Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00673
Original file (FD-2014-00673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST,TIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)        GRADE    AFSNISSAN
FOIA Exception (b)       RllA Ex"'lllioo (b)(6)
(6)
TYPE GEN         x        I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     I        RECORD REVIEW
llMlo   
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR 0RCAN17.ATI ON    ADDRESS AND OR ORCANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES      No
x


MEMBER SITTING
'        ·"·-·"1 1 ()F lllE  ····

- t
.it••      # '








....
FOIA Exception (b) (6)
HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY

X+       #

X+       #

X+       #

X+       #


X+       #
ISSUES   INDEX NUMD£R      " ..,.,  gsrrs1u1         l'U!D'TOTJll;    ..       '
J ORDER APPOINTING 1l1E BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LffiER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARAN CE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


HEARING DATE     CASE NUMDR

20 Nov 2014      FD-2014-00673
.j -     -,-''!!ANDTR£ BOAIU>' "Al.llATI011Al.£AUDISCIJSSB)'ONTIIBAlT Alllf'ORCBDISCHMGl; ·JIO,\JtD
.TIONA.LE.       .

Case heard in Washington , D.C.
.        '        ¢ '


Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a persona l appearance with/withou t counsel, and the right to subm it an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant 's request.

..

+ CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHOR ITY
# CHANGE RE CODE

FOIA Exception (b) (6)
FOIA Exception (b) (6)


..       ,JJNDORSE ..

........ *

.,, """"        i·        "'·,,.... ,.      1f.(TE:. 2l§/2j).J Sl5t !h:··

TOo      fROMo
SAF/MRBR         SECRETARY OFTHE AIR FORCE PtRSONNtl. COUNCIL
Al R FORCE DISCHARCE RIM tW BOARD
ISJS COMMAND DR,[£ WINC,3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742      ANDREWS AFB. MD 2076l-'10Cll


AFHQ FORl"I 0-2077, JAN 00       (EF-V2)  Previou s






AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00673

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, a change to reason and authority for the discharge, and a change to the reenlistment code.


The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, via video teleconference between Andrews AFB Maryland, and Randolph AFB Texas, on 20 November 2014.

The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing: Exhibit 5: Applicant's Contentions

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board grants the requested relief of the discharge characterization and narrative; however, the request for change to the re-enlistment code is denied.


ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for a Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good order and Discipline.

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant's record of service included one Letter of Reprimand and one Letter of Counseling. His misconduct included failure to shave, failure to have a current shaving waiver, and failure to pay his government travel card on time.

The applicant contends that the discharge was an act of reprisal based on an incident where he informed his leadership of filing an IG complaint. The Board opined that the evidence contained in the record and obtained from the hearing does not support the applicant's claim that the discharge was based on reprisal. However, after a thorough review of the record and the information supplied by the applicant, the DRB determined there is sufficient evidence to support an issue of inequity. Although the Board does not condone the applicant's misconduct, the Board did find the discharge to be harsh. As such, the Board grants upgrade of discharge to Honorable, and change of reason and authority for discharge; however, the Board denies the change of reenlistment code.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the overall quality of the applicant's service is more accurately reflected by an Honorable service characterization and the reason for discharge is more accurately described as Secretarial Authority.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00466

    Original file (FD-2014-00466.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethe reenlistmentcode. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,at AndrewsAFBonDecember18,2014. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00188

    Original file (FD-2014-00188.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1ORDERAPPOINilNG THE BOARD x* + x• + IEARINC DATE CASENUMBER 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'S RELEASETOTHE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANC ETAPERECORDING OFPERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING11Dec2014FD-2014-00188eheardin Washington,D.C.ldviseapplicant ofthedecision ofthe Boardandtheright tosubmit anapplicationtotheAFBCMR.famesand votes will be madeavailabletotheapplicantatthe applicant'srequest. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00490

    Original file (FD-2013-00490.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonand authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistment code. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,atJoint BaseAndrews,Maryland,on21August2014. Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD 2013 00490

    Original file (FD 2013 00490.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonand authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistment code. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,atJoint BaseAndrews,Maryland,on21August2014. Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00673_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00673_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Applicant receivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-Drug...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00489

    Original file (FD-2013-00489.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN x PERSONALAPPEARANCE RECORDREVIEWNAMEOF COUNSELANDORORGANIZATION ADDRESSAND ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELxMEMBER SITTING UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ X* +X*+ISSUESA94.05 A93.09 INDEX NUMBERA67.10X*+ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00330

    Original file (FD-2008-00330.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A93.01 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIGF OF PERSONNEL FII.E __ COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER , 10 Aug 2010 FD-2008-00330 s at HEANT S ISSUE ANI THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL Ky Case heard in Washington, D.C via video-teleconference from Randolph AFB, Texas. nen: AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00227

    Original file (FD-2014-00227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTl\UDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSANPERSONALAPPEARANCE X RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATION OFCOUNSELMEMBERSITIINGHON GEN UOTHC OTHERISSUESA94.11 A92.0lINDEXNOMBERA67.501ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROF NOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASE TOTiffi BOARDADDmONALEXHffiITSSUBMITTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEAIUNGDATE CASENUMBER04Sep...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00312

    Original file (FD-2014-00312.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto honorable,change thereasonandauthority forthedischarge, andchangethereenlistmentcode. Theapplicantappearedandtestified beforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,at AndrewsAFBon10Dec2014. Thefollowingadditional exhibitsweresubmitted atthehearing: Exhibit #:Applicant'sContentionsTheattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00312

    Original file (FD 2014 00312.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargeto honorable,change thereasonandauthority forthedischarge, andchangethereenlistmentcode. Theapplicantappearedandtestified beforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,at AndrewsAFBon10Dec2014. Thefollowingadditional exhibitsweresubmitted atthehearing: Exhibit #:Applicant'sContentionsTheattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.