Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00072
Original file (FD-2010-00072.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
X PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW
= NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
X*+
X*+
| xX* +
X*+
X*+
ISSUES A92.02 INDEX NUMBER A67.50
1 {ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
31 Jan 2012 FD-2010-00072

 

 

 

 
 

 
     

Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

+ CHANGE RE CODE
* CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIA

 

 

SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00072

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), without counsel, at
Andrews AFB on 31 Jan 2012.

The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing:
Exhibit #5: Applicant’s Contentions

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board grants the requested relief.

ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for a Pattern of Misconduct — Conduct Prejudicial to Good
Order and Discipline

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable in comparison to his overall service. The records indicated the
applicant received one Article 15, one Vacation, two Letters of Reprimand, one Record of Individual
Counseling and one Memorandum for Record for misconduct. His misconduct included failed to report for ~
contingency training, failed to report on time to place of duty, failed to pay military Star Card (2x), failed to
report on time to the gym, left place of duty without authority, failed to follow work instructions to
accomplish a task, and violated a profile order. After a thorough and complete consideration of the
information submitted by the applicant, the applicant’s compelling testimony, and the information contained
in the record the Board found the Vacation action received by the applicant on Jun 7, 2007 to be improper,.
The Vacation was based on the applicant failing to refrain from moving a bridge on or about April 16, 2007
while on a restrictive medical profile. The applicant received a medical profile on April 10, 2007 with an
expiration of May 8, 2007. The only restrictions noted on the profile were that the applicant could not

engage in sit-ups. The Board opined that the Vacation action was what prompted the commander to initiate
discharge. Although the Board did not condone the applicant’s behavior, they concluded the misconduct
was minor in nature compared to his overall service and he should have been given the opportunity to
rehabilitate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was inconsistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and finds the applicant was not provided
full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the overall quality of applicant’s service is more
accurately reflected by an Honorable discharge, the reason for the discharge is more accurately described as
Secretarial Authority and the reenlistment code changed to 3K under the provisions of Title 10, USC 1553.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2003-00072

    Original file (FD2003-00072.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    /I TO: SAFMRBR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78 150-4742 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCEARGE REVlEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00072 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. (No appeal) (No mitigation) (2) 7 Nov 01, Andrews AFB, MD - Article 86. A Commander, 89...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00072

    Original file (FD-2015-00072.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.ISSUE:The applicant receivedaGeneral discharge forMisconduct -Minor DisciplinaryInfractionsTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,underits...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00465

    Original file (FD-2013-00465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLE INITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANTYPE GEN x I PERSONALAPPEARANCEI RECORD REVIEW fJ!. :k::: NAMEOFCOUNSELANDORORGANIZATION YES NoxADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSEL:_ .MEMBERSITTINGHON GENUOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ I I I IX*+ISSUES A94.05 INDEXNUMBER A67.10 1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00325_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00325_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable, tochangethereason and authority forthedischarge, andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailable servicerecord.Theattached briefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoardgrantstherequestedrelief. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00302

    Original file (FD-2010-00302.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ | ny x + * L X+ * X*+ X*+ ISSUES A94.06 INDEX NUMBER A67.50 A93.22 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_ | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3. The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing: Exhibit #5: Applicant’s Contentions Exhibit #6: Department of Veterans...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00426

    Original file (FD-2010-00426.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW f NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC | OTHER DENY F x x x x | x ISSUES A94.11 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 —— ae , A01.53 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00412

    Original file (FD-2010-00412.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW icp : i NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN voTHC | OTHER DENY X*+ Ke X#+ X*+ i i Xe ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00320

    Original file (FD-2013-00320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 ORDER APPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEF OF PERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHE BOARD ADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDING OFPERSONAL APPEARANCEHEARINGHEARING DATE CASENUMBER 28Jan2014 FD-2013-00320Caseheardviavideo-teleconferencebetweenJointBaseAndrewsMarylandandRobinsAFBGeorgia Adviseapplicantof thedecisionof theBoardandtherighttosubmitanapplicationtotheAFBCMR. Namesandvoteswillbemadeavailabletotheapplicantat...

  • AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00287_13

    Original file (FD-2012-00287_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasoffered apersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthedischarge. ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractionsApplicant...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00235

    Original file (FD2006-00235.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SECRICTARY OF TIIE AIR FORCE PERSONNBI, COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING.3RD FLOOR ANDREWS APE, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVlEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NlIMBhK FD-2006-00235 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The records indicated the applicant received an...