Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00794
Original file (FD-2013-00794.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Affi FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAM E OFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE    AFSNISSAN



X        RECORD REVIEW


ADDRESS AND OR ORCANIZATION OF COUNSEL

x

MEMBER SITTING

HON
GEN      UOTHC
OTHER    DENY
x x x x
x


ISSUES

A94 .55

INDEX NU IBER

A67.10
hlBITS SllBMJTfED TO '!HE        ARD
ORDER APPOINTING TllE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARG E
3 LEITER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRlEf OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO ntE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PGRSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


H E,.RINO DA1'E  CAS£NUM8£R

13 Mar 2014      FD-2013-00794
APPUC D'S DECISIONAi.II.ATIONAl-6 ARI!  
Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, theright to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR .

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.












TO:


SAF/M RBR
550 C STREET WEST,SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742


SECRETARY orTIIE Al R fORCt: PERSONNEL COUNCIL. AIR FORCE DISOIAROE REVIEW HOARD
lS COMMAND DR. EE WINO,JRD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFI.MD 20762·704l I


AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00  (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00794

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions Although not explicitly stated, the applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh.
The records indicated the applicant received one Article 15 and four Letters of Reprimand. Her misconduct included failed to go to duty on time (3x), absent without leave, used government travel card for personal purposes, failed to return to local area at end of leave, with intent to deceive signed official statement indicating no change in leave when had not returned to local area, failed to go to mandatory unit PT, and failed to answer cell phone during squadron recall. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her negative behavior. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant's service outweighed the positive contributions she made in her Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the ·discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00080

    Original file (FD-2014-00080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    * MEl\<lBER SITTING HON GEN uowc OTHER DENY x xx ;ssurs A94.0S INDEXNUMBER A67.10 s.,.J IJSMITn. ;DTODIEBOARD •" 'ill 1ORDERAPPOINT INGTIJEBOARD2 APPLICATION FOR REVlEWOFDISCHARGELETIEROF NOTlfJCATIONORIEFOFPERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITS SUDMITIED ATTIME OF PERSONALAPPEARANCETAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE CASENUMBER05 Nov2014 FD-2014-00080 j UPUC'SL'lIJE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00374_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00374_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDBEARINGRECORDGRADEX RECORDREVIEADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELISSUESA67.10HON GENUOTHC OTHER DENY A94.551ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD 2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER19Jul2013 FD-2013-00374CaseheardinWashington,D.C.AdviseapplicantofthedecisionoftheBoard,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00639_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00639_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequesttochangeofreasonandauthorityfordischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcodeisdenied. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00682

    Original file (FD-2013-00682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARING RECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST,RRST l\UDDLE INITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSAN X RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANIZATION01'COUl'ISEL xMEMBER SITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUllS INDEX NUMB&RA92.21A94.SSA67.10ORDER APPOINTINGTHE BOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEWOf DISCHAR GE3 LITTEROFNOTIFICATION 4 BRIEFOFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL"S RELEASETOnlEBOARD ADDITIONALEXlilBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDING 01'PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGlt &ARINCDAT! ;;...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00544_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00544_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Applicant received aGeneral dischargeforApatternofMisconduct-ConductPrejudicial toGood...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00268_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00268_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthe discharge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinary...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00451_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00451_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: Therequestfortheupgradeofthedischarge,tochangeofreasonandauthorityfordischarge, andtochangethereenlistmentcodeisdenied. HebelievesheshouldhavemetaMedicalEvaluationBoard(MEB) priortobeingdischarged.TherecordsindicatedtheapplicantreceivedtwoArticle 15s,oneVacation,sevenLettersofReprimand,oneLetterof Counseling,andoneRecordofIndividualCounseling. Afteracompleteandthoroughreviewoftheapplicant'srecordsandtheevidencesubmittedbythe applicant,theBoardfoundtheapplicant'scontentiontohavenomerit.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00587

    Original file (FD-2014-00587.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING : TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00661

    Original file (FD-2013-00661.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00453_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00453_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonand authorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoardrequestfortheupgradeofthedischarge,tochangethereasonandauthorityfor...