Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00584
Original file (FD-2013-00584.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LASf , FIRST MIDDLE INlTIAL)

GRADE    AFSN/SSAN



PERSONAL APPEARANCE      X        RECORD REVIEW

ADDRESS AND OR ORCANIZATION OFCOUNSEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON      GEN

UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
x+ x+ x+
x•+
x+


ISSUES
A92 .0l

INDEX NUMBER

A67.10

A94.05   1 ORDER APPOrNTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICAT ION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LEITER OF NOTlFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO TliE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HltARING DATE    CASE: NUMBER

10 Jan 2014      FD-20 13-00584

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board,the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.

*Narrative Reason and Authority
+RE Code







TO:

SAF/MRBR
550 c STREET WEST, surrn40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PF.RSONNEi, COUNOL
AIR FORCE DISOlAAGE V1£W BOARD IS.JS COMMAND DR.EE WINO.JRD F\.OOR A1. 'JDR£WS AFB,MD 20762.7001


AFRQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00  (EF-V2Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00584

GENERAL:         The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change the reason and authority for discharge, and to change the reenlistment code is denied.

ISSUE:   Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions and Vacation of the Suspension of Discharge

Applicant claims his discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh and states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. The record indicated the applicant received one Article 15, one Vacation, and four Letters of Reprimand. His misconduct included failed to go to duty(2x), late for duty (2x), late for Article 15 response appointment, failed to maintain current vehicle insurance on POV, with intent to defraud wrote five checks to AAFES totaling $1260.00 while having insufficient funds in account, drove vehicle on installation when ordered not to by a Lt Col, failed to obey lawful order from SNCO, provided false statement to SNCO, failed to wear name tag on blue shirt, failed to follow a direct order, left CAC in computer card reader overnight, lied to SNCO, and failed to pay just debt. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was
appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on
16 December 2005) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

The Board noted that the applicant stated that at the time of discharge his commander and first sergeant assured him he would be eligible for his G.I. Bill benefits. The DD Form 2366, mentioned above, and the Veterans Administration are the only authority for receipt of G.I. Bill benefits.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00557_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00557_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforUnsatisfactoryPerformance-PersonalFinances (Primary)andMisconduct-MinorDisciplinary...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00468_13

    Original file (FD-2010-00468_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCE DISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDGRADEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL HON GEN UOTHC OTHER xxA94.0SA67.10A66.00ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARDAPPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGELETTEROF NOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGBEARJNGDATI: CASENUMBER OSSep2013FD-2010-00468CaseheardinWashington,D.C.Advise applicantofthe decisionoftheBoard,the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00465

    Original file (FD-2013-00465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANTYPE GEN x I PERSONALAPPEARANCEI RECORD REVIEW fJ!. :k::: NAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATION YES NoxADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL:_ .MEMBERSITTINGHON GENUOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ I I I IX*+ISSUES A94.05 INDEXNUMBER A67.10 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00755

    Original file (FD-2013-00755.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDBEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADEX RECORDREVIEADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUl'l'SU.MEMBERSIITINGHONGENUOTHCOTHERDENYxxxxxISSUESA94.53INDEXNIJMB[RA67.101ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER17Apr2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00073

    Original file (FD-2015-00073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthereviewbecompleted based ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-ConductPrejudicial...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00036

    Original file (FD-2010-00036.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE TYPE GEN | | x | RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING GEN x Xx x x Xx ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 es ] |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00218_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00218_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischargetohonorable, tochangethereason andauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Upgrade ofthedischarge, change ofreason andauthority fordischarge, and changeof...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00404

    Original file (FD-2014-00404.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappeals forupgradeofdischarge to Honorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE:TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-ConductPrejudicialtoGoodOrder...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00615

    Original file (FD-2013-00615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANlZATlONOFCOUELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENYxA94.0SA67.101 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATI: CASENUMBER10Jan2014 FD-2013-00615Case...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00681

    Original file (FD-2013-00681.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARING RECORDNA\1EOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORD REVIEWl-COllNSEl --1NJ\1EOf COUNSEL J\'OORORGAi'il7..AHOXYES No xMEMBERSITTINGADDRESS MW ORORGMill'.J\TIONOfCOUNSELVOTE OFTHE BOARD HON GEN UOTI-IC OTHER A67.90 EXHIBITSSUBMITTEDTOTH.EBOARD IORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOF DISCHARGE3 LErfEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEF OFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXH1131TSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPE...