Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00791
Original file (FD-2013-00791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE



PERSONAL APPEARANCE
x        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL




MEMBER SITTING

HON

GEN      UOTHC    O THE R

DENY
x x x x x

ISSIJE S
A94.SS
INDEX NUMBER
A66.00

1       
ORD E R APPOINTING THE BOARD
2       
APPLICATION F OR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3       
LETTER OF NO TIFICATION
4       
BRIEF O F PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUB MITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE REC ORDING OF PERSON AL APPEARANCE HEARING


HEARING DA TE     CASE NUMBER

01 May 2014      FD-2013-00791


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the deci s ion o f t he Board , the right to a personal appearance w i th/without counsel, and the right to sub mit an application to t he AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's reque st.












TO:


SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WES T, SU ITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

FR.OM :


SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNC1 L AIR FORCE DISCHJ\par l!GE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR. EE WING, JRD FLOO R
ANDREWS AFB , MD 20762- 7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00  (EF-V2)  Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00791
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The DRB finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. Therefore, the Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a general discharge for Misconduct-Drug Abuse.

Although not explicitly stated the applicant contends that his discharge was inequitable because his DD Form 214 states he completed his first term of service, and he was discharged after he entered the extension to his first enlistment. The Board found this contention to have no merit. On 15 November 2011, the applicant extended his enlistment for 19 months with a new date of separation (DOS) of 7 March 2014. Based on this extension, the applicant did not re-enlist, therefore, he did not complete his first term of service.

The record indicates the applicant received an Art 15 for wrongful use of marijuana on divers occasions. The applicant was identified during a random urinalysis on 26 October 2012 and a subsequent bickel test on 8 November 2012. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his five years of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board found the negative aspects of the willful misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of the applicant's performance and concluded that the discharge was appropriate. Moreover, the Board determined the discharge characterization is based solely on the current enlistment, which includes any extension of the enlistment made with the consent of the member, as prescribed by regulation.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00533_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00533_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNISSANX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANll.ATIONOFCOUNSEL Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00288_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00288_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICE MEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNISSAN x PERSONALAPPEARANCENAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATIONRECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTING • i l I ' iGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) \ l I ! I l X+* Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) I I l l t ' Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) I ! I ' II \ 1 \ I l IX+*X+* !'

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00639_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00639_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequesttochangeofreasonandauthorityfordischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcodeisdenied. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00738

    Original file (FD-2013-00738.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FlRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)YES NoxGRADE AFSN/SSAN X RECORDREVIEWADOR£SSANDORORGANll.ATIONorCOUNSELVOTEOfTllEBOARDMEMBERSITTINGUOTHC OTHER DENY1ORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVlEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETI'EROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFlLECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATI01 May2014 CASt:NUMBt.R...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00023

    Original file (FD-2014-00023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    S • BR550CSTREETWEST,SUITE40RANDOLPHAFB,TX781504742SECRETARYOfTHEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCILAIRFORCEDlSCHARCERCVIEW80ARI)1535COMMANDOR,£EWINC,JROFLOORANDREWSAFB,MD!07'1-7001AFHQFORM0-2077,JAN00 (EF-V2) Previous AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDDECISIONALRATIONALE CASENUMBER FD-2014-00023GENERAL: The applicant appeals forupgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00688

    Original file (FD-2013-00688.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,nRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSANPERSONALAPPEARANCEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSCLxMEMBERSITTINGUOTHC OTI!ER DENYx•+ A84.00 ;BXH181 MmEDTQllUi(BO.vnORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEIT£ROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTlIEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEx•+x•+x•+.x•+TAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGllEARINCDATE CASENUMHR13Mar2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00321_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00321_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY X*x•ISSVESA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMBERA67.301ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLJCATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER 19Jttl2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00774

    Original file (FD-2013-00774.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAM£OFSERVIctMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEIN1TIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANPERSONAL APPEARANCEX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSEi,,00xMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSUESA94.53L'<DEX!>1JMBERA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFlLECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMTITEOATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£AR.INCDATE CASENlJMB[R13Mar2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00820

    Original file (FD-2013-00820.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEL"ITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSEL MEMBERSITTrNG GENUOTHCOTHER DENY x•+ISSUESA94.S4INDEXNUMBERA49.001ORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARDx•+x•+xx•+2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHTBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENVMBER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00220

    Original file (FD-2014-00220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsfor achangetothereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:The Boarddeniesthechangeofreasonandauthorityfordischargeandchangeofreenlistmentcode.