Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00576
Original file (PD2010-00576.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: Marine corps

CASE NUMBER: PD1000576 SEPARATION DATE: 20020715

BOARD DATE: 20111026

______________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Pvt (0151/Administrative Clerk) medically separated for schizophrenia paranoid type, characterized by auditory hallucinations delusions disruption at work and in interpersonal relationships. He was unable to perform within his military occupational specialty (MOS), was placed on limited duty and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The schizophrenia, characterized by hallucinations, delusions, and disruption at work and in interpersonal relationships condition was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The PEB adjudicated schizophrenia as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of SECNAVINST 1850.4E, DoDI 1332.39 and Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), respectively. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% combined disability rating.

_____________________________________________________________________________

CI CONTENTION: He elaborates no specific contentions regarding rating or coding and mentions no additionally contended conditions.

______________________________________________________________________________

RATING COMPARISON:

* The VA increased rating to 70% and granted individual unemployability effective 20050720.

Service IPEB – Dated 20020516 VA (1 Mo. Pre Separation) – All Effective Date 20020716
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Schizophrenia 9204 10% Schizophrenia 9204 50%* 20020606
↓No Additional MEB Entries.↓ 0% X 0 / Not Service Connected X 0
Final Combined: 10% Total Combined: 50%

____________________________________________________________________________

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Schizophrenia. In December 2000, the CI thought that he was the “Messiah/the second coming,” claiming to be the Son of God and a prophet. Other symptoms included ongoing auditory hallucinations, talking to himself, ability to read other people’s minds and belligerent behavior resulting in insubordination charges. The CI did not meet criteria for forced hospitalization and due to his illness refused hospitalization and medication. His symptoms caused estrangement from family, friends, and co-workers. He remained unable to perform within his MOS. He was placed on limited duty and underwent a MEB.

The narrative summary (NARSUM) on 12 March 2002 (four months pre-separation) noted the delusions and auditory hallucinations. The CI underwent three psychiatric evaluations. His diagnosis was schizophrenia, paranoid, characterized by hallucinations, delusions, and disruption at work and in interpersonal relationships. The global assessment of functioning (GAF) was 50. The condition did not exist prior to enlistment.

The patient was telling coworkers he was the second coming of Christ. He said that he hears the voice of God, being in constant communication with God and that God told him what to-do, what was going to happen, and specific details about people, situations, and how the patient could help specific people. He stated that he could read people's thoughts. In addition, he was questioning whether the standard rank structure of the Marine Corps applied to him. He was pending charges for insubordination. The CI had difficulties at work and with military authority. He was belligerent and had his rank reduced twice. He patient stated that he was hearing the voice of God on a daily basis and told him what to do and was to be in the future and that he is the Messiah. He indicated that his secret ambition in life was to rule the world again. The patient did not experience these symptoms to be out of the ordinary and reported no distress; rather he saw them as blessing and enlightenment. The PEB on 16 May 2002 (two months pre-separation) found schizophrenia unfitting, code 9204 (schizophrenia) with a 10% rating.

The VA compensation and pension (C&P) examination on 6 June 2002 (one month pre-separation) noted that he became symptomatic while on active duty and seemed to be hyperspiritual, was hearing voices, and was talking to God. He seemed to be having profound religious experiences and felt that he could predict the future. He was not anxious or depressed. He thought that his phone was being tapped and thought he might be under observation. His memory was intact for both recent and distant events. He was unable to abstract proverbs. The Axis I diagnosis was schizophrenia, paranoid type, in partial remission, with a GAF of 65. The VA rating decision on 9 August 2002 (two months post-separation) service connected schizophrenia, code 9204, with a 50% rating.

The Board noted that the records document disruption in work and interpersonal relationships with impaired abstract thinking. The CI was psychotic with significant occupational and social impairment, with no recognition that he was mentally ill due to the thought disorder and delusions totally impairing his reality testing. The CI was not violent or incompetent and could not be forced to undergo hospitalization or be forced to take medication. The fact that the CI refused medication appears to be a result of the impaired reality testing and was, therefore, not held against the CI in determining an appropriate rating. As a result of his impairment, the Board considered ratings of 30% to 100%. He did have occupational and social impairment manifested by gross impairment in thought processes and communication, persistent delusions and hallucinations, and grossly inappropriate behavior. It was also noted that when he was medicated to suppress his hallucinations and delusions, he was unable to function due to medication side effects, including extreme sedation. While the CI could show up to work, he was unable to work effectively. His ability to function at some level was a key element in the discussion related to total impairment at 100% versus a lower rating. The Board unanimously agreed that the 10% rating assigned by the PEB was exceeded. After due deliberation, considering the totality of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board, by simple majority, recommends a rating of 30%, code 9204 for schizophrenia.

______________________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the schizophrenia condition the Board, by simple majority, recommends a rating of 30% coded 9204. The single voter for dissent (who recommended a 100% rating, code 9204) did not elect to submit a minority opinion. The Board unanimously agrees that there were no other conditions eligible for Board consideration which could be recommended as additionally unfitting for rating at separation.

______________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Schizophrenia 9402 30%
COMBINED 30%

______________________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, w/atchs. (Not Dated)

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

President

Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44

(b) PDBR ltr dtd 8 Nov 11 ICO XXXXXXXX

(c) PDBR ltr dtd 10 Nov 11 ICO XXXXXXXXXX

(d) PDBR ltr dtd 10 Nov 11 ICO XXXXXXXXXXXXX

1. Pursuant to reference (a) I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (d).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

a. XXXXXXXXX1716: Separation from the Naval Service due to physical disability rated at 20 percent (increased from 10 percent) effective 28 February 2003.

b. XXXXXXXXXX3144: Correction of records to reflect placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List at 40 percent (increased from 30 percent) with no change to final separation from the Naval Service due to physical disability rated at 10 percent.

c. XXXXXXXXXXX6878: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List at 30 percent effective date of discharge (15 July 2002).

3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement these decisions and the subject members are notified once those actions are completed.

Assistant General Counsel

(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00723

    Original file (PD2009-00723.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Medical Board recommends that this member's case be referred to the Central Physical Evaluation Board.” There was a final military treatment note on 25 May 2007, one week before separation, noting that the CI felt better than any time in the last year, with no hallucinations or other signs of psychosis. The Board additionally noted that the diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was made prior to military discharge, and that the NARSUM psychiatric examiner stated, “The patient is unfit...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01074

    Original file (PD2012 01074.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was given several “rule out” diagnoses (delusional disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and paranoid personality disorder/traits) at the start of her treatment.The CI was followed by an outpatient psychiatrist whodocumented “hx of paranoid personality”on a progress note dated 07 May 2002.The CI was hospitalized following this visit which recommended that the CI be evaluated by a psychologist and considered for “repeat MEB.”(It was noted that the provider’s progress notes that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01973

    Original file (PD2012 01973.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB’s DA Form 199 cited “symptoms are controlled by continuous medication” as a 10% criterion of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD); and “rated as mild social and industrial impairment” referencing AR 635-40 (derived in turn from Department of Defense Instruction [DoDI] 1332.39).The GERD condition was determined to be not unfitting by the IPEB, but not specifically adjudicated by the FPEB (assumed to be an erroneous omission and a de facto adjudication as not...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00582

    Original file (PD2012 00582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was removed from TDRL, and medically separated with a 10% Service disability rating. At that time, he was working 35 hours per week, and was enrolled in college. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | pd2011-00255

    Original file (pd2011-00255.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY CASE NUMBER: PD1100255 SEPARATION DATE: 20030321 BOARD DATE: 20120130 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty FC3/E-4 (1119, Aegis Radar System Technician), medically separated for major depression, recurrent with psychotic features. As discussed above, any impairment due to this condition was considered in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01767

    Original file (PD-2013-01767.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A mental status exam (MSE) reported a depressed mood and affect. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the bipolar disorder condition,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01572

    Original file (PD2012 01572.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The examiner further opined that the CI had severe military and civilian impairment and that without therapy or medication, the probability for his continued mental deterioration was “extremely high” and that even with ongoing treatment theprognosis was “still guarded.” He also stated the CI’s mental illness was severe, chronic, and unfitting and he highly recommended the CI initiate psychotherapy and medication at the VA.The C&P examination approximately 4 monthsafter permanent separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009003

    Original file (20120009003.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The military physician determined he was medically unfit according to Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) and recommended entering him into the physical disability evaluation system (PDES). He was rated under the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) codes 9299 and 9210 and granted a zero-percent (0%) disability rating. Here, the PEB did so and rated his condition 0% disabling.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-02424

    Original file (BC-2001-02424.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted that the applicant was diagnosed with adjustment and personality disorders, but a determination was made by the evaluator that she did not have a psychiatric disorder that warranted disposition by a medical evaluation board, and that her personality disorder did not significantly impair her ability to adapt to military service. In view of the fact that the applicant’s symptoms were very mild at the time of her mental health evaluation, and the presence of a pre-morbid...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00415

    Original file (PD2010-00415.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The medical bases for separation were posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) associated with panic disorder and social phobia, both designated as EPTS (existed prior to service) and alcohol abuse. However, clear evidence within the VA clinic notes and the 15-month examination that covered the CI’s condition within the six-month TDRL timeframe had to be considered. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.