Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00218_13
Original file (FD-2013-00218_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAS T , FIRST MIDDLE INTilAL)

G RAD E


AFSN/SSAN

PERSONAL APPEARANCE      x        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORCANIZATION or COUNS E L



MEMBER SITTING  HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER

DENY

X+* X+*
X+*

X + * X + *

A67.90

1       
ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2       
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHAR GE
3       
L EITER OF NOTIFICATION
4       
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF P ERS ONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

1 9 J ul 20 1 3      F D-20 1 3 -002 1 8

Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the righ t to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant 's reques t.

+Narrative Reason
*Reenlistment Code








SAFIMRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB , TX 78150-4742
FROM:

SECRET ARY OF THE AlR FORC E PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW B()ARD 1 535 COMMAND DR, EE WI.N C , 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD :I0762-7001


AFHQ F ORM 0 -2077, JAN 00         ( E F -V2)  Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00218
GENERAL:         The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING:         Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code are denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant was discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for a Pattern of Misconduct: Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline. The applicant wants his discharge upgraded because he would like to join the Air National Guard and be eligible to receive GI Bill benefits.
The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, a Letter of Reprimand, and a Special Court Martial conviction. His misconduct included underage consumption (2x), operating vehicle while
intoxicated, lied to civilian authorities, driving on installation while driving privileges suspended/revoked for a year (2x), and DWI. The applicant has repeatedly engaged in acts of misconduct that exemplify a blatant disregard for standards of acceptable conduct. The applicant's failure to conform to established behavioral expectations and Air Force standards clearly demonstrates his lack of integrity and his inability to adhere to Air Force standards. The DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. The Board concluded the applicant's misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all.military members. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant's service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

The applicant cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bill benefits as justification for upgrade. The DRB noted that when the applicant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on August 29, 1996) that he understood he must receive an Honorable discharge to receive future educational entitlements. The Board was sympathetic to the impact the loss of these benefits was having on the applicant, but this is not a matter of inequity or impropriety which would warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.




Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00524_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00524_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.The Board findsthat neither the evidence ofrecord nor that provided by the applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00584

    Original file (FD-2013-00584.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals forupgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authorityfor thedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservice record.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Therequestfortheupgradeofthedischarge,tochangethereasonandauthorityfordischarge,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00615

    Original file (FD-2013-00615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANlZATlONOFCOUELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENYxA94.0SA67.101 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATI: CASENUMBER10Jan2014 FD-2013-00615Case...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00130

    Original file (FD-2014-00130.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD•u •..L\ST,FIRSTMIDDLEINIDAL)GRADE AFSNJSSANPERSONAL APPEARANCEX RECORD REVIEWNAMEOt'COUNSELANDORORGANIZATIONADDRESSANDORORCANIZATION OFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGHON GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xx1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDlSCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITTONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER01May2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00521

    Original file (FD-2013-00521.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FlRsrMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUJ\'SELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY ISSUESA93.23INDEXNUMBERA66.00A67.0S1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTiiEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTED ATTlMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBERlOJan2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00465

    Original file (FD-2013-00465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANTYPE GEN x I PERSONALAPPEARANCEI RECORD REVIEW fJ!. :k::: NAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATION YES NoxADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL:_ .MEMBERSITTINGHON GENUOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ I I I IX*+ISSUES A94.05 INDEXNUMBER A67.10 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2008-00555

    Original file (FD-2008-00555.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN TYPE xX PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x x T x “ISSUES 494.55 PUERBUMER = A671 A13.00 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00194

    Original file (FD-2014-00194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischarge to honorable. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequests thatthereview becompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00426

    Original file (FD-2010-00426.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW f NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY F x x x x | x ISSUES A94.11 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 —— ae , A01.53 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00557_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00557_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforUnsatisfactoryPerformance-PersonalFinances (Primary)andMisconduct-MinorDisciplinary...