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of
20%, coded 5243 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope
of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION
Chronic Back Pain, Status Post L5-S1 Discectomy, without
Neurologic Abnormality
VASRD CODE RATING
5243
COMBINED
20%
20%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120719, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / XXXXXXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-
3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20130003091 (PD201201330)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,
I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20%
without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided
to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have
shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this
memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00117
Physical exam showed decreased, but unmeasured, range-of-motion (ROM) of the lumbar spine.At the physical therapyexam on 19 September 2005 (2 months prior to separation), pain limited motion was noted to occur on flexion, left lateral flexion and rotation (see chart below).Increased pain from motion “quickly returned to baseline.” All measurements were repeated three times.At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam on 13 February 2006 (3 months after separation) the CI complained of...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01462
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060331VA -(> 6 Years Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Back Pain status post (S/P) L5-S1 Discectomy w/o Neurologic or Electrodiagnostic Abnormality...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00823
However both the NARSUM and the treatment record document the radicular pain and weakness continued at the same level of severity after the second surgery and at least until the time of the MEB NARSUM in April 2006. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record VASRD CODE RATING 20% 10% 30% 5243 8620 COMBINED XXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review 6 PD1100823 SFMR‐RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00411
The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit only for the Low Back Pain condition determined unfit for continued military service and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. The Board also considered the condition of Sciatica and unanimously determined that as the CI only had radiating pain and no motor or sensory deficits, no rating may be applied. ...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00496
The CI was referred to the PEB, determined unfit for the condition, and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy, Marine Corps and Department of Defense regulations. Flex0-90105 (90)6090Ext0-30NE35 (30)30R Lat flex0-30252530L lat flex0-30302530R rotation0-3060 (30)40 (30)30L rotation0-3060 (30)40 (30)30COMBINED240200-235200240Notes:DTR’s equal; All Waddells negative; no mention of neurologic examNeurologically...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01587
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD1201587 BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY BOARD DATE: 20130411 SEPARATION DATE: 20020903 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4(74B/COMPUTER SPECIALIST) medically separated for a lumbar spine condition due to lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). ...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00106
He is having radicular symptoms predominantly in the right buttock, posterior thigh, anterolateral leg and dorsal foot”.The “lower back” exam documented “flexion to approximately 60 degrees, extension to 0 degrees,” an absent ankle jerk reflex on the right, a positive right straight leg raise test (for radiating symptoms)and otherwise normal sensory and motor exams (without any mention of spasm, contour, or gait). Of note, a remote VA exam, over 5 years after separation, documented right...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02591
The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Back Pain Condition . SLR bilaterally; Normal strength,...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02342
At that point I was sent to the medical review board to see what my options were. The VA rated the right ankle and foot at 10% coded 5284 (Foot injuries, other; “moderate symptoms”) with two additional 0% ratings for 5276 (Flatfoot, acquired [pes planus] “Mild”) and 5280 (hallux valgus).The Board considered that the disability conditions of the foot had overlapping symptoms and considered a possible higher rating-level under 5284 (considering all foot/ankle conditions) or 5310 (muscle...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01808
ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The Board evaluates VA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation.DoDI 6040.44 specifies a 12-month interval for special consideration to VA findings.Post-separation evidence, however, is probative only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation from military...