Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01830
Original file (PD-2012-01830.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX  CASE: PD-2012-01830
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141218
SEPARATION DATE: 20071208


SUMMARY OF CASE: The available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 ( 13B / Cannon Crewman ) medically separated for lumbar disc degeneration. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty; however, his profile indicated he could do a modified physical fitness (PT) test. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “ Lumbar spondylosis ” and “ Lumbar disc degeneration , ” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded two other conditions ( s ensorineural hearing loss and m yopia) for PEB adjudication. T he I nformal PEB adjudicated “lumbar disc degeneration with disc bulge at L4-5 and facet arthropathy at L4-5 and L4-S1” as unfitting, rated 10 % , with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) . The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated .


CI CONTENTION: “ It seemed like they were more worried about just getting me out to clear room than the actual conditions that were putting me out. My life will never be the same because of what happened to me in the military and I would like to be treated like I served. With honor!”

His complete submission is at Exhibit A.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition, along with the contended hearing loss and myopia are addressed below and no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s implied contention for the ratings determined to be not unfitting by the PEB; and, emphasizes that the disability compensation may only be offered for those conditions that cut short the member’s career. Should the Board judge that any contested condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements; a disability rating IAW the VASRD and based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended.



 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20071017
 VA - (~3 Mos. Post-Separation)*
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Lumbar Disc Degeneration 5299-5242 10% Lumbar Spondylosis … 5239 10% 2008
Hearing Loss Not Unfitting Left Ear Hearing Loss 6100 0% 2008
Right Ear Hearing Loss 6100 NSC 2008
Tinnitus 6260 10% 2008
Myopia Not Unfitting Myopia Claimed … 6079 NSC 2008
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 6 2008
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20080502 (exams 20080212 and 20080407) .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Condition. The narrative summary (NARSUM) noted that the CI was injured in a fire mission in Afghanistan in 2006. Throughout the next 2 years, he experienced low back pain that often awakened him at night, but had no documented concerns regarding decreased strength, radiating pain, abnormal sensation, or loss of bowel or bladder continence. His examinations remained stable, documenting “normal” (non-goniometric) range-of-motion (ROM) of his thoracolumbar spine, normal sensation, normal gait and strength. Imaging showed bulging and spondylosis (degeneration) of two discs in the lower back (L4-L5 and L5-S1), but no narrowing of the spinal canal or foraminae (the openings where the nerves exit from the spine). The MEB physical exam, 4 months prior to separation (performed by PT using a goniometer and referenced in the NARSUM) noted thoracolumbar flexion of 60 degrees (normal 0-90 degrees) with painful motion and muscle spasm, but with normal gait and contour.

The post-separation VA rating decision documented a thoracolumbar ROM of 80 degrees of flexion with pain on motion, but a normal gait and no findings of additional functional loss due to incoordination, fatigability, weakness, or lack of endurance following repetitive examination.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the back at 10% (coded analogous to 5242 - degenerative arthritis), citing the PT exam and ROM “limited by pain.” The PT ROM of 60 degrees forward flexion warrants a 20% rating under the general rating formula for the spine. The VA rating of 10% (coded 5239 - spondylolisthesis) was from a post-separation exam, which documented improved forward flexion to 80 degrees. There were no periods of physician prescribed bed rest noted in the record and pain (whether or not it radiates) is considered under the general spine formula. There was no associated peripheral nerve deficit noted for any separate rating. There was no abnormal gait or abnormal spine contour noted and rating in this case was predominately based on ROM measurements.

The Board considered that the probative values of the detailed PT and VA exams were significantly greater than the short treatment note ROMs, and that the PT exam had the highest value for rating at the time of separation. Given the 60 degree forward flexion, the Board adjudged that the CI met the 20% criteria for “thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees.” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the low back condition.

Contended PEB Conditions. The Board’s main charge is to assess the fairness of the PEB’s determination that sensorineural hearing loss and myopia (vision) were not unfitting. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard. The hearing and vision conditions were not profiled (H1, E1) or implicated in the commander’s statement and were not judged to fail retention standards. The VA-rated tinnitus was considered with hearing. The hearing, tinnitus and vision conditions were reviewed by the Board. There was scant performance based evidence from the record that any of these conditions significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the contended hearing (including tinnitus) and vision conditions and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the lumbar disc degeneration condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5299-5239 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the contended hearing and vision conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Lumbar Disc Degeneration 5299-5239 20%
COMBINED
 20%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120924, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
invalid font number 31502


SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150006395 (PD201201830)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02065

    Original file (PD-2014-02065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The MEB physical exam performed 7 months prior to separation noted tender posterior cervical muscles, pain limited range-of-motion (ROM) and normal strength both upper extremities. The CI’s low back pain (LBP) began...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01977

    Original file (PD-2014-01977.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “chronic neck pain” and “chronic low back pain” as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%, respectively, for a combined 10% disability, with likely reliance on AR 635-40 for rating. Disk protrusions were noted to decrease from 2005 through 2007 and the mild dilatation of the central thoracolumbar spinal canal (Syrinx) was stable.At the MEB exam, the CI reported back pain exacerbated by activity and rare left leg pain. In the matter of the back condition, the Board...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01989

    Original file (PD-2013-01989.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE :Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (96B20/Intelligence Analyst) medically separated for chronic radiating low back pain. The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain”, “spondylolisthesis L5 on S1” and “bilateral pars interarticularis defects,” wasthe only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01661

    Original file (PD-2012-01661.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The back condition, characterized as “low back pain secondary to degenerative disc disease” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. Physical Disability Board of Review I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00618

    Original file (PD2012 00618.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The low back condition, characterized as “spondylolisthesis (grade I),” “bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy (S1) and “degenerative disc disease L5-S1,”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) In accordance with (IAW)AR 40-501.The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain with injury”as unfitting rated at0%. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02041

    Original file (PD-2014-02041.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The documentation supports that approximately a year prior to separation the CI’s back pain began to worsen as evidenced by a physical therapy (PT) range-of-motion (ROM) measurement of 40 degrees flexion (normal 90) in November 2003 and a subsequent PT ROM of 17 degrees in May 2004 (6 months prior to separation). A physical therapy exam was documented 6 months prior to separation that documented poor posture with painful motion. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00709

    Original file (PD2011-00709.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The thoracolumbar spine condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as separate diagnoses for thoracic disc and lumbar disc disease, each judged to be medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. CI CONTENTION : “I was medically separated from active duty in the US Army for spinal condition, ‘Degenerative Changes and Disc Disease of the Thoracic and Lumbar Spine with Lumbar Dextroscoliosis’ which causes constant back pain which is constantly at a 7 out of 10 on pain. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00886

    Original file (PD2011-00886.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 6040.44 (4.a) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; and, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” Although the Board will review the ratings for the unfitting lumbar condition, none of the other PEB conditions were requested for consideration and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01159

    Original file (PD-2014-01159.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060206VA – (1 week Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain…523710%Discogenic Disease and Spinal Stenosis…524320%20060228Other x 0 (Not in Scope)Other x 3 Combined: 10%Combined: 40% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060321 (most proximate to date of separation (DOS)) ANALYSIS SUMMARY :The Board acknowledges the CI’s contention that a higher rating should have been granted for the unfitting medical...