Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00374_13
Original file (FD-2013-00374_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD BEARING RECORD
GRADE



X        RECORD REVIE
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNS EL
























ISSUES
















A92.35





















I N D£X NU MBER














A67.10

HON      GEN

UOTH C    OTHER    DENY
x x x
x
x

A94.55
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANC E HEARING


HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

19 Jul 2013      FD-2013-00374

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.












SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742


FROM:


SECRETARV OFTHE AIR FORCE PERSONl\'EL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ISJS COMMAND DR, El!WING,3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB,lllD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00        (EF-V2)  Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00374
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disciplinary Infractions

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was based on three isolated incidents of being a few minutes late. The records indicated the applicant received one Article 15, six Letters of Reprimand, and two Letters of Counseling. Her misconduct included failed to report to town hall meeting and write story on event, departed duty location and failed to go to scheduled 5K run, failed to go to duty on time (1 lx), failed to cover WG/CC Veteran's Day speech, took a day of leave without approval, failed to follow orders, failed to maintain adequate contact with supervisor, absent from duty (2x), and failed to answer emergency public address phone. The applicant was notified and acknowledged receipt and the reasons for her discharge on
26 July 2011, therefor her contentions have no merit. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her negative behavior. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant's service outweighed the positive contributions she made in her Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00374

    Original file (FD-2008-00374.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied. ISSUE: The applicant contends discharge was inequitable based on the following reasons: 1. The Board further concludes that there is no legal or equitable basis for change of reason and authority for discharge, or change of reenlistment code Attachment: Examiner's Brief

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00544_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00544_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Applicant received aGeneral dischargeforApatternofMisconduct-ConductPrejudicial toGood...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00583

    Original file (FD-2013-00583.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE X RECORDREVIEWAFSNISSANADDRESSAND OR ORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY1ORDER APPOINTINGTHEBOARD.2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDING OF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGREARING DATE. CASENUMBER 10Jan 2014 FD-2013-00583...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00268_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00268_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthe discharge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinary...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00303_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00303_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonand authority forthedischarge, andtochangethereenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailable servicerecord. Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00794

    Original file (FD-2013-00794.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AffiFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD NAMEOFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANIZATION OF COUNSEL xMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUESA94 .55INDEXNUIBERA67.10hlBITSSllBMJTfEDTO'!HE ARDORDERAPPOINTING TllE BOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRlEfOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOntEBOARDADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTEDAT TIME OFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPGRSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHE,.RINODA1'E...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00661

    Original file (FD-2013-00661.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00731

    Original file (FD-2013-00731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSAN X RECORD REVIEWADDRESS AND ORORGANIZ.ATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENYx INDEXNVM.BER A66.00 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARING DATE CASENUMBER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00587

    Original file (FD-2014-00587.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING : TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00221_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00221_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD ... • ' •• t ,,1,,1:I ' ST,FIRSTllDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANPERSONAL APPEARANCENAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZA110NxADDRESSA. 'IDORORGANIZATIONOFCOllNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSt1ESA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMllEllA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE...