Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00629
Original file (FD-2014-00629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NA ME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)     GRADE
(b) (6)

TYPE GEN         I        PERSONAL APPEARAN CE    x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSENAM E or COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION     ADDRESS MD OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
M EMBER SITTING         HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  x

x x
x x
ISSUES   A94.0S   INO&X N li"M BCR         A66.00   EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHA RGE
LETIER OF NOTIFICATION
BRJEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL0 S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEA RANCE HEARING

HEARI NG DATE    CASE NUMBER

09 Jun 2015      FD-2014-00629
Al'PLICANT0SISSUE AND THE BOAJtD"S DECISIONAL RATIONALE AR.E DISCUSSED ON Tiie ATTAOIEOAIR fORCI! DISCHA.RGE RllY1EW BOAAD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

Case heard i n Washi ngton, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to subm it an application to the AFBCMR.








(b) (6)



INDORSEME        DA'tE: 71812015
TO:      fROM:
SAF/MRBR         Sr::c:RETARV OFTH E A IR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST.SUITE 40       153$ COMJ\olAND OR.[!;: WINC,JRO PLOOR
RA NDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742     ANDREWS AFB.MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00       (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00629

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record .

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Drug Abuse

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted . In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. In order to adhere to Mental Health Amendments to 10 USC 1553, a physician with specialized training on mental health disorders was present for this board. The applicant 's record of service included one Article 15 for use of marijuana .

The applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. He submitted that his drug use was a result of ongoing stress factors in his personal life. After review of the records the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use.
Although the applicant may have been experiencing an unusual amount stress, within his almost six years of service and required resiliency training, he was aware of services available to assist with his issues.

The applicant also claims impropriety by not being afforded an Administrative Discharge Review Board. The Board found that based on the notification date of the discharge; the member did not meet the required six years of service for an administrative board IAW AFI 36-3208.

The negative aspects of the willfu l misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of the applicant's performance, therefore the discharge was found to be appropriate. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00203

    Original file (FD-2014-00203.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgradeofdischarge tohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00586

    Original file (FD-2014-00586.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicant wasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReview Board(DRB)butdeclinedandrequests that thereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00013

    Original file (FD-2015-00013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00063

    Original file (FD-2009-00063.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. After a review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his 23 months of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board noted the issue was common result of miscommunication, at the time of discharge,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00323

    Original file (FD-2014-00323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebefore theDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-Drug AbuseTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00688

    Original file (FD-2014-00688.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappeals forupgrade ofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00751

    Original file (FD-2014-00751.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischarge forMisconduct -DrugAbuseThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00702

    Original file (FD-2014-00702.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable,tochangethe reason andauthorityforthedischarge, andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge,thechangeofreasonand authority...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00100

    Original file (FD-2014-00100.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00614

    Original file (FD-2014-00614.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.