Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00544
Original file (FD-2014-00544.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVI EW BOARD H EARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMB ER (LAST, HRST MIDDLE INITIA L)
(b)(6)
GR<\DE AFSN/SSAN
(b)(6)
TYPE GEN I         PERSONAL APPEARANCE x    I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORCA1' l.ATIO:'i ADDRESS ANO OR ORCANIZATIO:'i or COllNSEL
YES No
x

M EMBER SITTING
VOTE OFTHE BOARD
HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
(b)(6) X*#
X*#
X*#
X*#
X*#
ISSUES   A92.15 INDEX NlJMBER
A67.90
EXJUBJTS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LEHER Of NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMIITED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING Of PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE

25 Mar 2015
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00544
APPLICANT'SISSUE AND TilE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON·n1e/.TrACHED AIR FORCE DISCHAROE R.&VIEW BOARD DECISION/.!, RATIONALE.
Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board , the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to subm it an application to the AFBCMR .



# RE Code
* Narrative Reason

(b)(6)
INDORSEMENT        DATE: 3!27/2015
TO:
S/\FIMRDR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
FROM:
SECRETARY OFTllE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW SOARD
1535 COM\1A 11' l OR, .:F:WING. JRO fl.OOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00    (EF-V2)  Previous






AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00544

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board request to upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Pattern of Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibi lity to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumpt ion, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included two Article 15s for misuse of his Government Travel Card (GTC).

The applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does admit to the misconduct but claims that the Air Force never lost any money because he paid his debt. The Board opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the
applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterizat ion, reason for the discharge or the reenlistment code.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00544

    Original file (FD-2008-00544.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL "VOTE OF THE BOARD HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x x x ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A01.00 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00365

    Original file (FD-2014-00365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00165

    Original file (FD-2014-00165.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandtochangethereenlistment code. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedand requeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. TheBoardfindstheapplicantsubmittednoissuescontestingtheequityor-proprietyofthedischarge,and afterathoroughreviewoftherecord,theBoardwasunabletoidentifyanythatwouldjustifyachangeof discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00323

    Original file (FD-2014-00323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebefore theDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-Drug AbuseTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00401

    Original file (FD-2014-00401.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,and tochange thereenlistmentcode. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereview becompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00463

    Original file (FD-2014-00463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandtochangethereasonand authorityforthedischarge. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebefore theDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorslead ingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00076

    Original file (FD-2015-00076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals for upgrade ofdischarge toHonorable,achange to the reason andauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance before theDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00592

    Original file (FD-2014-00592.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeof the discharge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -ConductPrejudicialtoGoodOrderandDiscipline.TheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00542

    Original file (FD-2014-00542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicant wasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00710

    Original file (FD-2014-00710.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargeto Honorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)but declinedandrequests that thereview becompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthe factors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoard grantstherequestedrelief.TheBoard findsevidenceintherecordtosubstantiateanimpropriety thatwouldjustify achangeinthedischarge. ...