Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00615
Original file (FD-2013-00615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE
AF SNISS A N



X        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORCANlZATlON OFCOUEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON

GE N      UO T HC
OT HE R    DENY
x x x x
x



A94.0S
A67.10

1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LEITER OF NOTI FI C ATI ON
4 BRIEF OF PERSONN EL FI L E COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SU BM I TTED AT TIME OF P E R SONAL APPEARAN C E
T A P E RECO RD ING OF PERSONAL APPE A RANCE H EARIN G


HEA R I N G DATI:    CASE NUM B E R

10 Jan 2014      FD-2013-00615


Case h e ard i n W a s hi n gton, D . C.

Advise a pp li c ant o f t he de cision of the B oard, t h e ri ght to a persona l a ppearanc e with/without counsel, a n d th e right to su b mi t an ap pli ca ti on to th e A F B C MR .

Nam es and vot es will be m a de a va ila bl e to th e a pplican t at th e appli ca nt ' s r e que s t.











TO :


SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET W ES T . SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB , TX 78 150-47 4 2


SECRETA R Y OF IBE AIR FORCE P ERSONNEL C OU N ClL AIR FOR C E D I SOiARC E REV I EW OOARD
lSJS COM Jll ANO DR. EE WING , JR D FLOO R
AND RE WS A FB, MD 20762-1001


AFHQ FORM 0-207 7, JA N 00         (E F -V2 P r evious




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00615
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disciplinary Infractions

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh and believes he has been punished long enough. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, one Vacation, two Letters of Reprimand, and one Letter of Counseling. His misconduct included failed to report to guard mount on time (5x), and slept on duty (2x). The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant's service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well and has a good job. However, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized his term of service.

The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on June 14, 2007) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00031

    Original file (FD-2014-00031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD HEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEWAFSN/SSANADDRtSSANDORORCA'.llZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY x .• xISSUESA92.35INDEXNUMBER A66.00 mintssUB1tP'f! '1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMTITEDAT TIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGH£ARl1'CDATE CASENUMBER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00792

    Original file (FD-2013-00792.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMlOOLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSANPERSONALAPPEARANCEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANl7.ATIONOfCOUNSELx MEMBERsrITING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY...

  • AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00652

    Original file (FD-2012-00652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistment code. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,viavideo teleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMarylandandRandolphAFBTexason27Jan2014. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00805

    Original file (FD-2013-00805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEJNlTlAL)PERSONALAPPEARANCE , ... .., NAIEorCOUl'o'.S £ LANOORORGANIV.TIONGRADE AFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEW-'ODRF,SSA,0ORORCANIV.TIONOFCOUl'SELMEMBERSITTINGVOTE01'nn:BOHON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xISSUESA94.53INDEX1'1UM81:R A67.10 EXUIBITSSOBMJ'r'fEDT-0T 1 .RD1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00581

    Original file (FD-2013-00581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINql.AL). GRADEPERSONAL APPEARANCEx RECORDREVIEW ADORE$ ANDORORCANIZATIONOFCOUNS&L MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHERDENYISSUESA92.35INDEXNUMBER A66.00 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOfDISCHARGE3 LETIEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINCDATE CAS£NUM8ER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00688

    Original file (FD-2013-00688.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,nRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSANPERSONALAPPEARANCEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSCLxMEMBERSITTINGUOTHC OTI!ER DENYx•+ A84.00 ;BXH181 MmEDTQllUi(BO.vnORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEIT£ROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTlIEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEx•+x•+x•+.x•+TAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGllEARINCDATE CASENUMHR13Mar2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00126

    Original file (FD-2014-00126.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeto(honorable)(general)(and)(tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge),(and)(tochangethereenlistmentcode).TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00652

    Original file (FD-2013-00652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00690_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00690_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEl\TOAl.) GRADEX RECORDREVIEW1-----1NAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATIONADDRESSANOORORGANIZHIONOFCOUNSELNoVOTEOFTHEBOARDMEMBERSITTINGHON GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY x x A49.00 EXHIBITSSUBMJTTEDTOTHEBOARDORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICl\TION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTED J\...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00738

    Original file (FD-2013-00738.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FlRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)YES NoxGRADE AFSN/SSAN X RECORDREVIEWADOR£SSANDORORGANll.ATIONorCOUNSELVOTEOfTllEBOARDMEMBERSITTINGUOTHC OTHER DENY1ORDERAPPOINTlNGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVlEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETI'EROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFlLECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATI01 May2014 CASt:NUMBt.R...