Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00419_13
Original file (FD-2013-00419_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

ER (LASf, FIRSf MIDDLE INITIAL)
GRADE



PERSONAL APPEARANCE
x        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESSANDORO RGANIZATION OFCOVNSEL




MEMBER SITTING

HON      G EN

U OTHC    OTHER    D ENY
x x x x
x


A67.10

1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LEITER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRlEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING


HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

02 Aug2013       FD-2013-00419


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant 's request.











TO:


SAFIMRBR
550 CSTREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB,TX 78150-4742

FROM:


SECRETARY OFTHE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COVNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGI! REVIEW BOARD
JS)S COMMAND DR. EE WING,JRDFLOOR
ANDREWS AFB. MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00  (EF-V2Previous




AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00419
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disciplinary Infractions

Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The record indicates the applicant received one Article 15, five Letters of Reprimand, and one Letter of Counseling. His misconduct included with intent to deceive made a false official statement to two NCOs, made a false statement to the first sergeant, failed to deny entry to unescorted third country nationals employed by a civilian construction company, received BAH while living in the dorm, walked behind running aircraft, appeared to be sleeping on duty, admitted to negligence of assigned duties, failed to report in full service dress uniform to commander, failed to have dorm room in inspection order, failed to go to duty on time, and assaulted a civilian police officer by spitting on him and kicking him. The Board opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00409_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00409_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforAPatternofMisconduct-ConductPrejudicial toGood...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00342_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00342_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthedischarge.The Board findsthat neither the evidence ofrecord nor that provided bythe applicant substantiates aninequityorimproprietythatwould...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00682

    Original file (FD-2013-00682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARING RECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER (LAST,RRST l\UDDLE INITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSAN X RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANIZATION01'COUl'ISEL xMEMBER SITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUllS INDEX NUMB&RA92.21A94.SSA67.10ORDER APPOINTINGTHE BOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEWOf DISCHAR GE3 LITTEROFNOTIFICATION 4 BRIEFOFPERSONNEL FILECOUNSEL"S RELEASETOnlEBOARD ADDITIONALEXlilBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDING 01'PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGlt &ARINCDAT! ;;...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00307_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00307_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARDHEARING RECORDNAl\fEOFSERVICE MEMBER(LAST,FIRSI'MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEW OFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER02Aug2013 FD-2013-00307 \:;:j;! ;14 Lv 1JPfhZ'1:? Caseheardin...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00220

    Original file (FD-2013-00220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    lORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE LETTER OFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEForPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONALAPPEARANCE TAPERECORDINGOF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE CASENU!\:IBER12May2014 FD-2013-00220CaseheardinWashington,D.C.Adviseapplicantofthedecisionof theBoardandthe righttosubmitanapplicationtotheAFBCMR. TO•SAF/MRBR550CSTREET WEST,SUITE40 RANDOLPHAFB,TX78150-4742 SECRETARYOF THEAIRFORCEPERSONNELCOUNCIL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00533_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00533_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSNISSANX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANll.ATIONOFCOUNSEL Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented yet) Drawn Shape (ignored-not implemented...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00419

    Original file (FD-2008-00419.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, change of reason and authority for discharge, and change of reenlistment code. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propricty of the discharge, and aller a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justily a change of discharge. The Board found the egregious nature of the offenses and continued poor choices warranted discharge and a general characterization.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | fd-2013-00284_13

    Original file (fd-2013-00284_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereason and authority forthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withcounsel,viavideo teleconferencebetween AndrewsAFB,Maryland,andRandolph AFB,Texas,on11Sep2013. Thefollowing additional exhibitsweresubmittedatthehearing: Exhibit # 5:Applicant'sContentionsTheattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge....

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00308

    Original file (FD-2013-00308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorableTheapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneralDischargeforMisconduct:MinorDisciplinaryInfractions ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00326_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00326_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withoutcounsel,at AndrewsAFBon24Oct2013. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactorsleading tothe discharge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge.