Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00649
Original file (FD-2014-00649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARil G RECORD
NAM E OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FI R T MIOOLE INITIAL)   GRA flE
(b) (6)

TYPE HON        I        PERSONAL APPEARANC E    x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL  NAME Of COUNSEL AllD OR ORGA. IZATIO:-'  ADDRESS AND ORORGANJ7 \TION OF COUNSEL
YtS      No       (b) (6(b) (6)
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SlTTING  HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  x
x x
x x
ISSJJ•'.S         A94.05   ll>f.X NllMBf.R  A62.00   EXITTBITS SUBMlTIED TO TlfE BOAR D
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LEITER OF NOTIFICATION
BRLEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIB ITS SUBM ITIED ATTIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE I !EARING

llEARJNG DATE    CASENUM8ER

16 Apr 2015      FD-2014-00649
APPLICANT'S ISSUE AND THI!BOARD'S 06CISIO'IAL l\ATIONAU! ARB DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIO'IALE.

Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.







.
(b) (6)


INOORSEMENT      DATE : 4/2312015
TO:      1-KO:-t :
SAF/MRBR         SECRETARYOFTllEA IR FORCE PE;RSONNtL COl!:-ICIL
AIR FORCE UISUlARG!: REVl W BOARD

550 C STREET WEST. SUITE 40
153l CO\l IANO DR, EE WING.JRO l't,OOR

RAJ DOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742     ANDREWS AFB. Ml) 2•762-700 1


AFRQ FORM 0-2077, .JAN 00        (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00649

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to change the reason and authority for the discharge.

The applicant was offered a persona l appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the change of reason and authority for discharge.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a Honorable discharge for Fraudulent Enlistment

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant' s discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included one Letter of Reprimand for failure to pass his fitness assessment.

Applicant contends that he was not aware of a pre-existing condition because he was not having headaches prior to his enlistment. The record indicates the applicant received an Honorable discharge for fraudulent enlistment for failure to disclose his headaches at his MPS physical. Upon review of the record, the Board found documentation in the medical records that the applicant suffered a head injury prior to his enlistment and informed the doctor he had been having headaches as a result. The Board finds the reason for discharge was appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.



Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00649

    Original file (FD-2013-00649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge to Honorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractions ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2011-00212

    Original file (FD-2011-00212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,viavideo teleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMarylandandTravisAFB Californiaon22 Sep2014. The followingadditionalexhibits weresubmittedat thehearing:

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00023

    Original file (FD-2014-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    S • BR550CSTREETWEST,SUITE40RANDOLPHAFB,TX781504742SECRETARYOfTHEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCILAIRFORCEDlSCHARCERCVIEW80ARI)1535COMMANDOR,£EWINC,JROFLOORANDREWSAFB,MD!07'1-7001AFHQFORM0-2077,JAN00 (EF-V2) Previous AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDDECISIONALRATIONALE CASENUMBER FD-2014-00023GENERAL: The applicant appeals forupgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00466

    Original file (FD-2014-00466.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethe reenlistmentcode. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,at AndrewsAFBonDecember18,2014. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00599

    Original file (FD-2013-00599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at AndrewsAFBon04 Apr2014.Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmittedat thehearing: Exhibit#5:CharacterreferenceletterTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00445

    Original file (FD-2014-00445.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERA L: Theapplicant appealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeand tochange thereenlistmentcode. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearance beforetheDischarge Review Board(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe available servicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains available pertinentdata on theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00338_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00338_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEAFSN/SSANADDRESS ANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOVNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHERxxA67.90 A93.07 lORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPFARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGl:f.EARJNGDATE CASENVMBER19Juf2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00673

    Original file (FD-2014-00673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeto Honorable,achange toreasonand authority forthe discharge, andachangetothereenlistmentcode. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withcounsel,viavideo teleconference between Andrews AFBMaryland, andRandolphAFBTexas,on20November2014. Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmitted atthehearing: Exhibit5:Applicant'sContentionsTheattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00211

    Original file (FD-2014-00211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDT,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEW AFSN/SSANADDRESSANOOR ORGANIZATION OFCOUNSELGEN UOTHC OTHER1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEWOF DISCHARGELEITEROF NOTIACATIONBRIEF OF PERSONNELALECOUNSEL'SRELEASETO TifE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTED ATTIMEOF PERSONAL APPEARANCETAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASE NUMBER 04Sep 2014 FD-2014-00211 r 1-;\-"'::::'",•::-:" • t - t 1 \fi ,''• (:' -.,.,.- ,f ·r-;,i\j"°",1'· ,- --•I...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00330

    Original file (FD-2013-00330.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata ontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingto thedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestherequesttochangethereasonandauthorityfordischarge. ISSUE:...