Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00459_13
Original file (FD-2013-00459_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRST MIDDLE JNITIAL)

G RAD E


ONAL APPEARANCE
x        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS ANO OR ORGAN17.A TION OF COUNS EL




MEMBER SITTING  HON      G EN      UOTHC    OTHER

DENY
x+ x+ x+ x+
x+



A93.0l
A67.30 A66.00

1       
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2       
APPLI C ATION F OR REVIEW OF DISCHAR GE
3 LETTER OF NO TIF IC A TI ON
4 BRIEF OF P E RSO N NEL FILE C O UN S E L ' S RE L EA S E TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITT E D AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PE RS O N AL APPEARANC E HEARING


HJ:AIUNG DA TE    CASE NUMBER

OS Sep 20 1 3      FD-20 1 3 -004 5 9

Case heard in Washington, D . C.

Advi s e applicant o f the deci s ion of the Board , the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Nam e s and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's requ e s t.

+ Narrative Reason
*Reenlistment Code


'


. - - -- · - - · -- ·. -       -- - --- - - - ·-- - . . . - . .

· - - - - --- ,-   - - - -    - --      . . ,. . _ - . -- .


' •       :;       > , ff" , . y " l , •   r - •   •        J        , , ..        ;        , .,.   •        ' ', ,,.        •        •        '        '        '

TO:

S AF/MRBR
550 C S TREET WEST, S U ITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 7 81 5 0-4 7 4 2
FROM :

SECRETARY OF THE AIR fORCE PERSONN E L COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISOIARGE REVIEW BOARD
1 Sl5 C O MMAND D R . E E WIN G , 3 RD FLOOR
ANDREWS Afll, MD 2m6l-7tol


AFHQ FORM.0-2077,JAN 00  (EF-V2)  Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00459
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The record indicates that the applicant was discharged for Misconduct-Drug Abuse and Commission of a Serious Offense: Other serious Offenses. The applicant wants his discharge upgraded to be able to receive GI Bill benefits. The record indicates the applicant was found guilty at a Special Court Martial for the following offenses: absent from duty, with intent to deceive made a false official statement to a Senior Non-Commissioned Officer, and wrongfully using marijuana. According to AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.54, Misconduct: Drug Abuse, drug use is incompatible with military service and Airman who abuse drugs one or more times are subject to discharge. Drug abuse for the purpose of this regulation is the illegal, wrongful, or improper use, possession, sale, transfer, or introduction onto a military installation of any drug. This includes improper use of prescription medication. The term drug includes any controlled substance in schedules I, II, III, IV, and V of Title 21 U.S.C., Section 812. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his three years and two months of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board found the negative aspects of the willful misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of the applicant's performance and concluded that the discharge was appropriate.

Although not specifically stated, applicant contends that he should not be penalized indefinitely for mistakes he made when he was young. The DRB recognized the applicant was 24 years of age when the discharge took place. However, there is no evidence he was immature or did not know right from wrong. The Board opined the applicant was older than the vast majority of first-term members who properly adhere to the Air Force's standards of conduct. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant's discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.

The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on March 6, 2006) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for

upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.




Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00478_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00478_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDGRADEAFSNfSSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSAHi>ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELISSUESA93.01INDEXNUMBERA67.10HON GEN UOTHC OTHERA93.07 A66.00 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'S RELEASETOTHEBOARDADDmONALEXHIBITSSUBMilTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGllt:ARJNGDATE CASENUMBEROSSep2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00580_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00580_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00429_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00429_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.TheBoardfindsthatneithertheevidenceofrecordnorthatprovidedbytheapplicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00579

    Original file (FD-2013-00579.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADEX RECORDREVI x JEFFREY T.HAWKINSADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONO•COUNSEL1780013THSTSTE108BEALECA93437 GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xA66.00 A92.21 IORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEW OFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETO11IEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBERIOJan2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00581

    Original file (FD-2013-00581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINql.AL). GRADEPERSONAL APPEARANCEx RECORDREVIEW ADORE$ ANDORORCANIZATIONOFCOUNS&L MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHERDENYISSUESA92.35INDEXNUMBER A66.00 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOfDISCHARGE3 LETIEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINCDATE CAS£NUM8ER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00550_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00550_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MEMBEISSUES A94.53...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00064

    Original file (FD-2014-00064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Thefollowingadditionalmatterswassubmittedatthehearing:ADCMemorandum,datedJuly17,2013Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00365

    Original file (FD-2014-00365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00524_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00524_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.The Board findsthat neither the evidence ofrecord nor that provided by the applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00600

    Original file (FD-2014-00600.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischarge toHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuseTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underitsresponsibility...