Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00711
Original file (FD-2014-00711.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REV IEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAM E OF ERVICE MEMBER (IAST, FIRST MlDOLE INTTL\L)      GRADE
{b) (6)

TYPE BCD        I        PE RSONAL APPEARANCE    x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNstNA\1£ OFCOUNSEL ANl> OR ORCA1'17.ATION     ADDRESS A'.ID OR ORCMIZATlO OFCOU'ISEL
VIS      No       {b) (6)   {b) (6)
x
VOTE OFTHE BOARD
M EMBER SITTING  HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DEN Y
{
b) (6)   x
I        x
x
x x
issues   A94 .5lND1!X NUM ORR   A68.00   l!XHJBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
I ORDER APPOINTING TI IC DOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW Of DISCHARGE
LETIER Of NOTIFICATION
BRIEF Of PERSONNEL FILE
COL'NSE L'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIM E OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONA L APPEARANCE HCA RING

ll£ARINC DATE     CASE NUMBER

26 Jun 2015      FD-2014-00711
APPUCAllTS :SS\/E A'.ID BOAR.D'S DECISIONAL RATIONA.l.ll Al\£ l>ISCUSS£D ON TICE ATTAC'HED AIR FORCE DISCHAJlGG REVIEW BOARD l>EC1Sl0>1AL UTIO"IALE

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise appl icant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel. and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.








{b){6)
I


INOORSliMliN l   U/\ I t:: 1nu1zu1:1
TO:      FROM:
SAF/MRBR         SECRETARY OPTHE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCI L
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST. U ITE 40     I !JSCOMMA.'ID OR. EE WlC. 3RO f'LOOR
RANDOLPH AFB. TX 78150-4742      ANDREWSAFB, MD 2076? 7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00711

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to General.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a Bad Conduct discharge for Court-Martial (AFI 36-3208, Chap 4)

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. In order to adhere to Mental Health Amendments to 10 USC 1553, a physician with specialized training on mental health disorders was present for this board. The applicant's record of service included two Article 15s and a Special Court-Martial conviction. His misconduct included failure to go to appointed place of duty, operated a car while drunk, disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer, unlawfully grabbing and pushing someone in the chest, and breakjng order of being restricted to Dover AFB.

The applicant contends that his misconduct can easily be traced to the traumatic effect of two serious automobile accidents, and that he should have been discharged following the second accident in a timely fashion through the MEB process. The Board finds that because the applicant did not receive an administrative discharge, his contention of inequity is not applicable. The applicant received a Bad Conduct Discharge, a punitive discharge, as part of his sentence resulting from a Special Court-Martial conviction. Under the provisions of Section 1553, 10 USC, the only basis for a change of a Bad Conduct discharge is clemency. The applicant presented evidence which the DRB opined did not warrant granting clemency.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant 's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate under the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge.



Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00468

    Original file (FD-2014-00468.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge toHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00780

    Original file (FD-2014-00780.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgradeofdischargeto Honorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00715

    Original file (FD-2013-00715.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDGRADE AFSN/SSANX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANIZATJONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUESA94.SSINDEXNUMBERA68.001ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTlFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£ARINCDATE CASENUMBERlOJao2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00053

    Original file (FD-2015-00053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoGeneral.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00428_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00428_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE BCD x I PERSONALAPPEARANCE I RECORDREVIEW ;' · :lfw: .,,,,,,, ,,,ii•NAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATIONYES No x ADDRESSAND ORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL MEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHCOTHER DENYxISSUES A93.19A94.05INDEXNU1\1BERA68.00 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD 2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOfDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION 4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00683

    Original file (FD-2013-00683.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEW BOARDHEARINGRECORDNAM£OF SERVICEMEMBER{LAST,FIRST MIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEONAL APPEARANCEx RECORDREVIEW ADDRESSANDOR ORGANIZATON OFCQUNSEL. ----- _,....,.. ..-·...·-A68.00 HON GEN UOTHC OTHER 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEWOF DISCHARGELETTER OFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIME OFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENIJM8£R13 Mar2014 FD-2013-00683 - -...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00631_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00631_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINJTlAL)GRADE AFSNISSANRSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITflNGHON GEN UOTHC OTHERxxA93.01 A94.SSINDEXNUMBERA68.001ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD i APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRJEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00187_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00187_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEW BOARDHEARINGRECORDST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGUOTHCOTHERDENYx•+X*+X*+X*+ X*+A68.00 A94.55 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD 2 APPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETTEROFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDING OFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE CASE NUMBER19Jul2013 FD-2013-00187 Case...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2013-00493

    Original file (FD-2013-00493.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorableachangetothereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel,atAndrewsAFBonJune 08,2015.Therewerenoadditionalexhibitssubmittedatthehearing. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2012-00410

    Original file (FD-2012-00410.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoGeneral.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge ISSUE: Theapplicantreceiveda BadConductDischargeTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underitsresponsibility...