Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00273_13
Original file (FD-2013-00273_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

G RAD E



PERSONAL APPEARANCE
x        RECORD REVIEW


ADDRES S AND OR ORGANIZATIONOF COUNSEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON

G EN      UOTHC
OTHER    DENY
x•+ x•+
X*+

x•+





ISSUES


A94.S3 A92.21




I NDEX NUMBER


A49.00




) ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW O F DISCHARGE
3       
LETTER OF NOTIF ICA T ION
4       
BRIE F OF PERSONNEL FIL E
COUNSEL ' S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF P ERSONAL APPEARANCE
X*+

TAP E RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARI N G DA 1E      CAS ENUMB ER

19 Jul 2013      FD-2013-00273
-------- -       - -- - --- - ---         - ----- - --- - --- - --· ·- -- - -- - - - -- - -- -   .        - -      -        - -      '
,,, ' ..
' ·        '        >        I        :

Case heard in Washington, D.C .

Advise applicant of the deci s ion of t he Board, the right to a pe rs on al appearance with/without counsel, and the right to s ubmit an application to the AFBCMR .

Names and votes will be m ade available to the applicant at the applican t 's request.

*Narrative reason and Authority
+RE Code







T O :

SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH A FB , T X 78150-4 742


S ECRETARY OF 111E AIR FORCE PERSO NNE L COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD
1535 CO . 'lfllfAND DR, EE WIN G , JRD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB , MD l0 7 6:Z. '7e01


AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00       (EF-V2)  Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00273
GENERAL: The applicant appeals to change the reason and authority for the discharge and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING:         The requests to change the reason and authority for discharge and to change of reenlistment code are denied.

ISSUE: Applicant received an Honorable discharge for Unsatisfactory Performance

Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does submit that he would like a second chance despite his discrepancies so that he may serve his country in the
Ohio National Guard. The record indicates that on 19 Aug 2005 the applicant was disenrolled from the Air Traffic Control Course for failure to maintain academic standards. Based on this failure, he was given a
second opportunity to remain in the Air Force as a Bioenvironmental Engineering Apprentice. However, on 18 January 2006 the applicant "".as disenrolled from the Bioenvironmental Engineering Apprentice Course for failure to maintain academic standards.     The Board opined that the applicant had ample opportunities to remain in the Air Force and suc'ceed in training. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has a good job. However, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00820

    Original file (FD-2013-00820.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEL"ITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSEL MEMBERSITTrNG GENUOTHCOTHER DENY x•+ISSUESA94.S4INDEXNUMBERA49.001ORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARDx•+x•+xx•+2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHTBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENVMBER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00658

    Original file (FD-2013-00658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUESA92.21A92.0lINDEXNUMBERA67.101 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUM8ER05Feb2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00273

    Original file (FD2006-00273.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. DAS: 20 Dec 02. b. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: a. Enlisted as AB 18 Jun 02 for 4 yrs.

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00273

    Original file (FD-2010-00273.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW weg NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING. © ~ Hon | GEN | UorHc | oTHER | DENY ~ ~~ | x stan ISSUES A92.35 INpEANUmPER 4 66.00 ae Fectaee enn eee A92.21 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A92.01 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00591_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00591_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDGRADE AFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEADDRESSANDORORGA.NIZATIONOFCOUNSEL Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00250_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00250_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealstochange thereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequesttochangethereason andauthorityfordischargeandtochangeofreenlistmentcodeisdenied. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00221_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00221_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD ... • ' •• t ,,1,,1:I ' ST,FIRSTllDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANPERSONAL APPEARANCENAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZA110NxADDRESSA. 'IDORORGANIZATIONOFCOllNSELGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSt1ESA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMllEllA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2003-00281

    Original file (FD2003-00281.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD 20762-1002 I (EF-V2) P r e v i o u s edition will be u s e d AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00281 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and a Vacation for misconduct. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00774

    Original file (FD-2013-00774.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAM£OFSERVIctMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEIN1TIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANPERSONAL APPEARANCEX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSEi,,00xMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xxISSUESA94.53L'<DEX!>1JMBERA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFlLECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMTITEOATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£AR.INCDATE CASENlJMB[R13Mar2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00615

    Original file (FD-2013-00615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANlZATlONOFCOUELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENYxA94.0SA67.101 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATI: CASENUMBER10Jan2014 FD-2013-00615Case...