Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00904
Original file (PD-2012-00904.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW 

SEPARATION DATE:  20030728 

 
NAME:  XXXXXXXXXXX                                                                          BRANCH OF SERVICE:   ARMY 
CASE NUMBER:  PD1200904 
BOARD DATE:  20121219    
 
 
SUMMARY  OF  CASE:    Data  extracted  from  the  available  evidence  of  record  reflects  that  the 
covered individual (CI) was an Army National Guard PFC/E‐3 (63W0/Wheel Vehicle Mechanic), 
medically separated for “rhabdomyositis post episode of rhabdomyolysis, with chronic back and 
chest  pain,  without  limitation  of  motion.”    During  the  first  week  of  basic  training,  the  CI 
collapsed in his bay after completing physical training and was hospitalized.  Inpatient testing 
revealed  an  assessment  of  rhabdomyolysis.    The  CI  was  issued  a  permanent  P3  profile  and 
referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).  In accordance with AR 40‐501, chapter 3‐46b, 
the MEB found the CI’s condition medically unacceptable for service in the US Army.  He was 
then referred to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).  In its referral, the MEB annotated back and 
chest pain, secondary to the CI’s rhabdomyositis, for the PEB’s consideration.  The PEB found 
the  CI’s  condition  unfitting  for  his  “rhabdomyositis  post  episode  of  rhabdomyolysis,  with 
chronic back and chest pain, without limitation of motion.”  The PEB rated the CI’s condition at 
0%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).  The CI 
made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 0% disability rating.   
 
 
CI  CONTENTION:    The  application  simply  states,  with  no  elaboration:  (sic)  “Because  I  have 
reoccurring problems and symptoms with the condition that affect my job and home life.  Most 
employers won’t hire me because of this.  That affects my family and living expenses.” 
 
 
SCOPE OF REVIEW:  The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 
6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined 
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; and, when requested by 
the  CI,  those  condition(s)  “identified  but  not  determined  to  be  unfitting  by  the  PEB.”  
Accordingly,  the  rating  for  the  single  specified  unfitting  condition  of  rhabdomyositis  is 
addressed below.  Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise 
outside  the  Board’s  defined  scope  of  review,  remain  eligible  for  future  consideration  by  the 
Army Board for Correction of Military Records.   
 
 
RATING COMPARISON:   
 

Service PEB – Dated 20030529  

Code 

Rating

Condition

VA  All Effective Date 20030729  

Code 

Rating 

Exam

Condition 

Rhabdomyositis Post 
Episode of 
Rhabdomyolysis, with 
Chronic Back and Chest 
Pain, Without Limitation 
Of Motion 

Combined:  0% 

 
 
 
 
 

5099‐5021 

0% 

Rhabdomyositis 

5099‐5025 

0% 

STR 

Combined:  0% 

 
 

ANALYSIS SUMMARY.   
 
Rhabdomyositis Condition.  During the first week of basic training the CI was admitted for “a 
two day history of fatigue, dizziness, muscle aching particularly the chest and upper extremities 
along  with  cramps  in  his  lower  extremities.”    He  was  found  to  have  an  elevated  creatinine 
kinase  level  over  12,000  and  was  diagnosed  with  rhabdomyolysis.    He  was  treated  and 
discharged.    Seven  months  after  the  rhabdomyolysis  episode,  he  continued  to  complain  of 
chest and lower back pain worse with motion.  He was diagnosed with rhabdomyositis.  At the 
MEB exam performed 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported continued back and chest 
pain with generalized headaches.  The MEB physical exam noted that the CI was “standing and 
walking without difficulty but showing signs of pain while standing from a sitting position.”  The 
exam  was  significant  for  tenderness  to  palpation  at  the  lower  back  and  sacral  area  with  full 
forward flexion, lateral flexion, and rotation.  There were no abnormal cardiac or pulmonary 
findings.  The MEB radiographic evaluations were normal.  There was no VA exam.   
 
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.  The 
PEB  coded  rhabdomyositis  post‐rhabdomyolsis  as  5099‐5021,  analogous  to  myositis  at  0%.  
Myositis,  is  rated  per  the  5003  rating  criteria  which  allows  for  compensation  of  pain  limited 
range‐of‐motion  (ROM)  that  does  not  reach  a  compensable  level  under  other  limitation  of 
motion  VASRD  codes.    The  VA  coded  rhabdomyositis  as  5099‐5025  at  0%,  analogous  to 
fibromyalgia for widespread musculoskeletal pain, not requiring constant medication based on 
the service treatment records.  The Board deliberated if the examiner’s statement of showing 
signs of pain when moving from a sitting to standing position indicated adequate evidence of 
painful motion IAW VASRD §4.59 (painful motion).  After due deliberation, considering all of the 
evidence  and  mindful  of  VASRD  §4.3  (reasonable  doubt),  the  Board  recommends  a  disability 
rating  of  10%  for  the  rhabdomyolysis,  with  chronic  back  and  chest  pain  condition,  rated 
analogously to 5099‐5021, myositis, for painful motion.   
 
