Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01989
Original file (PD-2013-01989.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE : PD -20 13 - 0 1989
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army BOARD DATE: 201 4 0723
Separation Date: 20051101


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (96B20/Intelligence Analyst) medically separated for chronic radiating low back pain. The back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain”, “spondylolisthesis L5 on S1 and “bilateral pars interarticularis defects,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic radiating low back pain (LBP)….pars defect and anterolisthesis at L5/S1” as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : The CI attached a one page statement to his application which was reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations.


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below and no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20050818
VA - (1 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Radiating LBP 5239 10% Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) with Spondylolysis L5/S1 5242-5239 20% 20051201
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
Other x5
Rating: 10%
Combined: 20%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060217 (most proxi mate to date of separation ) .


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws. The Board considers DVA evidence proximate to separation in arriving at its recommendations and DoDI 6040.44 defines a 12 months interval for special consideration to post-separation evidence. Post-separation evidence is probative to the Board’s recommendations only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the disability at the time of separation.

LBP Condition . There were two goniometric range-of- motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) MEB 3 .3 Mo s . Pre-Sep VA C&P 1 . Mo. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 50 60
Combined (240) 18 5 170
Comment Diffuse tenderness to palpation & muscle spasm lower lumbar region; decreased strength right hip & left thigh; N ormal strength both ankles ; Pos. asymmetry in reflexes Normal gait; No tenderness or spasm; Normal strength; Neg. straight leg raise bilaterally; No atrophy or radicular deficit
§4.71a Rating 20% 20 %
invalid font number 31502
The CI developed atraumatic LBP in January 2004. The CI initially felt a “pinch and under physical exam ination, findings of mild discomfort, flexion to 80 degrees, minimal tenderness to palpation and spasm in the right lumbar paraspinal muscles. He was treated conservatively with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and benzodiazepine (Valium), ice and heat. A magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) was done for LBP midline pain, worse with cough or v alsalva and demonstr ated G rade I anterolisthesis of L5 on S1 due to bilateral pars interarticularis defects. The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) because of an inability to stand up straight and pain worse ning with coughing or sneezing. PT evaluated the CI and issued a cane to assist with ambulation . The CI continued with chronic LBP and a repeat MRI demonstrated an anterior subluxa tion of L5 on S1. An electromye logram (EMG) demonstrated a normal nerve conduction study of the bilateral lower extremities. A n EMG was not done as there was no complaint of radicular pain, numbness or weakness. The CI was aero-evacuat ed to a CONUS medical facility for further treatment of the chronic LBP. The neurosurgeon documented increased pain in both frequency and intensity . P hysical examination findings were flexion 70 degrees and strength 5/5 with pain exacerbated by flexing the right hip against resistance. The CI was given a permanent L3 Profile for stable G rade 1 spondylolysis and Code C limitations in running, marching, standing for long periods , with additional restrictions noted. The commander’s statement documented that the CI walked “gingerly , was in constant pain throughout the duty day and he was unable to perform his MOS duties. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 3 months prior to separation documented constant severe LBP both in the morning when he woke up that interfered with his ability to sleep at night. He reported pain with standing for prolonged periods of time and with any physical activity. He managed his pain level with narcotic medication. The MEB NARSUM physical exam ination findings are summarized in the chart above.

The orthope dic VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately a month prior to separation documented that the CI underwent an epidural s teroid injection in August 2005. However , the CI reported LBP aggravated by prolonged standing, walking, bending, stooping and lifting heavy weight. The VA C&P exam ination findings are summarized in the chart above.

The Board directs attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the LBP condition as 5239 , spondylolisthesis or segmental instability and rated at 10%. The VA applied the combination code of 5242 ( degenerative arthritis of the spine ) analogous to 5239 and rated the DDD with spondylolysis and grade one a nterolisthesis, L5/S1 condition at 20%. The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” All exams proximate to separation met the 20% rating criteria for forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine greater than 30 degrees but not greater than 60 degrees. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the chronic back pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the Chronic L ow B ack P ain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5239 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic L ow B ack P ain 5239 2 0%
COMBINED 2 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 131028 , w/atchs
Exhib
it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans
’ Affairs Treatment Record






                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review



SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150002526 (PD201301989)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02384

    Original file (PD-2013-02384.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chronic Back Pain Due To Lumbar DDD/Extruded Discs Condition . Pre-SepVA C&P 16 Days Pre-SepFlexion (90 Normal)65Used ROM’s from PT exam60Combined (240)210210CommentPos. invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00351

    Original file (PD-2014-00351.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The “General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02260

    Original file (PD-2013-02260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The examiner also noted that the CI had a normal gait, no muscle spasm and pain rating was recorded as moderate / intermittentIAW the American Medical Association.The MEB’s history and physical examinationdocumenteddecreased ROM of the lumbar spine with tenderness to palpation and decreased sensation in the right lower extremity.The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings were summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination (performed a month post separation),...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01840

    Original file (PD-2013-01840.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the low back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02598

    Original file (PD-2013-02598.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also noted was “decreased sensation over T12-L1 dermatomal areas to include genitalia.” This examiner also reported the absence of any lower extremity muscle weakness. Undeniably the CI suffered additional lower extremity pain from the nerve involvement, but this is subsumed under the general spine rating criteria, which specifically states “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates).” The lower extremity pain components in this case have no functional implications. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01816

    Original file (PD-2013-01816.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander’s statement noted that the CI’s back condition precluded him from performing critical field tasks, his condition further interfered with his MOS duties and adversely affected his unit’s readiness.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 monthsprior to separation documented that the CI was seen in the ER on 3 October 2003 and given intravenous morphine for acute LBP and that he still had occasional moderate LBP. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00218

    Original file (PD 2013 00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was referred to physical therapy (PT) for S1 radiculopathy with physical exam findings of antalgic gait, L5-S1 pain, and positive straight leg raise on the right. By precedent, the Board threshold for a “moderate” peripheral nerve rating requires some functionally significant motor and/or sensory impairment.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01431

    Original file (PD-2013-01431.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 Service IPEB – Dated 20040225VA* - Based on Service Treatment Records (STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Subjective Back Pain with L4-5 Spondylolisthesis523910%Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD) and Spondylolisthesis5239-523540%STRChronic Arthritis Right Knee5003---%Arthritis, Right Knee5010-525910%STROther x0 (Not in Scope)Other x0 (Not in Scope) Combined: 10%Combined: 50%*Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01713

    Original file (PD2013 01713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) status post (s/p) L5/S1 fusion” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Should the Board judge that a condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements, a disability rating IAW the VASRD, based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended. invalid font number 31502 ” The CI had chronic LBP and ROM flexion limited to 80 degrees at the MEB exam.