Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00597_13
Original file (FD-2013-00597_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD REARING RECORD
GRADE    t\FSNISSAN


X        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON

GEN      UOTHC

O THER    DENY
x x x x
x


ISSUES

AOl.43 A94.55

INDEX NUMBER

A60.00


1        ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2       
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHAR G E
3 LETIER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRJEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSE L 'S RE LEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDmONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE REC ORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

17 Oct 2013      FD-2013-00597


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advi s e applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and vo tes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's reques t.












T O :


SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST , SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AF B , TX 7 8 1 50-4742

FROM:


SECRET ARY OFlllE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE Rl!VIEW BOARD 1 535 COMMAND Dlt. EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD i. 7 62-?001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00  (EF-V2)  Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00597
GENERAL:         The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change the reason and authority for discharge, and to change the reenlistment code is denied.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh based on his personal life at the time. Upon review of the record, the Board was unable to find any documentation regarding the discharge. Due to lack of evidence and supporting documentation to explain the discharge, the Board concludes that the misconduct was a significant departure from the conduct expected of all military members. The Board relies on the presumption of regularity and finds the characterization; reason for discharge and the reenlistment code were appropriate.

The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on 14 March 2001) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.


Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00504_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00504_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00597

    Original file (FD-2008-00597.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ee 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 19 Feb 2010 FD-2008-00597 SSSUE AND a cae Case heard i in Washington, D.C, FORGE PGES. The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00177_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00177_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AfSN/SSANALAPPEARANCEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY ISSUESA94.S3INDEXNUMBERA84.001ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFJCATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEX*+x•+TAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINCDATE CASENUMBER19Jul2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00524_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00524_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.The Board findsthat neither the evidence ofrecord nor that provided by the applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00273_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00273_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAME OFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADEPERSONALAPPEARANCE x RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY x•+x•+X*+x•+ISSUESA94.S3A92.21INDEXNUMBERA49.00) ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEW OFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEX*+TAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDA1E CASENUMBER19Jul2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00459_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00459_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereason andauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:Upgradeofthedischarge,changeofreasonandauthorityfordischarge,andchangeofreenlistmentcodearedenied.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00774

    Original file (FD-2013-00774.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAM£OFSERVIctMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEIN1TIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANPERSONAL APPEARANCEX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSEi,,00xMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSUESA94.53L'<DEX!>1JMBERA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFlLECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMTITEOATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£AR.INCDATE CASENlJMB[R13Mar2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00563

    Original file (FD-2013-00563.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequeststochangethereasonandauthorityfordischargeandtochangethereenlistmentaredenied.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00622_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00622_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequestfortheupgradeofthedischarge,to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00221_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00221_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD ... • ' •• t ,,1,,1:I ' ST,FIRSTllDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANPERSONAL APPEARANCENAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZA110NxADDRESSA. 'IDORORGANIZATIONOFCOllNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSt1ESA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMllEllA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE...