Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00439_13
Original file (FD-2013-00439_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)



PERSONAL APPEARANCE

G RADE



x


AFSN/SSAi 'I

AD DRESS AND OR ORCANI7.ATION Of COUNSEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON

GEN      UOTHC

OTHER

DENY
x x x x
x


A67.10

1       
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2       
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 L ETTE R OF NOTIFICA TIO N
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL' S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
A DDITIONA L EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT T IME OF PER SONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


R E ARIN G DATE     CASE N1JMBE R

02 Aug 2 0 1 3      FD-2 0 13-00439

Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board , the righ t to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to t he AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's reque st.











SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, T X 78150-4742
SECRETARY O F T1lE AIR FORCE PERS()N)(EL COUN CIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1 !3$ COMMAND DR , EE WINO, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         ( EF -V2)  Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00439
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant was discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for minor disciplinary infractions. Applicant admits to making a few mistakes while in the Air Force; however he states he was put on the DOS Rollback list provided he had no other misconduct. He states that a month
before his separation due date, he was wrongfully accused of being late to work which initiated his discharge from the Air Force. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and two Letters of Reprimand. His misconduct included failure to wear protective gear, sleep on post, made false claims, and failure to report to guardmount. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on February 8, 2011) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.




Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00439

    Original file (FD-2014-00439.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuseTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard, underits...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00439

    Original file (FD-2010-00439.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN SRA TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No X MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER DENY xX xX x x : x ISSUES A94,53 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 A92.35 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A92.03 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00774

    Original file (FD-2013-00774.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAM£OFSERVIctMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEIN1TIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANPERSONAL APPEARANCEX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSEi,,00xMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSUESA94.53L'<DEX!>1JMBERA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFlLECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMTITEOATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£AR.INCDATE CASENlJMB[R13Mar2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00524_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00524_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.The Board findsthat neither the evidence ofrecord nor that provided by the applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00328_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00328_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicant appearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB),without counsel,atAndrews AFBon01Aug2013. Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmittedatthehearing:Exhibit#5:Applicant'sContentionsTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00615

    Original file (FD-2013-00615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANlZATlONOFCOUELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENYxA94.0SA67.101 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATI: CASENUMBER10Jan2014 FD-2013-00615Case...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00771

    Original file (FD-2013-00771.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMlDOLEJNmAL)GRADEPERSONAL APPEARANCEx RECORD REVIEW YESADORESSAJ'IOORORCANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHERxISSUESA94.55INDEXNUMBERA67.10EXHIBITSSDTOT ARD1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDlTIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITIEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDING OF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGllEARINCDA1'E CASENUMBtR17Apr2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00478_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00478_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDGRADEAFSNfSSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSAHi>ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELISSUESA93.01INDEXNUMBERA67.10HON GEN UOTHC OTHERA93.07 A66.00 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'S RELEASETOTHEBOARDADDmONALEXHIBITSSUBMilTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGllt:ARJNGDATE CASENUMBEROSSep2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00221_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00221_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD ... • ' •• t ,,1,,1:I ' ST,FIRSTllDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANPERSONAL APPEARANCENAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZA110NxADDRESSA. 'IDORORGANIZATIONOFCOllNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSt1ESA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMllEllA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00687

    Original file (FD-2013-00687.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...