Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00165
Original file (FD-2014-00165.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVI EW BOARD HEARI NG RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE lEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)     GRADE    AFSN/SSAN
(b)(6)   (b)(6)
TYPE GEN         I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL  NAME OF COUNSEi.AND OR ORCANIZATIO:-/    ADDRESS ANO OR ORGANIZATION Or COUNSEL
''ES     No
x
VOTE OF THE BOA RD
MEM BER SITTING         HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b)(6)   x
x x







ISSUES




A94.53






INDEX NUMBER




A67.03
x
x
EXlll BITSSUBMITTED TOTHE BOARD
ORDER APPO INTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REV IEW OF DISCHARG E
LETTER OF NOT!F ICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARI NG OATE    CASE NUMBER

19 Feb 2015      FD-2014-00165
APPLICANTS ISSUE AND 'JliE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATlONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE .

Case heard i n Wash ington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the A FBCMR.







(b)(6)



INDORSEMENT
-.-
DATE: 212612015                

TO:      FRO.\I:
SAF/M RBR        S£CRl:'.TARY Of THE i\IR fORCE nRSONNEL COUNCIL
AJR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550      ISJ5 COMMAl\0 OR, Kt: WINC, JKD tl.OOK
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742      ANDREWS A.-S.MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous





AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00165

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.


FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the ischarge.

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or- propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge.


ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Commission of a Serious Offense

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted . In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumpt ion, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant 's record of service included one Article 15 for stolen government property.

The applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. He contends that he made a mistake due to immaturity. The applicant requests the opportunity to bring honor back to himself and be able to serve in the Air Force and serve his country again. The Board found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of
discharge. The Board , after a thorough review of the record, concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case. The Board did not find any evidence of impropriety or inequity
to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.


CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation , was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.


Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00558

    Original file (FD-2014-00558.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicant wasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforUnsatisfactory Participation The AirForceDischargeReviewBoard,under...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00335

    Original file (FD-2014-00335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00680

    Original file (FD-2014-00680.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischargetoIlonorableandtochangethereason andauthorityforthedischarge. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00068

    Original file (FD-2015-00068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00463

    Original file (FD-2014-00463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandtochangethereasonand authorityforthedischarge. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebefore theDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorslead ingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00629

    Original file (FD-2014-00629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined and requests thatthereview becompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached brief containsavailablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00710

    Original file (FD-2014-00710.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargeto Honorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)but declinedandrequests that thereview becompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthe factors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoard grantstherequestedrelief.TheBoard findsevidenceintherecordtosubstantiateanimpropriety thatwouldjustify achangeinthedischarge. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00165

    Original file (FD-2009-00165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME. ¥t X¥+ X*+ XFt ISSUES A01.00 INDEX NUMBER AGT.10 OO : EXHIBIFS: SUBMITTED TO THLE BOARD oo A92.41 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A95.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE oe 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 7 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RI ASK TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD 2013 00263

    Original file (FD 2013 00263.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable Thefollowing additionalexhibitsweresubmittedatthe hearing:Exhibit5:CertificatesExhibit6:NewsarticleTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factors leadingtothe discharge. TheBoard opined theapplicantwasolderthanthevastmajorityoffirst-tennmemberswhoproperlyadheretotheAirForce'sstandardsofconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00263

    Original file (FD-2013-00263.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable Thefollowing additionalexhibitsweresubmittedatthe hearing:Exhibit5:CertificatesExhibit6:NewsarticleTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factors leadingtothe discharge. TheBoard opined theapplicantwasolderthanthevastmajorityoffirst-tennmemberswhoproperlyadheretotheAirForce'sstandardsofconduct.