Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00447
Original file (FD-2014-00447.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AJR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARIN G RECORD
NAM E OF SERVICE MEM BER (LAST, FI RST MI DDLE IN ITIAL)         CRADIC
(b) (6)
TYPE GEi        I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COlNSD.  ""\IE or COC":-.StL A'. 0 OR ORCA.\IZATIOS         \ OORESS A'(0 OR ORCA.'IZ.\TIOS Of COUN>EL
n:s      No
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING  110\1     GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  x

x x x
x
ISSUES   A94.SS   INDEX NUMBER    A67.10   EXH181TS SUB"ITTEOTOTHE BOARD
I ORDCR APPOINTING 11I E BOARD
APPLICATION f-OR R EV IEW OF OISCliARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICAT ION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUN EL" RELEA E ro THE BOARD
ADOI I IONAL EXH IUI rs SU UM11TE:.D AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEAAANCE
TAPE RIX'ORDl'IG OF PERSO'IAL APPEARANCE 1IEARING

H EAJU C DATE    C.\SE 1'l:IBER

16 Apr 20 15     FD-20 14-00447
NPLICANT' SISSUE .\l'.OTllCBOMD"S OECISKlNAL llATIONA1.£AA6 OISClJSSm ON THEATTACllEOAIJl FOltCI; OISCHAAGERFVlEWllOMD DliCISIO'OAL IUTKlNAUi.

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applican t of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance wi th/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR .








(b) (6--

L'llOORSEME:\T    DAT!!;: 4127/ZOIS
TO:      rRO I:
SAF/MRBR         SECRETAR\ Of Tll EAIRfORCE PERSOXJ\l:L COU CIL
All FORCE OISCl!ARCE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WE T. UITE 40       I CO\l\ l\, 0OR. EE \\INC. JRD FLOOR
RA DOLPH AFB. TX 78150-4742      A l>R[\\ SAfB,\ID l076!-7901


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00447

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disciplinary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the perti nent standards of equity and propriety . The applicant's record of service included two Letters of Reprimand and one Letter of Counseling for failing to go to duty on time (2x's) and wearing ornamentation in lip pierci ng while in uniform and failing to obey an order to remove it.

The applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh for the minor infractions that were done. Applicant also feels there was an impropriety, stating that the paperwork reflects something much harsher than the actual infractions committed. The DRB opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her negative behavior but failed to do so. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board found applicant's issues to be without merit and concluded the misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedura l and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation , was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determi nes the discharge should remai n unchanged .

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00805

    Original file (FD-2013-00805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEJNlTlAL)PERSONALAPPEARANCE , ... .., NAIEorCOUl'o'.S £ LANOORORGANIV.TIONGRADE AFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEW-'ODRF,SSA,0ORORCANIV.TIONOFCOUl'SELMEMBERSITTINGVOTE01'nn:BOHON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xISSUESA94.53INDEX1'1UM81:R A67.10 EXUIBITSSOBMJ'r'fEDT-0T 1 .RD1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00334

    Original file (FD-2014-00334.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceived aGeneral...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00792

    Original file (FD-2013-00792.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMlOOLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSANPERSONALAPPEARANCEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANl7.ATIONOfCOUNSELx MEMBERsrITING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00439_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00439_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailable servicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischargeTheBoard findsthat neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00128

    Original file (FD-2015-00128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeof dischargetoHonorable,change the reasonandauthority fordischarge andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached brief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00206

    Original file (FD-2015-00206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable,tochangethe reason andauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. ISSUE: Theapplicant receivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-Minor Infractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00221_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00221_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD ... • ' •• t ,,1,,1:I ' ST,FIRSTllDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANPERSONAL APPEARANCENAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZA110NxADDRESSA. 'IDORORGANIZATIONOFCOllNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSt1ESA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMllEllA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00532_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00532_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOF · COUNSEL.,..........----:- ------ - --- --·...,.........._.."! G HON GEN UOTIIC1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARING Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00095

    Original file (FD-2015-00095.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicant wasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischargeISSUE: Theapplicantreceived...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00658

    Original file (FD-2014-00658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischarge to Honorable. Theapplicant wasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthe factors leadingtothedischarge.