Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00435_13
Original file (FD-2013-00435_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LASf, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

G RADE



PERSONAL APP.EARANCE
x        RECORD REVIEW
ADD RESS AND OR OR C AN I Z A T I 0 . ' 1 OF COUNSEL




MEMBER SITTING
HON      GEN

UOTHC    OTHER
DENY
x x x x
x


A62.00

1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

02 Aug 2013      FD-2013-00435


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant 's request.












TO:


SAF/MRBR
550 CSTREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742


SECRETARY OFTHE AIR FORCEPERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
ISJS COMMAND DR, EE WING. 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AJ'B, MD 107,2-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00435
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant was discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge for Fraudulent Entry into the Military. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because his recruiter instructed him not to include his use of illegal substances when he was a young teen. He also states that during his security upgrade he decided to answer the questions truthfully and they didn't match the previous answers when he enlisted. The records indicated on 4 October 2001, during an interview with OSI, the applicant admitted to using marijuana approximately 1500 times prior to entering the Air Force. He also admitted to frequent experimentation with mushrooms, acid, ecstasy, and opium. The records did not show his discharge was a result of the recruiter's undue influence. The Board concluded the applicant's misconduct was a significant departure from conduct expected of all military members. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

In addition, the applicant received two Letters of Reprimand and Records of Individual Counseling. His misconduct included failure to go at prescribed time (x3) and departed duty section without proper authorization. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.




Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00463_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00463_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINJ11AL)GRADEPERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW ADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGHON GENUOTHCOTHERxxA67.10 A93.0l 1ORDERAPPOCNTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF · PERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEAJllNGDATE CASENUMBER17Oct2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00665

    Original file (FD-2013-00665.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischarge tohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00222_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00222_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason andauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at AndrewsAFBon02Jul2013.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: Upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistmentcodearedenied.TheBoard...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00768

    Original file (FD-2013-00768.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00550_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00550_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MEMBEISSUES A94.53...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00673_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00673_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Applicant receivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-Drug...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00298

    Original file (FD-2010-00298.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The record indicates the applicant was discharged following his admission that he had smoked marijuana prior to entering the Air Force and concealed that information on his entrance documents.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00419_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00419_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDER(LASf,FIRSfMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEPERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOVNSELMEMBERSITTINGHON GENUOTHC OTHER DENY 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRlEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER 02Aug2013 FD-2013-00419Caseheardin...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00439_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00439_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailable servicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischargeTheBoard findsthat neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00220

    Original file (FD-2013-00220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    lORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEForPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCE TAPERECORDINGOF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE CASENU!\:IBER12May2014 FD-2013-00220CaseheardinWashington,D.C.Adviseapplicantofthedecisionof theBoardandthe righttosubmitanapplicationtotheAFBCMR. TO•SAF/MRBR550CSTREET WEST,SUITE40 RANDOLPHAFB,TX78150-4742 SECRETARYOF THEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCIL...