Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00023
Original file (FD-2014-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DI SC HARG E REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NA ME OF S ERVICE MEl\IIBER (LA S T , FIRST MIDDLE I NI TIAL)
G R A DE



X        RECORD REVIEW
AFSNISSAN



YES      llo
x

ADDR£SS AND OR ORCANIZA TI ON O f CO UNS CL


MEMBER S ITTING

HON

GE N

U OTHC    OTHER    DENY


X*+

X*+

X*+

X*+





I SS U ES


A9 4 . ll A9 4 . 01




I NDEX NUMBER


A67.3 0 A67 . 90




1 ORD E R APPO I N T I NG THE BOARD
2 APPLICATI ON FOR REVI EW OF DI S C H ARGE
3 L ETT E R OF NOT I F I CAT I ON
4 B R I EF OF P ERSO N N E L F I LE
COUNSEL ' S RE L EASE TO T H E BOARD
ADD I T I ONAL EXH I B I TS SUB M I ITED A T T I ME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
X* +

TAPE RE C ORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

H EA R I NG D ATE     CASE NUMB E R

01 May 2014

FD-201 4 - 00023





Adv i se appl i ca n t of the decision of the Board, t he ri gh t t o a p e r so nal a pp e arance w i th/without counse l , and the right to s ubmit a n app li ca tion to the AFBCMR.

Na m es a nd votes wi ll be made av aila b l e to the applicant a t the appl ic ant's re qu es t.




+ CHANGE REASON AND A U THORITY T O SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY





S •     BR
550 C STREET WEST , SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150 4742
SECR ET ARY O f T HE A I R FORCE PE R S ONNE L COUNCI L
AI R FO R C E Dl SCHARC E RC VI EW 80AR I) 1535 C OM M AND O R , £E W I NC, J R O F L O O R ANDREWS AFB, M D ! 07 ' 1 - 70 0 1


AFHQ FORM 0 - 2077, JAN 00         ( E F-V 2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00023

GENERAL:         The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING:         The Board denies the upgrade of discharge, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

ISSUE:   Applicant received a General discharge characterization for Misconduct:     Serious Offense and Failure to Show Acceptable Qualities of Leadership.

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable and improper because he did not commit the alleged offenses that lead to him being discharged from the Air Force. The applicant also asks that the Board considers his career contributions and recognize that his true character is not consistent with the allegations. The records indicated the applicant was under investigation by AFOSI for wrongfully and fraudulently representing his involvement in financial transactions with Butler County Nebraska Ethanol, LLC; wrongful appropriation of
$400,000.00 of currency, the property of Mr. Stein Revelsby and Norden Technologies; wrongful appropriation of $200,000.00 of currency, the property of Mr. Anthony C. DiMarco and Mr. "Skip" DiMarco; devising a scheme for obtaining money from Mr. Stein Revelsby under false pretenses; and devising a scheme for obtaining money from Mr. Anthony C. DiMarco under false pretenses. The DRB opined that the above listed misconduct is serious for which the applicant could have been found guilty of and punished by a court-martial. The Board concluded the applicant's misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant, reason and authority for the discharge, and the reenlistment code was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, changing the reason and authority for the discharge, or changing the reenlistment code and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00805

    Original file (FD-2013-00805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEJNlTlAL)PERSONALAPPEARANCE , ... .., NAIEorCOUl'o'.S £ LANOORORGANIV.TIONGRADE AFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEW-'ODRF,SSA,0ORORCANIV.TIONOFCOUl'SELMEMBERSITTINGVOTE01'nn:BOHON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xISSUESA94.53INDEX1'1UM81:R A67.10 EXUIBITSSOBMJ'r'fEDT-0T 1 .RD1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00754

    Original file (FD-2014-00754.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor MisconductThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00792

    Original file (FD-2013-00792.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMlOOLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSANPERSONALAPPEARANCEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANl7.ATIONOfCOUNSELx MEMBERsrITING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00594

    Original file (FD-2014-00594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge A discharge isupgradedonly ifthe applicantandtheBoardcanestablishthatan inequityorimproprietytookplaceatthe time of discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00652

    Original file (FD-2012-00652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistment code. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,viavideo teleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMarylandandRandolphAFBTexason27Jan2014. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00526_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00526_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCQUNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUESA94.53INDEXNUMBERA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRlEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGKEARJNGDATE CASENUMBER17Oct2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00031

    Original file (FD-2014-00031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD HEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEWAFSN/SSANADDRtSSANDORORCA'.llZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY x .• xISSUESA92.35INDEXNUMBER A66.00 mintssUB1tP'f! '1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMTITEDAT TIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£ARl1'CDATE CASENUMBER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00524_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00524_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.The Board findsthat neither the evidence ofrecord nor that provided by the applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00311_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00311_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEONALAPPEARANCE x RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZ.ATIONOFCOUNSEi.MEMBERSITTINGHON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY l UESA94.55INDEX NUMBERA67.10lORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHffilTSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDING OFPERSONAL APPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER02Aug2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00645

    Original file (FD-2013-00645.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSI'MIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEPERSONALAPPEARANCEx RECORDREVIEW ADDRESSA. ORORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSELMEMBERSITIINGGEN UOTHC OTHERDENYISSUES A94.SS INDEXNUMBERA67.SO •I 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTIIEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVJEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTlFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDmONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£ARJNCDATE CASENUMBER05Feb2014...