Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00224
Original file (FD-2014-00224.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE    AFSNISSAN



PERSONAL APPEARANCE     X        RECORD REVIEW

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OFCOUNSEL


:        -        '"""r_ ·-, (1;.r ·
) ' · - -- '"'"' --

MEMBER SITTING
!
HON      GEN      UOTHC
x x x

x

OTHER

DENY








x


ISSUES
A94.06

INDEX NUMBER

A66.00


1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTEROF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TOTHE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED ATTIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

04 Sep 2014      FD-2014-00224
'' ' •    "' 1     ' ) >'<         \ I •      1 r 1 j >     11 1 ' , >     ,j- '   : 1 - , '        , ' ' " r (,  - '      " ""'

-        ..       , ' .   .        - - ._,._       ,... .... "    _ _ _ _., ,_,_ _        - - - --- -     ,
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
, \/,/    -- - -- - - """" , . -         ...      .. "-


Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.








l        i. 1 ·., j 't ' ., ".' \ 1        >,.,',.t ....    :' 1 !.I!

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST,SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARV OFTHE AIR FORCE PERSONNE L COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535COMMAND DR,EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS Afll,MD 20762 7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00224

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The discharge is upgraded to general.
The Board finds that after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify anything that would justify an upgrade to honorable. However, based upon the record, the Board finds the applicant's service characterization inequitable.

ISSUE: Applicant received an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge for Misconduct: Drug Abuse.

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant's record of service included two Article 15s. His misconduct included the wrongful use of marijuana on divers occasions between 1 December 2012 and 25 March 2013.

Applicant submitted that his discharge was inequitable because his discharge characterization was unfair and in no way was it a reflection of his service while on active duty. The applicant does submit that he received no negative ratings on his performance reports and besides the marijuana use, he caused no trouble. The Board found that the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. However, the Board reviewed the entire record and found that the service characterization the applicant received was harsher than usual for marijuana use.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found the discharge should be upgraded to general.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the overall quality of applicant's service is more accurately reflected by an Under honorable Conditions (General) service characterization under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2005 | FD2005-00224

    Original file (FD2005-00224.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ?A-rrnr nn o n r o n &+crnrhlw / 7 1 " 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 ) RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 SAFIMRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 I AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH A1C) 1. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 10 Dec 02 for 6 yrs. - ' CHARGE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00428

    Original file (FD-2014-00428.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoGeneral. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00550

    Original file (FD-2014-00550.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00586

    Original file (FD-2014-00586.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicant wasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReview Board(DRB)butdeclinedandrequests that thereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00791

    Original file (FD-2013-00791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorableandtochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheDRBfindstheapplicantsubmittednoissuescontestingtheequityorproprietyofthedischarge,andafterathoroughreview oftherecord,the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00219

    Original file (FD-2014-00219.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailable servicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.TheBoardfindsthatneithertheevidenceofrecordnorthatprovidedbytheapplicantsubstantiatesan inequity orimpropriety...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00386

    Original file (FD-2014-00386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasoffered apersonalappearancebefore theDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00614

    Original file (FD-2014-00614.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00439

    Original file (FD-2014-00439.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuseTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard, underits...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00769

    Original file (FD-2013-00769.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode. The applicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withcounsel,atAndrewsAFBon7August2014. Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmittedatthehearing:Exhibit5:CertificatesExhibit6:ResumeExhibit7:MedicalStatementExhibit8:VerificationofpreviousemploymentTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.