Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | fd-2013-00284_13
Original file (fd-2013-00284_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEER (LAST,FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE



PERSONAL APPEARANCE

RECORD REVIEW


ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OFCOUNSEL

Mr. Mi.ke Jaeger, Texas Veterans Commission

' . ·-    . - - .         -        -        - - - - · ·-       --- ----·
-        - ·· .."',
:oe J,

MEMBER SfITING
HON      OEN      UOIBC    OIBER
DENY


X*+ X*+ X*+
X*+ X*+

















HEARING DATE    

11Sep 2013       FD-2013-00284

Case heard in Washington, D.C.
A94.S3

l ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FD.E
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


Advise applicant of the decision of the Board and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
*RE Code
+Narrative Reason










SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WFST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SECRETARY ornu:AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1$15COMMAND DR, EE WJNC, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWSAFB, MD 20761-7001


AFHQ FORM 0:.2077, JAN 00        (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00284
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, via video teleconference between Andrews AFB, Maryland, and Randolph AFB, Texas, on 11 Sep 2013.

The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing: Exhibit # 5: Applicant's Contentions

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for the discharge and change of reenlistment code.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Minor Disciplinary Infractions.

The applicant's contentions were unclear, but he appealed for an upgrade based upon inequity. The records indicate applicant received an Article 15 and four Letters of Reprimand for misconduct. Acts of misconduct cited in the record included leaving an accountable composite tool kit asset out on the flight line; failure to pass a dorm room inspection; citation for driving with expired liability insurance; indecent gestures towards a Japanese national; and engaging in sexual activity with a civilian, not his wife. The DRB questioned why the applicant felt his discharge was inequitable, and he was unsure. He did state he was under stress related to a divorce and relationship problems. He admitted his sexual misconduct towards a Japanese national in a local store was offensive in nature and could have negatively impacted relations between the host nation and the United States. During the conclusion phase of the Board, it became apparent that the applicant had not had access to his mental health records. The Board faxed a copy of the records from AHLTA, the Air Force medical records system. Afterwards, the applicant responded in writing and contended he should have received a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) because his mental state was documented "not worldwide qualified." The Board found his contention unsubstantiated. According to AFI 48-123, Adjustment Disorder, the diagnosis in his records, renders an individual unsuited for duty rather than unfit, and as such, is subject to administrative discharge. An MEB, therefore, was not appropriate or required in his case. The DRB opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded that the seriousness of the applicant's willful misconduct outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge, change of narrative reason for discharge or reenlistment code, and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00492_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00492_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDOR ORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSELA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMBERHON GEN UOTl;IC OTHER 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDAH CASENVMllER03Oct2013FD-2013-00492Caseheardin Washington,D.C.Adviseapplicantofthedecision oftheBoard,theright...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00455

    Original file (FD-2008-00455.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1536 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00455 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for discharge. ISSUE: Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00221_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00221_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD ... • ' •• t ,,1,,1:I ' ST,FIRSTllDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANPERSONAL APPEARANCENAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZA110NxADDRESSA. 'IDORORGANIZATIONOFCOllNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSt1ESA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMllEllA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00506_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00506_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00028

    Original file (FD-2009-00028.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL : : : AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFR, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE- FD-2009-00028 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. After a...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00212_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00212_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDLAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE ..- PERSONALAPPEARANCE---- x RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDOR ORCANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSIITINGGENUOTHC OTHER DENY 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPFARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEAIUNCDATE CASE l\1JMll £ R19Jul2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00284

    Original file (FD2003-00284.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    | 3_| LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 | BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE L COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF 19 Aug 2003 FD-2003-00284 [ PERSONAL APPEARANCE Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR RANCE = oT SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00330

    Original file (FD-2008-00330.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A93.01 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIGF OF PERSONNEL FII.E __ COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER , 10 Aug 2010 FD-2008-00330 s at HEANT S ISSUE ANI THE BOARD'S DECISIONAL Ky Case heard in Washington, D.C via video-teleconference from Randolph AFB, Texas. nen: AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00587

    Original file (FD-2014-00587.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING : TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractions