Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00186
Original file (FD-2009-00186.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) ; GRADE — AFSN/SSAN
PERSONAL APPEARANCE RECORD REVIEW

re NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

AMERICAN LEGION ATTN: QUEEN BAKER 1608 K STREET NW
WASHINGTON DC 20006

   
    

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING HON GEN voTHc | OTHER DENY
X+*
Ke
X+*
X+*
X+*
‘SSUES A94,05 INDEXNUMBER _ A67.90 Jpco EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE oe

 

 

ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION -
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE

COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD

ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL. APPEARANCE

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

 

 

 

mlb |e

 

 

HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER

18 May 2010 FD-2009-00186
REPLICATES ISSUE ANS THE BOARD’ SBECIIONAL REA TIONALE ARE DISCUS ON IHE ATTACHED AlN RORGEDINHANGH Ney EW ROI DER NONAD RATIONED "7
ees ove 2

ce

 

 

 

 

 

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

+ Narrative Reason
* RE Code

 

"FROM:

SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD) 20762-7001

 

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00186

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and
authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, at Andrews
AFB on 18 May 2010. The following witness also testified on the applicant’s behalf: Ms. JT, applicant’s
mother.

The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing:
Exhibit 5: Applicant’s Contentions
Exhibit 6: American Legion Statement
Exhibit 7: Character reference letters

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge, the change of reason and authority for
discharge, and change of reenlistment code.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

Issue 1. Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh in light of his performance
over the years. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15 and three Letters of Counseling
(LOC). The applicant did not provide responses to the first Article 15 and the three LOCs. His misconduct
included purchasing alcohol for a minor (Article 92), falsely signing an official document (Article 107),
failure to go, not prepared for training day, and speeding on a military installation. Both Article 15s
involved underage alcohol incidents. Applicant acknowledged his misconduct in response to the last Article
15, and acknowledged all of the misconduct in response to the discharge notification. The DRB opined that
through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior.
The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00497

    Original file (FD-2008-00497.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AMERICAN LEGION 1608 K STREET NW WASHINGTON DC 20006 HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY ME x¥4 XFt xe X¥t issues — : — VW BO ISSUES A93.15 INDEX NUMBER AG7.90 Pe ee ae A94.05 1 [ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD }2_| APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION ne. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00292

    Original file (FD-2010-00292.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    & Z z ; X+ pop op ot | ; | | gd PoP oy op | X + ee ee ee Pop Foe f fo fof | ; INDER Rew A110 Be GEES UR EEE EO TEE BOARD 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 26 Jun 2012 FD-2010-00292 Case heard in Washington, D.C. The Board opined that the LOC...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00044

    Original file (FD-2009-00044.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    * CHANGE RE CODE + CHANGE REASON AND AUTHORITY TO SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY 580 C STREET WEST, SULLE 4u 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFR, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00044 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade to honorable, change reason and authority and authority and change reenlistment code. he Board finds that neither the evidence of record...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00427

    Original file (FD-2010-00427.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN 576-39-1434 X PERSONAL ArPEARANCE TYPE GEN RECORD REVIEW ,] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER X+ ee Act AC ene Ne mr | | | i | | | | ISSUES 94.02 ' A6v.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 1 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00149

    Original file (FD-2009-00149.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE X | RECORD REVIEW 4] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL OTHER DENY x x xX x x | ISSUES A931 I INDEX NUMBER A67.90 E ! The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00262

    Original file (FD-2010-00262.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    i | Poof GEE J x i ee ee poo oG oF bE dG | i oy | | i of 4 | i ; ; i i ee ee | i 4 “ ee | HE | Poy od | rf - Po bod ot dg | ISSUES ‘493.19 INDEX NUMBER rn 67.10 oe a a is f A92.21 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD A93.01 2 {APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 29 Mar 2012...

  • AF | DRB | CY2011 | FD-2010-00228

    Original file (FD-2010-00228.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (DRB), with counsel, at Andrews AFB on 08 Mar 2012. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00002

    Original file (FD-2009-00002.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. 8 Jul 04: LOR for failure to go.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00073

    Original file (FD-2009-00073.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EC LEEREe Ne ———— rites DATED 8/3/2010 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND OR, FE WING, IRD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00073 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The Board denies...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00302

    Original file (FD-2010-00302.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ | ny x + * L X+ * X*+ X*+ ISSUES A94.06 INDEX NUMBER A67.50 A93.22 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_ | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3. The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing: Exhibit #5: Applicant’s Contentions Exhibit #6: Department of Veterans...