Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00731
Original file (FD-2013-00731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
 GRADE    AFSNISSAN


X        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZ.ATION OFCOUNSEL


MEMBER SITTING
HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER
DENY
 x















ISSUES








A92.35






INDEX NVM.BER    A66.00
x x x
x

1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

27 Feb 2014
FD-2013-00731


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.
















I
TO:






SAF!M.RBR
550 CSTREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB.TX 78150-4742
II       -        -        -
ffiOM:
SECRETARY OFTHE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, El! WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE		 CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00731

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Drug Abuse

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was based on an isolated incident. The record indicates that the applicant received an Article 15 for use of marijuana. The record shows that the applicant was identified as using through a random urinalysis. She admitted to the use. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in her two
years and eleven months of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board found the negative aspects of the willful misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of the applicant's performance and concluded that the discharge was appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00731

    Original file (FD-2014-00731.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERA L: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00486_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00486_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeto(honorable)(general)(and)(tochangethe reason andauthorityforthedischarge),(and)(tochangethereenlistmentcode). Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00552_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00552_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDT,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANl2.ATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTING1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITIEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER03Oct2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00607_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00607_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason andauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00377_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00377_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00335_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00335_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00671

    Original file (FD-2013-00671.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARING RECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER (lAST,FIRST MIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN X RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL INDEXNUMBER A66.00 GENUOTHCOTHER DENY x1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFOR REVIEWOFDISCHARGELETTER OF NOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETO THEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUMBER OSFeb2014FD-2013-00671CaseheardinWashington,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00378_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00378_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.TheBoardfindsthatneithertheevidenceofrecordnorthatprovidedbythe applicant substantiates...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00347_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00347_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: Applicant receivedaGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuseApplicant contendsdischargewasinequitablebecauseitwasbased...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00461_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00461_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetogeneral.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...