Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00047
Original file (FD-2015-00047.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DlSCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARIN G RECORD
NAM£ OF S£RV I MEMBER (LAST, FrRST MIDDLE INITIAL)        GRADE
(b)(6)
TVPE HON        I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVJEW
CQUN5l:I..       NAME OF COUNSEL ANO OR ORCANl7.. TION    ADORESS ANO OR ORCAll'IZATION OF COUNSEL
y        No
x








>--


>--


>--


>--
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING  HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b)(6)   X*#

X*#

X*# X*#
X*#

ISSUE!S  A94.53   IND£X NUMBER      A07.00   EXHIBITS SUBMIITED TO THE BOARD  '
I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHA RGE
LEITER OF NQTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FrLE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO TI IE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXJ-HBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APP EARANCE HEARTNG

HL\RJNC DATE      CASE NUMBER

09 Jul 2015      FD-2015-00047
APPUCA!>'T'S ISSUE AND TI-!£ 80AIU)'S DECISIONAi. RATIONAU' AR,E DISCUSSED ON THE A1TACHED AIR FORCE !JISGIARGE R,EVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.





* CHANGE RE CODE
# CHANGE REASO   AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY
(b)(6)


INDORSEMENT      DATt: 81612015
TO:      · t'ROM:

SAF/MRBR
550 CSTREETWEST,SUITE 40 RANDOLPH Af B, TX 78150-4742

SECR[TARY OFTHE AIR FORCE PERSONNEi,. COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1135 COMMAND OR. EE WING,JRO FLOOR ANDREWS AFB. MD20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00     (EF-V2Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2015-00047
GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING : The Board denies the change of reason and authority for discharge and change of reenlistment code.

ISSUE: The applicant received an Honorable discharge -Non-Retention on Active Duty

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant 's record of service included one Article 15 for conspiring to commit an offense to destroy by shooting a cow, property of a civilian with a value of more than $100, driving several airman to find the animal, help load in the truck after it was shot, drove back to camp site, consumed part of the cow, took home additional packages of meat and helped bum the remains.

The applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does submit that he believes he has grown from his mistake and would like to join the Oklahoma ANG. Applicant submitted several character letters to support his request into the guard and his performance while serving on active duty. Applicant also made mention of the DOS rollback program of FY13 and he was told by leadership that he would not be affected. DOS rollback is one of several voluntary and non-voluntary programs implemented during FY13 to help bring overall force numbers to congressionally mandated levels. Individuals that had certain indicating factors such as Article 15's would require the commander to accomplish an AF 418 (Selective Reenlistment consideration) to change member's reenlistment code to recommend for reenlistment , which would prevent them from being affected by the DOS rollback. The Board noted that from the documentation provided it did not appear that the commander had originally planned on discharging the member, but had instead gave administrative actions, as a means for rehabilitation. However, based on the seriousness of the misconduct and the commander 's understanding of the DOS rollback policies at the time, the Board majority agreed that the reason for discharge was appropriate and the reenlistment code should not be changed.

CONCLUSION : The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis to change the reason and authority for the discharge or the reenlistment code and determines it should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00607

    Original file (FD-2014-00607.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforachangetothereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode. Theapplicantwasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached briefcontainsavailablepe1tinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00156

    Original file (FD-2015-00156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeforanupgradeHonorable,achangetothenarrativereason andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereview becompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge,changeofreasonandauthority fordischargeandchangeofreenlistmentcode. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00323

    Original file (FD-2014-00323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebefore theDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-Drug AbuseTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00445

    Original file (FD-2014-00445.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERA L: Theapplicant appealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeand tochange thereenlistmentcode. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearance beforetheDischarge Review Board(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe available servicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains available pertinentdata on theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00592

    Original file (FD-2014-00592.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeof the discharge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -ConductPrejudicialtoGoodOrderandDiscipline.TheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00019

    Original file (FD-2015-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable;achangetothenarrativereasonandachangetothereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors lead ingto the discharge. FINDJNG: TheBoarddenies theupgradeof the discharge;reasonandauthorityfor discharge andchangeofreenlistmentcode. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00459_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00459_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereason andauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:Upgradeofthedischarge,changeofreasonandauthorityfordischarge,andchangeofreenlistmentcodearedenied.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00533

    Original file (FD-2014-00533.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon the availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00785

    Original file (FD-2014-00785.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservice record.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGenerald ischargefor Misconduct-MinorDisciplina ryInfractionsThe AirForceDischargeReview...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463

    Original file (BC 2013 03463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...