 
BOARD FINDINGS:  IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or 
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were 
inconsistent  with  the  VASRD  in  effect  at  the  time  of  the  adjudication.    The  Board  did  not 
surmise  from  the  record  or  PEB  ruling  in  this  case  that  any  prerogatives  outside  the  VASRD 
were  exercised.    In  the  matter  of  the  rhabdomyositis  post  episode  of  rhabdomyolysis,  with 
chronic back and chest pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating 
of  10%,  coded  5099‐5021  IAW  VASRD  §4.71a.    There  were  no  other  conditions  within  the 
Board’s scope of review for consideration.   
 
 
RECOMMENDATION:  The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as 
follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.   
 

VASRD CODE  RATING
10% 
5099‐5021 
COMBINED 
10%

UNFITTING CONDITION

Rhabdomyositis post episode of rhabdomyolysis, with chronic back 
and chest pain, without limitation of motion

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

   2                                                          PD1200904 
 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 
 
Exhibit A.  DD Form 294, dated 20120608, w/atchs 
Exhibit B.  Service Treatment Record 
Exhibit C.  Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
SFMR‐RB 
 

 
 

 

 

 

           XXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF 
           President 
           Physical Disability Board of Review 

 
 

 

MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency  

(TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA  22202‐3557 

SUBJECT:  Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation  

for XXXXXXXXXX, AR20130000112 (PD201200904) 

1.  I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review 
(DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual.  

Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,   I accept the Board’s 

recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10%  without recharacterization 

of the individual’s separation.  This decision is final.   

2.  I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected 

accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.    

3.  I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the 
individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and 

to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures. 

 BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY: 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 

 

Encl 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     XXXXXXXXXXX 

     Deputy Assistant Secretary 
         (Army Review Boards) 

 

 

 
CF:  

(  ) DoD PDBR 

(  ) DVA 

 

   3                                                          PD1200904 
 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01332

    Original file (PD2012 01332.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The 7900 code used by the PEB and 5025 rating code by the VA reflects the fact that there is no code specific for rhabdomyolysis.The VA used the service treatment records (STRs) and rated the condition at 10% based on the use of pain medication for control. A 10% rating under the 7900 and 5025 codes requires continuous use of medication for control of the condition. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00108

    Original file (PD-2014-00108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    These were not documented by the PEB or MEB and are therefore not within the purview of the Board.In addition, the Board determined that the preponderance of evidence does not support the VA determination that the restrictive lung disease conditionwas a residual condition resulting from the unfitting rhabdomyolysis condition. It was determined that he was non-deployable and an MEB indicated. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00799

    Original file (PD 2012 00799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200799 SEPARATION DATE: 20011114 BOARD DATE: 20130305 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty, E1/PVT, Initial Entry Trainee, medically separated for exertional rhabdomyolysis with myoglobinuria with renal failure and coagulopathy. The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01978

    Original file (PD2012 01978.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions, characterized as “bilateral retropatellar pain syndrome with subjective ankle pain,” “neck pain,” and“acute chronic low back pain” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The informal PEBadjudicated the “neck, low back, bilateral knee and ankle pain with subjective symptoms only, x-rays and exam essentially normal, rated (and diagnosed) as myofascial pain syndrome” conditionas unfitting, with likely...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00034

    Original file (PD-2014-00034.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At a VA clinic examination on 12 October 2007, 4 months after separation, there was no weakness, muscle atrophy, with normal gait but persistent muscle pain.At the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00095

    Original file (PD 2013 00095.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Despite the CI’s remarks of pain during portions of flexion of both knees, the VA C&P noted that examination of his knee on 10 June 2003 “ was grossly unremarkable” the examiner of on to state that the knee examination revealed “ no soft tissue swelling, no point tenderness, or joint effusion and there was no ligamentous instability appreciated.” After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded there was insufficient cause to recommend a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01293

    Original file (PD2010-01293.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the matter of the neck pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, IAW VASRD §4.71a. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: Right Shoulder Pain, due to Myofascial Pain Syndrome5099-502110%Right Neck Pain, due to Myofascial Pain Syndrome5290-502110% COMBINED20% The following documentary evidence was considered:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00523

    Original file (PD2012-00523.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    All evidence to two Heat Strokes is in Military Medical Records. Even though I suffered two (2) Heat Strokes and was told I was being discharged for it, I do not receive any rating what so ever for it. Recurrent Heat Stroke with Rhabdomyolysis Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01524

    Original file (PD-2013-01524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The right knee pain and bilateral thigh weakness conditions, characterized as “Patellofemoral joint syndrome right knee” and “patella tendonitis,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00355

    Original file (PD2011-00355.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI experienced right knee pain with running and was periodically issued physical profiles from May 2001 to May 2002. The C&P examination 14 months after separation recorded complaint of right knee pain with walking and stairs. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES.