RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
SEPARATION DATE: 20020713
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
CASE NUMBER: PD1200599
BOARD DATE: 20121108
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E4 (11B/Infantryman), medically separated for
chronic right groin pain. In September 2000, following a game of football, the CI developed a
right groin hernia. The CI had a prior history of successful right hernia repairs at age 4 and 12.
One month after successful right inguinal hernia repair in early 2001, the CI experienced right
groin pain causing significant physical limitations. Peripheral Neuropathy of the right ilio-
inguinal nerve was diagnosed along with scar pain. Two unsuccessful right ilio-inguinal nerve
blocks in the fall of 2001 were unsuccessful. Exploratory surgery in November 2001 with
neurolysis was also unsuccessful in reversing possible pathological nerve entrapment. The CI
did not improve adequately with treatment to meet the physical requirements of his Military
Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent
L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The condition characterized as
“chronic right groin pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically
unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB
adjudicated the “chronic right groin pain status post right inguinal hernia surgery” as unfitting,
rated 0% with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities
(VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “I still have chronic right groin pain which keeps me from being able to run for
an extended period of time without hurting for days afterwards. I hurt every day with some
days worse than others. Good days I hurt. Bad days I hurt to the point that I can barely get out
of bed.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The rating for the unfitting chronic right
groin pain condition is addressed below. Any conditions or contention not requested in this
application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future
consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service IPEB – Dated 20020415
Condition
Code
Rating
Chronic R groin pain
8799-8729
0%
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
VA (3 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020714
Condition
Inguinal Hernia Repair w/groin
pain
Code
7338
Rating
10%
Exam
20021014
0% X 0 / Not Service-Connected x 0
Combined: 0%
Combined: 10%
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Disability Evaluation System (DES) is responsible for maintaining a fit
and vital fighting force. While the DES considers all of the member's medical conditions,
compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a member’s
career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. The DES
has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity
or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation nor for conditions
determined to be service-connected by the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA) but not
determined to be unfitting by the PEB. However the DVA, operating under a different set of
laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service-connected
conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the
Veteran’s disability rating should his degree of impairment vary over time. The Board’s role is
confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB
rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on severity at the time of
separation.
Right Groin Pain Condition: The narrative summary (NARSAM) indicated no evidence of repeat
hernia during exploratory right groin surgery in November 2001. At the MEB exam, 6 months
before separation, the CI complained of “chronic intense right groin pain.” Exam noted “no
abdominal tenderness…no notable right or left inguinal hernias. The right testicle is slightly
high riding and non-tender. The musculoskeletal system reveals full range-of-motion (ROM),
specifically at the right hip. The strength in his right lower extremity is normal as is his sensory
function…” Pain was considered moderate and constant with a diagnosis of chronic right groin
pain. Profile restriction was “no repetitive motion of the lower extremities.”
The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, performed 3 months after separation, noted
the CI stated “he had pain in the right inguinal area every day and sometimes the pain radiates
down to the right thigh and right leg.” Physical exam showed good posture and gait, slight
tenderness and diminished sensation to light touch in the right groin. Computerized
Tomography (CT) imaging demonstrated a “small inguinal hernia without any intra-hernial
content. Suspicious of bilateral hydroceles…”
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
IPEB coded the condition as 8799-8729, analogous to Neuralgia (External Cutaneous Nerve of
the Thigh), rated at 0% (moderate) IAW the VASRD. The VA coded the condition as 7338
Hernia, Inguinal rated at 10%. For rating the diagnosis of a post-operative ilio-inguinal
neuropathy (8730, Ilio-inguinal nerve) and the External Cutaneous Nerve of the Thigh (8729)
code are both limited to a maximum rating of 0% for ‘moderate’ peripheral nerve impairment
IAW VASRD §4.124 for rating neuralgia “with a maximum equal to moderate incomplete
paralysis.” The Board deliberated if the CI’s hernia noted on the post-separation VA imaging
justified coding under code 7338. The VA exam was closer to the date of separation, and there
was no evidence of post-separation injury or worsening in the 3 months post-separation. The
Board determined that the VA exam had the higher probative value for rating. The CI’s
disability picture of pain and post-surgical hernia was closest to the disability picture of the
VASRD 7338 10% criteria “Postoperative recurrent, readily reducible and well supported by
truss or belt.” There was no evidence that any hernia was not reducible, irremediable or not
able to be supported as would be required to warrant the higher 30% rating. After due
deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the
Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the chronic right groin pain condition coded as
8729-7338 to indicate inclusion of the pain and post-operative recurrent hernia by diagnostic
testing.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not
surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD
were exercised. In the matter of the chronic right groin pain condition, the Board unanimously
recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 8729-7338 IAW VASRD §4.114. There were no
other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board therefore recommends that the CI’s prior determination be
modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
VASRD CODE RATING
8729-7338
COMBINED
10%
10%
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
Chronic Right Groin Pain Condition
UNFITTING CONDITION
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120604, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / ), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120021220 (PD201200599)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review
(DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.
Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s
recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization
of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected
accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and
to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00593
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20030415 NAME: CASE NUMBER: PD1200593 BOARD DATE: 20121204 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCpl/E-3 (3381/Basic Marine), medically separated for right inguinal pain, ilioinguinal neuralgia, status post repair of recurrent right inguinal hernia repair, and incidental occurrence of left...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01682
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The abdominal examination was normal except right inguinal scar tenderness. In the matter of the chronic inguinal pain condition, the Board unanimously determined that the painful surgical scar was separately...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01813
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. A surgical procedure to “untrap” the nerve was offered to the CI who declined.On a pain clinic evaluation on 27 January 2004, the CI reported groin pain shooting to his scrotum.On examinationthe surgical scars were...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00171
Further surgical treatment was not recommended.At the MEB exam performed on 14 March 2007 (performed 3 months prior to separation), the CI reported continued left groin pain with activity. Data quoted were: 1) well healed 9 x 2 cm scar in the left inguinal area, tender to palpation; 2)well healed 5x1 cm scar in right inguinal area tender to palpation and 3) no evidence of recurrent groin hernias.The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01653
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY SEPARATION DATE: 20020315 NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE NUMBER: PD1201653 BOARD DATE: 20130129 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4, (13B/Cannon Crewman), medically separated for chronic right groin pain, subsequent to inguinal hernia repair with mesh. Both the PEB and VA rated the right inguinal hernia...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00668
The MEB forwarded “chronic left groin pain” on AF Form 356 to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AFI 48-123. Left Groin Condition . RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02106
Right Inguinal Pain Condition .The treatment record reflected that the CI had a right-sided inguinal hernia repair done in 2005 with a return of painful symptoms in 2006. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01793
The Board’s authority as defined in DoDI 6044.40, however, resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. The PEB adjudicated the left groin condition at 10% coded 8730 (neuralgia; ilio-Inguinal nerve) whereas the VA dual coded (inguinal hernia-paralysis of ilio-Inguinal nerve) at 10%. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00064
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW In the matter of the right inguinal condition (neuropathy complicating hernia repair), the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 8699-8630 IAW VASRD §4.124a. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00132
ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The Board notes that the CI’s contended rating for his right groin condition references a VA rating decision based on evaluations performed over a year after separation. Right Groin Condition . The Board considered, given the actual severity and associated disability in evidence, the applicability of VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations) which would favor a rating under the 8630 neuritis code.