Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00609
Original file (FD-2012-00609.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD


NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

GRADE

AFSN/SSAN



x        PERSONAL APPEARANCE
RECORD REVIEW


NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL





HON

GEN

UOTHC

OTHER    DENY

x x x








ISSUES




A92.35


16.oo
x
x

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING DATE    CASE NUMBER

05 Feb 2014      FD-2012-00609


Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.












TO:


SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742


FROM:



SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2012-00609

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Drug Abuse

Applicant originally received an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge for drug abuse on 29 August 2005. On 6 October 2005, the applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) for upgrade of his UOTHC to a General service characterization. The case was boarded 24 May 2006 and the applicant received an upgrade to a General service characterization. The applicant now contends that he mistakenly requested upgrade to a General service characterization and is requesting upgrade to an Honorable service characterization based on his misconduct being an isolated incident. The
record indicated the applicant received an Article 15 for use of marijuana. The applicant admitted to the use. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his two years and eight months of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board found the negative aspects of the willful misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of the applicant's performance and concluded that the General discharge is appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00609_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00609_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforAPatternofMisconduct-ConductPrejudicialtoGood...

  • AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00048

    Original file (FD-2012-00048.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargeservicecharacterization tohonorable,to changethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode. Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00007

    Original file (FD-2010-00007.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN t TYPE UOTHC PERSONAL APPEARANCE x | RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY - ee eee Xx xX x ‘ Xx : xX ISSUES AOI 25 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 A85.01 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A94.05 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2011-00008

    Original file (FD-2011-00008.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The record indicates that the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand for wrongful use of spice.

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00461_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00461_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetogeneral.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00251

    Original file (FD-2010-00251.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING ~~ HON | GEN. | UOTHC | OTHER | DENY xX ¢ x Xx L Xx x ISSUES A92.35 INDEX NUMBER - A66.00 A92.21 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A92.01 2. |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00791

    Original file (FD-2013-00791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorableandtochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheDRBfindstheapplicantsubmittednoissuescontestingtheequityorproprietyofthedischarge,andafterathoroughreview oftherecord,the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00646

    Original file (FD-2013-00646.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCEDISCHARGEREVIEW BOARDHEARINGRECORD NAME OFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST, FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSANPERSONALAPPEARANCE X RECORDREVIEWADDR.ESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELISSUES A93.19 MEMBERSIITING INDEXNUMBER A67.10 HON GENUOTHC OTHER DENY A94.05 A93.211 ORDERAPPOINTING THEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEW OF DISCHARGELETTER OFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOF PERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEAIUNGDATE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00201_13

    Original file (FD-2012-00201_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOF SERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRST MIDDLE L'IJITIAL) GRADEAFSNISSAN x PERSONALAPPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW NAME OFCOUNSELAND ORORGANIZATION(b) (6)ADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL(b) (6)MEMBERSITTINGHON GEN UOTHCxOTHER DENY ISSUESA92.21A94.55INDEX NUMBERA60.00ORDERAPPOINTING THEBOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEW OFDISCHARGELEITEROFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITS SUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00160_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00160_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER (LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADE AFSN/SSAN x PERSONALAPPEARANCE NAME OFCOUNSELANDORORCANIL'ITJONRECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGUOTHC OTHER DENY X*ISSUESAOl.57INDEX NUMBERA66.00X*1ORDERAPPOINTING THEBOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVCEW OF DISCHARGELEITEROFNOTIFICATIONBRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF...